Literature DB >> 30193974

Sparse wars: A survey and comparative study of spherical deconvolution algorithms for diffusion MRI.

Erick Jorge Canales-Rodríguez1, Jon Haitz Legarreta2, Marco Pizzolato3, Gaëtan Rensonnet4, Gabriel Girard3, Jonathan Rafael- Patino3, Muhamed Barakovic3, David Romascano3, Yasser Alemán-Gómez5, Joaquim Radua6, Edith Pomarol-Clotet7, Raymond Salvador7, Jean-Philippe Thiran8, Alessandro Daducci9.   

Abstract

Spherical deconvolution methods are widely used to estimate the brain's white-matter fiber orientations from diffusion MRI data. In this study, eight spherical deconvolution algorithms were implemented and evaluated. These included two model selection techniques based on the extended Bayesian information criterion (i.e., best subset selection and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator), iteratively reweighted l2- and l1-norm approaches to approximate the l0-norm, sparse Bayesian learning, Cauchy deconvolution, and two accelerated Richardson-Lucy algorithms. Results from our exhaustive evaluation show that there is no single optimal method for all different fiber configurations, suggesting that further studies should be conducted to find the optimal way of combining solutions from different methods. We found l0-norm regularization algorithms to resolve more accurately fiber crossings with small inter-fiber angles. However, in voxels with very dominant fibers, algorithms promoting more sparsity are less accurate in detecting smaller fibers. In most cases, the best algorithm to reconstruct fiber crossings with two fibers did not perform optimally in voxels with one or three fibers. Therefore, simplified validation systems as employed in a number of previous studies, where only two fibers with similar volume fractions were tested, should be avoided as they provide incomplete information. Future studies proposing new reconstruction methods based on high angular resolution diffusion imaging data should validate their results by considering, at least, voxels with one, two, and three fibers, as well as voxels with dominant fibers and different diffusion anisotropies.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Diffusion MRI; LASSO; Non-negative least squares; Sparse regression; Spherical deconvolution

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193974     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  7 in total

1.  Histologically derived fiber response functions for diffusion MRI vary across white matter fibers-An ex vivo validation study in the squirrel monkey brain.

Authors:  Kurt G Schilling; Yurui Gao; Iwona Stepniewska; Vaibhav Janve; Bennett A Landman; Adam W Anderson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Towards microstructure fingerprinting: Estimation of tissue properties from a dictionary of Monte Carlo diffusion MRI simulations.

Authors:  Gaëtan Rensonnet; Benoît Scherrer; Gabriel Girard; Aleksandar Jankovski; Simon K Warfield; Benoît Macq; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Maxime Taquet
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  A machine learning-based method for estimating the number and orientations of major fascicles in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Davood Karimi; Lana Vasung; Camilo Jaimes; Fedel Machado-Rivas; Shadab Khan; Simon K Warfield; Ali Gholipour
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 13.828

4.  The Dmipy Toolbox: Diffusion MRI Multi-Compartment Modeling and Microstructure Recovery Made Easy.

Authors:  Rutger H J Fick; Demian Wassermann; Rachid Deriche
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.081

5.  Comparison of diffusion MRI and CLARITY fiber orientation estimates in both gray and white matter regions of human and primate brain.

Authors:  C Leuze; M Goubran; M Barakovic; M Aswendt; Q Tian; B Hsueh; A Crow; E M M Weber; G K Steinberg; M Zeineh; E D Plowey; A Daducci; G Innocenti; J-P Thiran; K Deisseroth; J A McNab
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Insights from the IronTract challenge: Optimal methods for mapping brain pathways from multi-shell diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Chiara Maffei; Gabriel Girard; Kurt G Schilling; Dogu Baran Aydogan; Nagesh Adluru; Andrey Zhylka; Ye Wu; Matteo Mancini; Andac Hamamci; Alessia Sarica; Achille Teillac; Steven H Baete; Davood Karimi; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Mert E Yildiz; Ali Gholipour; Yann Bihan-Poudec; Bassem Hiba; Andrea Quattrone; Aldo Quattrone; Tommy Boshkovski; Nikola Stikov; Pew-Thian Yap; Alberto de Luca; Josien Pluim; Alexander Leemans; Vivek Prabhakaran; Barbara B Bendlin; Andrew L Alexander; Bennett A Landman; Erick J Canales-Rodríguez; Muhamed Barakovic; Jonathan Rafael-Patino; Thomas Yu; Gaëtan Rensonnet; Simona Schiavi; Alessandro Daducci; Marco Pizzolato; Elda Fischi-Gomez; Jean-Philippe Thiran; George Dai; Giorgia Grisot; Nikola Lazovski; Santi Puch; Marc Ramos; Paulo Rodrigues; Vesna Prčkovska; Robert Jones; Julia Lehman; Suzanne N Haber; Anastasia Yendiki
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 7.400

7.  Motor and higher-order functions topography of the human dentate nuclei identified with tractography and clustering methods.

Authors:  Fulvia Palesi; Matteo Ferrante; Marta Gaviraghi; Anastasia Misiti; Giovanni Savini; Alessandro Lascialfari; Egidio D'Angelo; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 5.038

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.