Yu Jin Cha1,2, Won Il Jang3, Mi-Sook Kim1, Hyung Jun Yoo1, Eun Kyung Paik1, Hee Kyung Jeong1, Sang-Min Youn4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea zzang11@kirams.re.kr. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether radiomic phenotypes of brain metastases (BM) are related to radiation therapy prognosis. This study assessed whether a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based radiomics model which learned computer tomography (CT) image features with minimal preprocessing, could predict early response of BM to radiosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumor images of 110 BM post stereotactic-radiosurgery (SRS) (within 3 months) were assessed (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor, version 1.1) as responders (complete or partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease). Datasets were axial planning CT images containing the tumor center, and the tumor response. Datasets were randomly assigned to training, validation, or evaluation groups repeatedly, to create 50 dataset combinations that were classified into five groups of 10 different dataset combinations with the same evaluation datasets. The CNN learned using training-group images and labels. Validation datasets were used to choose the model that best classified evaluation images as responders or non-responders. RESULTS: Of 110 tumors, 57 were classified as responders, and 53 as non-responders. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of each CNN model for 50 dataset combinations ranged from 0.602 [95% confidence interval (CI)=36.5-83.9%] to 0.826 [95% CI, 64.3-100%]. The AUC of ensemble models, which averaged prediction results of 10 individual models within the same group, ranged from 0.761 (95% CI=55.2-97.1%) to 0.856 (95% CI=68.2-100%). CONCLUSION: A CNN-based ensemble radiomics model accurately predicted SRS responses of unlearned BM images. Thus, CNN models are able to predict SRS prognoses from small datasets. Copyright
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether radiomic phenotypes of brain metastases (BM) are related to radiation therapy prognosis. This study assessed whether a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based radiomics model which learned computer tomography (CT) image features with minimal preprocessing, could predict early response of BM to radiosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Tumor images of 110 BM post stereotactic-radiosurgery (SRS) (within 3 months) were assessed (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor, version 1.1) as responders (complete or partial response) or non-responders (stable or progressive disease). Datasets were axial planning CT images containing the tumor center, and the tumor response. Datasets were randomly assigned to training, validation, or evaluation groups repeatedly, to create 50 dataset combinations that were classified into five groups of 10 different dataset combinations with the same evaluation datasets. The CNN learned using training-group images and labels. Validation datasets were used to choose the model that best classified evaluation images as responders or non-responders. RESULTS: Of 110 tumors, 57 were classified as responders, and 53 as non-responders. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of each CNN model for 50 dataset combinations ranged from 0.602 [95% confidence interval (CI)=36.5-83.9%] to 0.826 [95% CI, 64.3-100%]. The AUC of ensemble models, which averaged prediction results of 10 individual models within the same group, ranged from 0.761 (95% CI=55.2-97.1%) to 0.856 (95% CI=68.2-100%). CONCLUSION: A CNN-based ensemble radiomics model accurately predicted SRS responses of unlearned BM images. Thus, CNN models are able to predict SRS prognoses from small datasets. Copyright
Authors: Khaled Bousabarah; Maximilian Ruge; Julia-Sarita Brand; Mauritius Hoevels; Daniel Rueß; Jan Borggrefe; Nils Große Hokamp; Veerle Visser-Vandewalle; David Maintz; Harald Treuer; Martin Kocher Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Darius Kalasauskas; Michael Kosterhon; Naureen Keric; Oliver Korczynski; Andrea Kronfeld; Florian Ringel; Ahmed Othman; Marc A Brockmann Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 6.639