Literature DB >> 30193984

C1 fracture: Analysis of consolidation and complications rates in a prospective multicenter series.

Maxime Lleu1, Yann Philippe Charles2, Benjamin Blondel3, Laurent Barresi4, Benjamin Nicot5, Vincent Challier6, Joël Godard7, Pascal Kouyoumdjian8, Nicolas Lonjon9, Paulo Marinho10, Eurico Freitas11, Sébastien Schuller2, Stéphane Fuentes3, Jérémy Allia4, Julien Berthiller12, Cédric Barrey11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Three types of C1 fracture have been described, according to location: type 1 (anterior or posterior arc), type 2 (Jefferson: anterior and posterior arc), and type 3 (lateral mass). Stability depends on transverse ligament integrity. The main aim of the present study was to analyze complications and consolidation rates according to fracture type, age and treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The French Society of Spinal Surgery (SFCR) performed a multicenter prospective study on C1-C2 trauma. All patients with recent fracture diagnosed on CT were included. Consolidation on CT was studied at 3 months and 1 year. Medical, neurologic, infectious and mechanical complications were inventoried using the KEOPS data-base.
RESULTS: Sixty-three of the 417 patients (15.1%) had C1 fracture: type 1 (33.3%), type 2 (38.1%), or type 3 (28.6%). The transverse ligament was intact in 53.9% of cases. Treatment was non-operative in 63.5% of cases, surgical in 27.0%, and surgical after failure of non-operative treatment in 9.5%. There were 8 medical complications, more frequently in patients aged >70 years, following surgery (p<0.0001). The consolidation rate was 84.2% with non-operative treatment, 100% for primary surgery, and 33.3% for secondary surgery (p=0.002). There were 10 cases of non-union, in 4.8% of type 1, 13.6% of type 2 and 33.3% of type 3 fractures (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Medical complications showed association with age and with type of treatment. Non-operative treatment was suited to types 1, 2 and 3 with minimal displacement and intact transverse ligament. C1-C2 fusion was suited to displaced unstable type 2 fracture. Displaced type 3 fracture incurred risk of non-union. Early surgery may be recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atlas; C1 fracture; Complications; Consolidation; Non-union

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193984     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  5 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of isolated C1 fractures: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kyle Samuel Chan; Nathan A Shlobin; Nader S Dahdaleh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

2.  Direct Fixation of C1 Jefferson Fracture Using C1 Lateral Mass Screws: A Case Report.

Authors:  Aravind Kumar; James Onggo; Lim Hai Fon; Jacob Oh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-08-31

3.  Hemiparesis resulting from an unusual C1 fracture: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Yuh; Zhi Wang; Ghassan Boubez; Daniel Shedid
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-12-22

4.  Epidemiology of atlas fractures in the United States: A 20-year analysis.

Authors:  Joseph Gabriel Lyons; Humza Moghis Mian
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-03-09

5.  Motion-preserving treatment of unstable atlas fracture: transoral anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis using a laminoplasty plate.

Authors:  Xiaobao Zou; Beiping Ouyang; Binbin Wang; Haozhi Yang; Su Ge; Yuyue Chen; Ling Ni; Shuang Zhang; Hong Xia; Zenghui Wu; Xiangyang Ma
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.