| Literature DB >> 30190731 |
Xia Zheng1, Zhiquan Lv2, Kaiyu Yin3, Mingqing Peng4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of epidural anesthesia combined with inhalation or intravenous anesthesia on intrapulmonary shunt and oxygenation in patients undergoing long term single lung ventilation.Entities:
Keywords: Anesthesia; One-lung ventilation; Oxygenation; Pulmonary shunt
Year: 2018 PMID: 30190731 PMCID: PMC6115586 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.344.14585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pak J Med Sci ISSN: 1681-715X Impact factor: 1.088
Demographic data, procedure length of the subjects.
| Group Pro (n=20) | Group Pro+Epi (n=20) | Group Iso (n=20) | Group Iso+Epi (n=20) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 12/18 | 15/15 | 14/16 | 17/13 | 17/13 |
| Years | 55±7 | 51±9 | 52±8 | 53±9 | 53±9 |
| Weight (kg) | 63±5 | 66±7 | 58±4 | 71±6 | 71±6 |
| Length procedure (min) | 220±30 | 265±28 | 238±26 | 315±35 | 315±35 |
| ASA | |||||
| I | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| II | 12 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 11 |
| III | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Comparison of intrapulmonary shunt and oxygenation among the four groups (n=20).
| Item | Group | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qs/Qt (%) | Pro | 1.5±0.7 | 18.4±3.6[ | 29.2±3.3[ | 34.1±4.8[ | 29.2±3.8[ | 29.3±24.4[ |
| Pro+Epi | 1.5±0.4 | 18.5±5.7[ | 27.1±3.5[ | 27.4±7.2[ | 29.3±4.7[ | 26.5±1.7[ | |
| Iso | 1.3±0.8 | 22.3±5.7[ | 45.8±13.7[ | 41.0±14.8[ | 42.5±11.5[ | 34.5±4.8[ | |
| Iso+Epi | 1.5±0.5 | 18.6±4.8[ | 34.2±3.6[ | 32.8±7.1[ | 32.5±7.4[ | 29.1±8.9[ | |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | Pro | 83±12 | 390±64[ | 178±77[ | 147±58[ | 150±45[ | 215±67[ |
| Pro+Epi | 85±10 | 425±54[ | 186±83[ | 174±103[ | 162±88[ | 289±30[ | |
| Iso | 85±11 | 423±58[ | 161±35[ | 164±81[ | 177±74[ | 233±94[ | |
| Iso+Epi | 82±10 | 419±84[ | 173±92[ | 146±68[ | 170±72[ | 244±91[ |
Compared with T1,
P<0.05, Compared with T2,
P<0.05, Compared with group Pro, Pro+Epi, Iso+Epi,
P<0.05
Hemodynamic changes of four groups at different time points.
| Group | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CI (L/min/m2) | Pro | 3.1±0.9 | 2.8±0.7 | 2.8±0.8 | 2.6±0.9 | 2.8±0.8 | 3.0±0.7 |
| Pro+Epi | 3.2±0.3 | 3.3±0.4 | 3.1±0.5 | 3.0±0.6 | 2.5±0.8 | 3.0±0.5 | |
| Iso | 3.1±0.5 | 3.2±0.8 | 3.6±0.6[ | 3.7±0.7[ | 3.6±0.7[ | 3.4±0.5[ | |
| Iso+Epi | 3.0±0.5 | 2.8±0.6 | 3.4±0.5[ | 3.3±0.8[ | 3.5±0.6[ | 3.5±0.5[ | |
| MAP (mmHg) | Pro | 96±8 | 90±10 | 92±11 | 89±13 | 97±14 | 93±11 |
| Pro+Epi | 95±10 | 87±8 | 81±10[ | 83±8[ | 82±8[ | 85±10[ | |
| Iso | 87±16 | 95±18 | 98±16 | 92±14 | 89±12 | 93±12 | |
| Iso+Epi | 92±8 | 79±12 | 72±10[ | 70±9[ | 68±12[ | 74±14[ | |
| HR (B/min) | Pro | 76±15 | 71±16 | 72±14 | 76±16 | 72±14 | 75±16 |
| Pro+Epi | 73±12 | 69±11 | 68±10 | 68±8 | 70±11 | 72±12 | |
| Iso | 82±15 | 78±16 | 85±16[ | 90±18[ | 89±17[ | 88±16[ | |
| Iso+Epi | 80±16 | 79±9[ | 72±12 | 78±11[ | 79±14 | 78±16 |
Compared with T1,
P<0.05; group Iso vs. Pro, group Iso+EPi vs. Pro+Epi,
P<0.05; groupIso vs. Iso+Epi, group Pro vs. Pro+Epi,
P<0.05;