Literature DB >> 30192641

Discretionary Surgery: A Comparison of Workers' Compensation and Commercial Insurance.

Bonheur A T D van der Gronde1, Tom J Crijns1, David Ring1, Nina Leung1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Workers' compensation is intended for injuries that occur at work and is expected to be mostly for trauma and mostly nondiscretionary conditions. We tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the ratio of likely discretionary to likely nondiscretionary surgery between patients treated under workers' compensation compared with commercial insurance controlling for age, sex, and anatomical site for either traumatic or nontraumatic diagnoses.
METHODS: Using claims data from the Texas workers' compensation database and Truven Health commercial claims we classified International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnoses and procedure codes as likely discretionary or likely nondiscretionary, and as traumatic or nontraumatic. Ratios of likely discretionary to likely nondiscretionary surgery were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Among patients treated under workers' compensation, the ratio of likely discretionary to likely nondiscretionary surgery was significantly higher for traumatic diagnoses (0.57 [95% confidence interval, CI, = 0.56-0.61] vs 0.38 [95% CI = 0.37-0.40], P < .05) and significantly lower for nontraumatic diagnoses (9.4 [95% CI = 9.20-9.42] vs 13.2 [95% CI = 12.9-13.3], P < .05) compared with commercial insurance.
CONCLUSIONS: Workers' compensation often covers likely discretionary musculoskeletal surgery, and insurance type may influence treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  commercial insurance; discretionary surgery; nontraumatic; traumatic; workers’ compensation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30192641      PMCID: PMC6346365          DOI: 10.1177/1558944718799392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  13 in total

1.  Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing.

Authors:  T Skov; J Deddens; M R Petersen; L Endahl
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Editorial: How the Words We Use Affect the Care We Deliver.

Authors:  David C Ring; Matthew B Dobbs; Terence J Gioe; Paul A Manner; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Factors Associated With Radiographic Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis in Patients Not Seeking Care for This Condition.

Authors:  Suzanne C Wilkens; Matthew A Tarabochia; David Ring; Neal C Chen
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-09-16

4.  What happens to patients when we do not repair their cuff tears? Five-year rotator cuff quality-of-life index outcomes following nonoperative treatment of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Richard S Boorman; Kristie D More; Robert M Hollinshead; James P Wiley; Nicholas G Mohtadi; Ian K Y Lo; Kelly R Brett
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Correspondence of patient word choice with psychologic factors in patients with upper extremity illness.

Authors:  Arjan G J Bot; Ana-Maria Vranceanu; James H Herndon; David C Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age.

Authors:  Teun Teunis; Bart Lubberts; Brian T Reilly; David Ring
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 7.  Management of rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Christopher C Schmidt; Claudius D Jarrett; Brandon T Brown
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Patients Older Than 40 Years With Unilateral Occupational Claims for New Shoulder and Knee Symptoms Have Bilateral MRI Changes.

Authors:  Tiffany C Liu; Nina Leung; Leonard Edwards; David Ring; Edward Bernacki; Melissa D Tonn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: appropriate use criteria.

Authors:  Christopher C Schmidt; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Clinical and structural outcomes of nonoperative management of massive rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  P O Zingg; B Jost; A Sukthankar; M Buhler; C W A Pfirrmann; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reoperation After Operative Fixation of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fractures.

Authors:  Kamilcan Oflazoglu; Suzanne C Wilkens; Hinne Rakhorst; David Ring; Neal C Chen
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-07-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.