RATIONALE: Eosinophils drive pathophysiology in stable and exacerbating eosinophilic asthma, and therefore treatment is focused on the reduction of eosinophil numbers. Mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes IL-5 and efficiently attenuates eosinophils, proved clinically effective in severe eosinophilic asthma but not in mild asthma. OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of mepolizumab on virus-induced immune responses in mild asthma. METHODS:Patients with mild asthma, steroid-naive and randomized for eosinophil numbers, received 750 mg mepolizumab intravenously in a placebo-controlled double-blind trial, 2 weeks after which patients were challenged with rhinovirus (RV) 16. FEV1, FVC, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, symptom scores (asthma control score), viral load (PCR), eosinophil numbers, humoral (luminex, ELISA), and cellular (flow cytometry) immune parameters in blood, BAL fluid, and sputum, before and after mepolizumab and RV16, were assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Mepolizumab attenuated baseline blood eosinophils and their activation, attenuated trendwise sputum eosinophils, and enhanced circulating natural killer cells. Mepolizumab did not affect FEV1, FVC, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, neither at baseline nor after RV16. On RV16 challenge mepolizumab did not prevent eosinophil activation but did enhance local B lymphocytes and macrophages and reduce neutrophils and their activation. Mepolizumab also enhanced secretory IgA and reduced tryptase in BAL fluid. Finally, mepolizumab affected particularly RV16-induced macrophage inflammatory protein-3a, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, and IL-1RA production in BAL fluid. CONCLUSIONS:Mepolizumab failed to prevent activation of remaining eosinophils and changed RV16-induced immune responses in mild asthma. Although these latter effects likely are caused by attenuated eosinophil numbers, we cannot exclude a role for basophils. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01520051).
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Eosinophils drive pathophysiology in stable and exacerbating eosinophilic asthma, and therefore treatment is focused on the reduction of eosinophil numbers. Mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that neutralizes IL-5 and efficiently attenuates eosinophils, proved clinically effective in severe eosinophilic asthma but not in mild asthma. OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of mepolizumab on virus-induced immune responses in mild asthma. METHODS:Patients with mild asthma, steroid-naive and randomized for eosinophil numbers, received 750 mg mepolizumab intravenously in a placebo-controlled double-blind trial, 2 weeks after which patients were challenged with rhinovirus (RV) 16. FEV1, FVC, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, symptom scores (asthma control score), viral load (PCR), eosinophil numbers, humoral (luminex, ELISA), and cellular (flow cytometry) immune parameters in blood, BAL fluid, and sputum, before and after mepolizumab and RV16, were assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Mepolizumab attenuated baseline blood eosinophils and their activation, attenuated trendwise sputum eosinophils, and enhanced circulating natural killer cells. Mepolizumab did not affect FEV1, FVC, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, neither at baseline nor after RV16. On RV16 challenge mepolizumab did not prevent eosinophil activation but did enhance local B lymphocytes and macrophages and reduce neutrophils and their activation. Mepolizumab also enhanced secretory IgA and reduced tryptase in BAL fluid. Finally, mepolizumab affected particularly RV16-induced macrophage inflammatory protein-3a, vascular endothelial growth factor-A, and IL-1RA production in BAL fluid. CONCLUSIONS:Mepolizumab failed to prevent activation of remaining eosinophils and changed RV16-induced immune responses in mild asthma. Although these latter effects likely are caused by attenuated eosinophil numbers, we cannot exclude a role for basophils. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01520051).
Entities:
Keywords:
exacerbation; loss of asthma control; mepolizumab; rhinovirus 16 challenge
Authors: Peter W Heymann; Thomas A E Platts-Mills; Judith A Woodfolk; Larry Borish; Deborah D Murphy; Holliday T Carper; Mark R Conaway; John W Steinke; Lyndsey Muehling; W Gerald Teague; Joshua L Kennedy; Anne-Marie Irani; Matthew D McGraw; Stephen V Early; Lisa M Wheatley; Amy P Adams; Ronald B Turner Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Michal Podrazil; Pavla Taborska; Dmitry Stakheev; Michal Rataj; Jan Lastovicka; Alena Vlachova; Petr Pohunek; Jirina Bartunkova; Daniel Smrz Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 8.786
Authors: Abilash Ravi; Saheli Chowdhury; Annemiek Dijkhuis; Barbara S Dierdorp; Tamara Dekker; Rianne Kruize; Yanaika S Sabogal Piñeros; Christof J Majoor; Peter J Sterk; René Lutter Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2022-04-19