Literature DB >> 30192368

Complications of 2-Level Dynamic Stabilization: A Correlative Clinical and Radiological Analysis at Two-Year Follow-up on 103 Patients.

Necati Mert Ciplak1, Tuncer Suzer, Salim Senturk, Onur Yaman, Mehdi Sasani, Tunc Oktenoglu, Atilla Yilmaz, Deniz Ufuk Erbulut, Ali Fahir Özer.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the postoperative complications, such as screw loosening, screw breakage and adjacent segment disease (ASD), in patients who underwent surgery with 2-level dynamic stabilization systems.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Postoperative complications, clinical improvements and radiological parameters in patients who underwent surgery using a dynamic system for 2-level lumbar stabilization were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 103 patients with lumbar degenerative spinal instability underwent 2-level dynamic stabilization. Clinical findings were reviewed at 2-year followup. Screw breakage and loosening were evaluated during this duration together with clinical findings.
RESULTS: Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were significantly decreased at the four-month evaluation, and they were also decreased at the 1-year follow up and at the 24th postoperative month. ASD was diagnosed in twelve (8 females, 4 males) of the 103 patients in the follow-up radiological and clinical controls. There were 9 screw breakages and 4 screw loosening cases. The complication rate of 2-level dynamic stabilization was high in this study.
CONCLUSION: Our results showed that complications (screw loosening or breakage and adjacent segment disease) are not rare after 2-level dynamic stabilization, unlike the acceptable results with the single-level dynamic system. The most probable explanation is that the instrument system behaves more rigidly with every additional segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30192368     DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.21036-17.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Neurosurg        ISSN: 1019-5149            Impact factor:   1.003


  6 in total

1.  Lumbar Dynamic Stabilization With 2-Stage Surgery: Early Results.

Authors:  Ali Fahir Özer; Ahmet Tulgar Başak; Muhammet Arif Özbek; Mehdi Hekimoğlu; Ahmet Levent Aydın; Özkan Ateş; Caner Günerbüyük; Turgut Akgül; Mehdi Sasani; Tunç Öktenoğlu
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  A Hybrid Uniplanar Pedicle Screw System with a New Intermediate Screw for Minimally Invasive Spinal Fixation: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Jia Li; Li-Cheng Zhang; Jiantao Li; Hao Zhang; Jing-Xin Zhao; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Biomechanical influence of the surgical approaches, implant length and density in stabilizing ankylosing spondylitis cervical spine fracture.

Authors:  Yaoyao Liu; Zhong Wang; Mingyong Liu; Xiang Yin; Jiming Liu; Jianhua Zhao; Peng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Should Iliac Wing Screws Be Included in Long Segment Dynamic Stabilization?

Authors:  Ali Fahir Özer; Ahmet Levent Aydın; Mehdi Hekimoğlu; Önder Çerezci; Ahmet T Başak; Ozkan Ates; Tunc Oktenoglu; Mehdi Sasani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-24

5.  Patterns of Lumbar Disc Degeneration: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis in Symptomatic Subjects.

Authors:  Monchai Ruangchainikom; Michael D Daubs; Akinobu Suzuki; Chengjie Xiong; Tetsuo Hayashi; Trevor P Scott; Kevin Phan; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-12-28

6.  Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Hongbo Wang; Jun Peng; Qingshen Zeng; Yanchun Zhong; Chunlin Xiao; Yongjun Ye; Weimin Huang; Wuyang Liu; Jiaquan Luo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.