Literature DB >> 30195011

Understanding the Popcorn Effect During Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Dusting.

Ali H Aldoukhi1, William W Roberts2, Timothy L Hall3, Joel M H Teichman4, Khurshid R Ghani5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess low and high power settings for the popcorn technique, and relationship of laser fiber-to-stone distance and calyceal size on submillimeter fragmentation. Our in vitro findings may help guide strategies to improve a dusting technique for ureteroscopy.
METHODS: BegoStones were fragmented in small (127 mm3) and large (411 mm3) sized bulbs to simulate calyces, using a 120 W Ho:YAG laser. A 242 μm fiber was introduced through a ureteroscope mounted to a 3D positioner with its tip located at 0 or 2 mm distance from the stones. 20 W [1 J × 20 Hz, 0.5 J × 40 Hz] and 40 W [1 J × 40 Hz, 0.5 J × 80 Hz] settings were assessed, including short pulse and long pulse modes. Total energy delivered was constant at 7.2 kJ. Primary outcome was percentage of stone mass converted to fragments <1 mm. High-speed imaging was performed to study stone movement and/or fragmentation.
RESULTS: For all settings, popcorn lithotripsy yielded more submillimeter fragments when performed with the fiber positioned on the stone compared to 2 mm from the stone (P <.05). Distribution of submillimeter fragments was higher when utilizing high frequencies regardless of pulse energy. At 2 mm distance, popcorning was more effective in the small model (P <.05). At 2 mm distance, short pulse was superior to long pulse. Video analysis showed fragmentation did not occur when stones collided with each other. At 80 Hz/2 mm distance, only 17.5% of pulses impacted fragments.
CONCLUSION: Popcorn technique is more effective when the fiber is directly in contact with stone, and when performed in a small calyceal model. Utilizing settings with higher frequencies may improve dusting outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30195011     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  10 in total

1.  Burnback: the role of pulse duration and energy on fiber-tip degradation during high-power laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Brandon A Levin; Ali H Aldoukhi; Kristian M Black; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Simulation of Laser Lithotripsy-Induced Heating in the Urinary Tract.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Brian MacConaghy; Jonathan D Harper; Ali H Aldoukhi; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Laser access and utilization preferences for pediatric ureteroscopy: A survey of the Societies of Pediatric Urology.

Authors:  Ray Yong; Gregory E Tasian; Kate H Kraft; William W Roberts; Adam Maxwell; Jonathan S Ellison
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Basic and advanced technological evolution of laser lithotripsy over the past decade: An educational review by the European Society of Urotechnology Section of the European Association of Urology.

Authors:  Lazaros Tzelves; Bhaskar Somani; Marinos Berdempes; Titos Markopoulos; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

5.  Role of low- versus high-power laser in the treatment of lower pole stones: prospective non-randomized outcomes from a university teaching hospital.

Authors:  Amelia Pietropaolo; Mriganka Mani; Thomas Hughes; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-05-26

6.  How do we assess the efficacy of Ho:YAG low-power laser lithotripsy for the treatment of upper tract urinary stones? Introducing the Joules/mm3 and laser activity concepts.

Authors:  Eugenio Ventimiglia; Felipe Pauchard; Antonio Rebello Horta Gorgen; Frédéric Panthier; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: aspects of intracorporeal lithotripsy in flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Søren Kissow Lildal; Kim Hovgaard Andreassen; Joyce Baard; Marianne Brehmer; Matthew Bultitude; Ylva Eriksson; Khurshid R Ghani; Helene Jung; Guido Kamphuis; Peter Kronenberg; Ben Turney; Olivier Traxer; Øyvind Ulvik; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Laser Fiber Displacement Velocity during Tm-Fiber and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Introducing the Concept of Optimal Displacement Velocity.

Authors:  Frederic Panthier; Thibault Germain; Cyril Gorny; Laurent Berthe; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Comparison of Fragmentation and Dusting Modality Using Holmium YAG Laser during Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stone: A Single-Center's Experience.

Authors:  Bo-Han Chen; Tsu-Feng Lin; Chih-Chun Tsai; Marcelo Chen; Allen W Chiu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser.

Authors:  Ralf Petzold; Arkadiusz Miernik; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.226

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.