Literature DB >> 30193837

Matrix mineralization controls gene expression in osteoblastic cells.

Johannes Wischmann1, Florian Lenze1, Antonia Thiel1, Sakina Bookbinder2, William Querido2, Oxana Schmidt3, Rainer Burgkart1, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe1, Günther H S Richter3, Nancy Pleshko2, Philipp Mayer-Kuckuk4.   

Abstract

Osteoblasts are adherent cells, and under physiological conditions they attach to both mineralized and non-mineralized osseous surfaces. However, how exactly osteoblasts respond to these different osseous surfaces is largely unknown. Our hypothesis was that the state of matrix mineralization provides a functional signal to osteoblasts. To assess the osteoblast response to mineralized compared to demineralized osseous surfaces, we developed and validated a novel tissue surface model. We demonstrated that with the exception of the absence of mineral, the mineralized and demineralized surfaces were similar in molecular composition as determined, for example, by collagen content and maturity. Subsequently, we used the human osteoblastic cell line MG63 in combination with genome-wide gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to record and compare the gene expression signatures on mineralized and demineralized surfaces. Assessment of the 5 most significant gene sets showed on mineralized surfaces an enrichment exclusively of genes sets linked to protein synthesis, while on the demineralized surfaces 3 of the 5 enriched gene sets were associated with the matrix. Focusing on these three gene sets, we observed not only the expected structural components of the bone matrix, but also gene products, such as HMCN1 or NID2, that are likely to act as temporal migration guides. Together, these findings suggest that in osteoblasts mineralized and demineralized osseous surfaces favor intracellular protein production and matrix formation, respectively. Further, they demonstrate that the mineralization state of bone independently controls gene expression in osteoblastic cells.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Bone matrix; Bone mineral; Gene Regulation; Osteoblast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30193837      PMCID: PMC6185740          DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Cell Res        ISSN: 0014-4827            Impact factor:   3.905


  33 in total

1.  Validation of the sterilization procedure of allogeneic avital bone transplants using peracetic acid-ethanol.

Authors:  A Pruss; B Baumann; M Seibold; M Kao; K Tintelnot; R von Versen; H Radtke; T Dörner; G Pauli; U B Göbel
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.856

Review 2.  The importance of mineral in bone and mineral research.

Authors:  B D Boyan; Z Schwartz; A L Boskey
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Building strong bones: molecular regulation of the osteoblast lineage.

Authors:  Fanxin Long
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  In search of an osteoblast cell model for in vitro research.

Authors:  E M Czekanska; M J Stoddart; R G Richards; J S Hayes
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.942

5.  Loss of nidogen-1 and -2 results in syndactyly and changes in limb development.

Authors:  Kerstin Böse; Roswitha Nischt; Anton Page; Bernhard L Bader; Mats Paulsson; Neil Smyth
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gene expression of MC3T3-E1 cells on fibronectin-immobilized titanium using tresyl chloride activation technique.

Authors:  Kamolparn Pugdee; Yasuko Shibata; Nobuyuki Yamamichi; Haruhiko Tsutsumi; Masao Yoshinari; Yoshimitsu Abiko; Tohru Hayakawa
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Quiescent Bone Lining Cells Are a Major Source of Osteoblasts During Adulthood.

Authors:  Igor Matic; Brya G Matthews; Xi Wang; Nathaniel A Dyment; Daniel L Worthley; David W Rowe; Danka Grcevic; Ivo Kalajzic
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 9.  Regulation of osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling by HIFs and VEGF.

Authors:  Ernestina Schipani; Christa Maes; Geert Carmeliet; Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  It Takes Two to Tango: Coupling of Angiogenesis and Osteogenesis for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Andrea Grosso; Maximilian G Burger; Alexander Lunger; Dirk J Schaefer; Andrea Banfi; Nunzia Di Maggio
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2017-11-03
View more
  2 in total

1.  Near infrared spectroscopic assessment of loosely and tightly bound cortical bone water.

Authors:  Ramyasri Ailavajhala; William Querido; Chamith S Rajapakse; Nancy Pleshko
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  Whole-Exome Sequencing Reveals Rare Germline Mutations in Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia.

Authors:  Xiaojun Chen; Fatao Liu; Zin Mar Aung; Yan Zhang; Gang Chai
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.599

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.