| Literature DB >> 30191479 |
Kun Wang1,2, Jiang Cheng1,2, Xin Yang1,2, Rong Hu2, Lijuan Fu1, Jiang Huang1, Junsheng Yu1,2, Lu Li3.
Abstract
Poor thermostability of Sb2S3 in vacuum hinders the possibility of achieving high-quality crystalline films. In order to enhance the photovoltaic properties of Sb2S3 planar heterojunction solar cells, a selenylation-based post-treatment approach has been employed. Selenylation performed over 15 min on the Sb2S3 film resulted in an enhancement in the conversion efficiency from ~ 0.01 to 2.20%. Effect of the selenylation on the evolution of morphology, crystal structure, composition distributions, and photovoltaic behavior has been investigated. The variation in the energy levels of Sb2S3/CdS junction has been also been discussed. Results show that selenylation not only enhanced the crystallinity of Sb2S3 film but also provided a suitable energy level which facilitated charge transport from absorber to the buffer layer.Entities:
Keywords: Antimony chalcogenide; Energy level; Sb2S3 solar cell; Selenylation; Thermal evaporation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30191479 PMCID: PMC6127074 DOI: 10.1186/s11671-018-2651-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanoscale Res Lett ISSN: 1556-276X Impact factor: 4.703
Fig. 1Device fabrication and photovoltaic performance. a Schematic diagram of the fabrication of selenized Sb2S3 photovoltaic devices. b J-V characteristics under illumination. c EQE of Sb2S3 photovoltaic devices under different treatment conditions
The performances of Sb2S3 solar cells fabricated with different treatment conditions
| Treatment | FF (%) | PCE (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.05 | 24.08 ± 2.55 | ≤ 0.01 | 1893 | 1721 |
| Annealed 10 min | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.19 | 39.01 ± 1.73 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 245 | 1978 |
| Selenized 10 min | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 7.80 ± 0.33 | 42.45 ± 0.86 | 1.57 ± 0.06 | 20 | 186 |
| Selenized 15 min | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 8.78 ± 0.26 | 46.35 ± 1.13 | 2.13 ± 0.07 | 15 | 188 |
| Selenized 20 min | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 5.13 ± 0.49 | 38.72 ± 3.28 | 0.61 ± 0.26 | 41 | 224 |
Fig. 2Crystal structure characterization of Sb2S3(Se) films. a XRD patterns of the Sb2S3 films under various treatment conditions. b Enlarged (120) XRD peaks of the same films as in a
Fig. 3Top-view SEM images of Sb2S3 films under various treatment conditions. a Untreated. b Vacuum annealed. c Selenized for 15 min. d Selenized for 20 min
Fig. 4Energy level analysis of Sb2S3(Se) solar cells. a Ultraviolet–visible near infrared transmission spectroscopy (b) variation of (αhv)2 as a function of the photon energy (hv) of Sb2S3 films under different treatment conditions. c PL spectrum of vacuum prepared Sb2S3, Sb2S3(Se), and Sb2Se3 films. UPS spectra of d Sb2Se3, e Sb2S3, and f CdS. g Model of composition distribution and h energy levels along vertical depth of selenized Sb2S3 film. i An image of selenized Sb2S3 devices sample
Energy band information calculated from UPS spectra
| Materials | VBM (eV) | Ws (eV) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CdS | 2.40 | 1.87 | 4.70 | − 4.17 | − 6.57 |
| Sb2Se3 | 1.21 | 0.52 | 4.45 | − 3.76 | − 5.08 |
| Sb2S3 | 1.61 | 1.02 | 4.35 | − 3.76 | − 5.37 |
Fig. 5Impedance spectra of Sb2S3 under various treatment conditions measured in the dark, inset showing the overall narrowing diagram and equivalent circuit
Calculation result of equivalent circuit parameters from the fitted impedance spectrum
| Absorber |
| CPE1-T | CPE1-P |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated | 519.8 | 1.38 | 0.96 | 26,666 |
| Annealed 10 min | 10.0 | 1.86 | 0.94 | 2358 |
| Selenized 15 min | 0.4 | 1.74 | 0.95 | 405.3 |
| Selenized 20 min | 815.5 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 426.3 |