Literature DB >> 30194444

Publication pressure and scientific misconduct: why we need more open governance.

Simon Gandevia1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 30194444     DOI： 10.1038/s41393-018-0193-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN： 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.

Authors:  David Cyranoski
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The pressure to publish pushes down quality.

Authors:  Daniel Sarewitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A Survey on Data Reproducibility and the Effect of Publication Process on the Ethical Reporting of Laboratory Research.

Authors:  Delphine R Boulbes; Tracy Costello; Keith Baggerly; Fan Fan; Rui Wang; Rajat Bhattacharya; Xiangcang Ye; Lee M Ellis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications.

Authors:  Andrew M Stern; Arturo Casadevall; R Grant Steen; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Bik; Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  The natural selection of bad science.

Authors:  Paul E Smaldino; Richard McElreath
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Questionable science and reproducibility in electrical brain stimulation research.

Authors:  Martin E Héroux; Colleen K Loo; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

Review 10.  'Spin' in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review.

Authors:  Kellia Chiu; Quinn Grundy; Lisa Bero
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 8.029
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  A review of the current concerns about misconduct in medical sciences publications and the consequences.

Authors:  Taraneh Mousavi; Mohammad Abdollahi
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Awareness of predatory journals and open access among medical oncologists: results of an online survey.

Authors:  Georg Richtig; Erika Richtig; Alexandra Böhm; Christoph Oing; Farastuk Bozorgmehr; Stephan Kruger; Barbara Kiesewetter; Christoph Zielinski; Anna S Berghoff
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2019-11-27

3.  Ten tips for teaching research integrity to early career students: A perspective over 20 years.

Authors:  Maruxa Martinez-Campos
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2022-08-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.