Literature DB >> 30193971

Ovarian Reserve Following Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy vs Cyst Deroofing for Endometriomas.

Mohamed S Sweed1, Ahmed K Makled2, Medhat A El-Sayed2, Mohamed E Shawky2, Hamdy A Abd-Elhady2, Ahmed M Mansour2, Radwa M Mohamed2, Hossam Hemeda2, Eman A Nasr-Eldin3, Neveen S Attia2, Ebtihal Eltaieb2, Heba Allam2, Ahmed Hussein2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Because laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy of endometriomas is known to adversely impact patient ovarian reserve, the search for other techniques of surgical management is ongoing. The present study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic cyst deroofing as a feasible alternative. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).
SETTING: University maternity hospital. PATIENTS: Women diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral ovarian endometriomas.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were managed with either laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy or cyst deroofing.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 122 women with endometriomas were randomized to either laparoscopic cystectomy (group 1) or laparoscopic cyst deroofing (group 2). The primary endpoint was the effect on ovarian reserve based on changes in anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) values. At 1 month postsurgery, anti-Müllerian hormone values were significantly decreased (p < .001) from preoperative values, from 4.25 ± 0.87 ng/mL to 1.66 ± 1.02 ng/mL in group 1 and from 4.2 ± 1.69 ng/mL to 2.15 ± 1.48 ng/mL in group 2. In addition, antral follicle count and ovarian volume decreased significantly (p < .001) in both groups by 1 month postsurgery. The decreases in these 3 parameters were more significant (p < .001) in group 1 than in group 2.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cyst deroofing of endometriomas appears to be a promising alternative to laparoscopic cystectomy, with less postoperative decrease in ovarian reserve; however, the higher rate of endometrioma recurrence warrants future clinical research to determine the optimal surgical management of endometriomas.
Copyright © 2018 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-Müllerian hormone; Antral follicle count; Ovarian volume

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193971     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  2 in total

1.  Preservation of Ovarian Reserve after Laparoscopic Cystectomy.

Authors:  Christos Iavazzo; Nikolaos Vrachnis; Ioannis D Gkegkes
Journal:  J Menopausal Med       Date:  2022-04

2.  Ovarian Endometrioma Negatively Impacts Oocyte Quality and Quantity But Not Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yaoqiu Wu; Rong Yang; Jie Lan; Haiyan Lin; Xuedan Jiao; Qingxue Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 5.555

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.