Literature DB >> 30196210

How is biodiversity changing in response to ecological restoration in terrestrial ecosystems? A meta-analysis in China.

Chunbo Huang1, Zhixiang Zhou2, Changhui Peng3, Mingjun Teng4, Pengcheng Wang4.   

Abstract

Biodiversity is an important ecosystem characteristic, and is vital for maintaining ecosystem health and stability. However, biodiversity was often ignored in previous Chinese restoration planning and design due to its complex roles and the unclear mechanisms in providing human well-being. In order to evaluate the response of biodiversity to ecological restoration in terrestrial ecosystems, we assembled biodiversity in different metrics and different organisms and generated a large dataset comprised 2099 observations from 103 published studies to conduct a meta-analysis in China. Our results revealed that the biodiversity of restored ecosystem increased by 43% compared with degraded state, but it was difficult to recover to the natural level across the whole China. The gap between restored and natural ecosystems was about 13%. Ecological restorations have contributed not only to increasing vegetation coverage but also to improving soil environment and habitat quality. The recovery levels of vascular plant, soil microorganism and soil invertebrate were 30%, 73% and 48%, respectively. Biodiversity recovery would be better reflected in enhancing the structure feature (65%) such as plant height and density rather than the diversity feature (18%) such as diversity indices of Shannon and Simpson. Moreover, the response of biodiversity to ecological restoration varied with restoration actions (i.e., initial land use/cover type, restoration approach and restoration age), and the interaction effects among restoration actions significantly impacted biodiversity recovery. Passive approach performed better than active approach for biodiversity recovery. Meanwhile, the magnitude and direction of the impact of ecological restoration on biodiversity greatly altered with environmental conditions (i.e., climate condition and altitude). Our findings could facilitate priority setting and selection of treatment methods for biodiversity recovery during ecological restoration planning and assessment to ensure high effectiveness and sustainability.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodiversity; Climate; Ecological restoration; Land use; Restoration age

Year:  2018        PMID: 30196210     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Impacts of Precipitation and Temperature on Changes in the Terrestrial Ecosystem Pattern in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China.

Authors:  Jingwei Xiang; Weina Zhang; Xiaoqing Song; Jiangfeng Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Terrestrial ecosystem restoration increases biodiversity and reduces its variability, but not to reference levels: A global meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joe Atkinson; Lars A Brudvig; Max Mallen-Cooper; Shinichi Nakagawa; Angela T Moles; Stephen P Bonser
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 11.274

Review 3.  Biodiversity conservation in China: A review of recent studies and practices.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Chunting Feng; Fangzheng Liu; Junsheng Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2020-03-25

4.  Spatial and Temporal Variations of Habitat Quality and Its Response of Landscape Dynamic in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Liu; Qipeng Liao; Mingzhu Xiao; Dengyue Zhao; Chunbo Huang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.