Chih-Wei Chen1, Po-An Chen1, Chiung-Chen Chou1, Jui-Hsun Fu1, Po-Chin Wang1, Shuo-Hsiu Hsu1, Ping-Hong Lai2. 1. Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386 Ta-Chung First Rd., Kaohsiung 81362, Taiwan. 2. Department of Radiology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386 Ta-Chung First Rd., Kaohsiung 81362, Taiwan. Electronic address: pinghonglai@gmail.com.
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and radiation exposure when using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) algorithm for reconstructing craniocervical computed tomographic angiography images acquired at 100 kVp. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly divided 121 patients into three groups: group A (conventional protocol), 120 kVp with filtered back projection; group B, 120 kVp with 50% ASIR-V; and group C, 100 kVp with 50% ASIR-V. All patients underwent scans in a 256-slice computed tomography (CT) scanner. Radiation dose (volume CT dose index), dose-length product, and effective dose, objective parameters such as arterial attenuation value, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and noise obtained at head, neck, and shoulder levels were compared among the groups. Subjective image quality was independently assessed by two radiologists, and interobserver reliability was assessed using kappa analysis. RESULTS: The radiation dose in group C was the lowest (p < 0.01) with a 40% reduction in volume CT dose index, dose-length product, and effective dose values compared to group A, and group C showed higher arterial attenuation than either group A or B (p < 0.01). Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were higher and noise was lower in groups B and C than group A. Group C had better subjective image quality than groups A and B (p < 0.05), and the interobserver reliability between the two radiologists was high (k = 0.783). CONCLUSION: Compared to the conventional protocol, using 50% ASIR-V and the 100 kVp protocol during craniocervical computed tomographic angiography yields better objective and subjective image quality at lower radiation doses.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality and radiation exposure when using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) algorithm for reconstructing craniocervical computed tomographic angiography images acquired at 100 kVp. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly divided 121 patients into three groups: group A (conventional protocol), 120 kVp with filtered back projection; group B, 120 kVp with 50% ASIR-V; and group C, 100 kVp with 50% ASIR-V. All patients underwent scans in a 256-slice computed tomography (CT) scanner. Radiation dose (volume CT dose index), dose-length product, and effective dose, objective parameters such as arterial attenuation value, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and noise obtained at head, neck, and shoulder levels were compared among the groups. Subjective image quality was independently assessed by two radiologists, and interobserver reliability was assessed using kappa analysis. RESULTS: The radiation dose in group C was the lowest (p < 0.01) with a 40% reduction in volume CT dose index, dose-length product, and effective dose values compared to group A, and group C showed higher arterial attenuation than either group A or B (p < 0.01). Additionally, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were higher and noise was lower in groups B and C than group A. Group C had better subjective image quality than groups A and B (p < 0.05), and the interobserver reliability between the two radiologists was high (k = 0.783). CONCLUSION: Compared to the conventional protocol, using 50% ASIR-V and the 100 kVp protocol during craniocervical computed tomographic angiography yields better objective and subjective image quality at lower radiation doses.