Literature DB >> 30191621

Predictive value of combined analysis of pro-NPY and ERG in localized prostate cancer.

Gitte Kristensen1, Martin Andreas Røder1, Kasper Drimer Berg1, Johanna Elversang2, Diego Iglesias-Gato3, José Moreira3, Birgitte Grønkaer Toft2, Klaus Brasso1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate if combined analysis of pro-Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and ERG expression in tumor tissue are associated with biochemical failure (BF), castration-based treatment, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and prostate cancer (PCa)-specific death for men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for PCa. This study included 315 patients, who underwent RP from 2002 to 2005. Both pro-NPY and ERG expression were analyzed using immunohistochemistry and were scored as low or high and negative or positive, respectively. Risk of BF, castration-based treatment, CRPC, and PCa-specific death were analyzed with multiple cause-specific Cox regression analyses and stratified cumulative incidences using competing risk assessment. Median follow-up was 13.0 years (95% CI: 12.7-13.2). In total, 85.7% were pro-NPY high and 14.3% were pro-NPY low. The combined analyses of pro-NPY and ERG expression was not associated with risk of BF (p = 0.7), castration-based treatment (p = 0.8), CRPC (p = 0.4) or PCa-specific death (p = 0.5). In the multiple cause-specific Cox regression analysis, pro-NPY high and ERG positivity was not associated with BF (HR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.6-1.7; p = 0.94). In conclusion the combination of pro-NPY and ERG expression did not show association with risk of BF, castration-based treatment, CRPC, and PCa-specific death following RP.
© 2018 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERG; predictive biomarkers; pro-NPY; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30191621     DOI: 10.1111/apm.12886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  3 in total

1.  Itraconazole Reverts ABCB1-Mediated Docetaxel Resistance in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Thiago S Lima; Luciano O Souza; Diego Iglesias-Gato; Johanna Elversang; Flemming Steen Jørgensen; Tuula Kallunki; Martin A Røder; Klaus Brasso; José M A Moreira
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 5.988

2.  Validation of the four-miRNA biomarker panel MiCaP for prediction of long-term prostate cancer outcome.

Authors:  Siri H Strand; Linnéa Schmidt; Simone Weiss; Michael Borre; Helle Kristensen; Anne Karin Ildor Rasmussen; Tina Fuglsang Daugaard; Gitte Kristensen; Hein Vincent Stroomberg; Martin Andreas Røder; Klaus Brasso; Peter Mouritzen; Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Investigation of Neural Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer in Context of Neural Density, Perineural Invasion, and Neuroendocrine Profile of Tumors.

Authors:  Dawid Sigorski; Jacek Gulczyński; Aleksandra Sejda; Wojciech Rogowski; Ewa Iżycka-Świeszewska
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.