Literature DB >> 30196362

Pearls and pitfalls of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 non-target lesion assessment.

Brian Morse1, Daniel Jeong2, Gary Ihnat3, Alvin C Silva4.   

Abstract

Oncologic imaging is an important facet of abdominal imaging that radiologists encounter nearly every day. Many oncology clinical trials utilize response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 which divides tumor sites into target and non-target lesions. Although RECIST v1.1 provides clear instructions regarding the use of imaging in clinical trials, errors in response assessment still occur using these criteria. This is especially true of response assessment with regards to non-target lesions which involve rules which are less well-defined and somewhat subjective. This pictorial essay will review RECIST v1.1 guidelines and common non-target lesion errors which can occur at baseline and follow-up response assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-target lesion; RECIST v1.1; Response assessment; Target lesion

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30196362      PMCID: PMC7771310          DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1752-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  7 in total

1.  The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists.

Authors:  A R Padhani; L Ollivier
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment.

Authors:  P Therasse; E A Eisenhauer; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Reporting results of cancer treatment.

Authors:  A B Miller; B Hoogstraten; M Staquet; A Winkler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Southwest Oncology Group standard response criteria, endpoint definitions and toxicity criteria.

Authors:  S Green; G R Weiss
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Influence of measurement error on assessment of response to anticancer chemotherapy: proposal for new criteria of tumor response.

Authors:  D Warr; S McKinney; I Tannock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 44.544

  7 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  The role of diagnostic imaging in the primary testicular cancer: initial staging, response assessment and surveillance.

Authors:  Kerry L Thomas; Daniel Jeong; Jaime Montilla-Soler; Sebastian Feuerlein
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-01

2.  Necroptosis throws novel insights on patient classification and treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bowen Hu; Jie Gao; Jihua Shi; Feng Zhang; Chengcheng Shi; Peihao Wen; Zhihui Wang; Wenzhi Guo; Shuijun Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Age does matter in adolescents and young adults vs. older adults with lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis comparing clinical characteristics and outcomes in response to systematic treatments.

Authors:  Lin Zhou; Huiwu Li; Shuhui Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.111

4.  Intratumoral CD8+ T cells as a potential positive predictor of chemoimmunotherapy response in PD-L1-negative advanced gastric cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gangling Tong; Meiqin Zhu; Yaoxu Chen; Shubo Wang; Boran Cheng; Shubin Wang; Wangjun Liao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-08

5.  177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in metastatic/inoperable pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma.

Authors:  Sanjeet Kumar Jaiswal; Vijaya Sarathi; Saba Samad Memon; Robin Garg; Gaurav Malhotra; Priyanka Verma; Ravikumar Shah; Manjeet Kaur Sehemby; Virendra A Patil; Swati Jadhav; Anurag Ranjan Lila; Nalini S Shah; Tushar R Bandgar
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.335

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.