| Literature DB >> 30190642 |
Nasser Mohammad Taha1, Hany Taha Asklany1, Adel Hamdy Mahmoud1, Laila Hammoda2, Heba Rady Attallah2, Adel Mohammad Kamel1, Mohammad AbdelKader AbdelWahab1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD) and coronary slow flow (CSF) are frequent angiographic findings for patients that have chest pain and require frequent hospital admission. The retina provides a window for detecting changes in microvasculature relating to the development of cardiovascular diseases such as arterial hypertension or coronary heart disease.Entities:
Keywords: Circulations; Coronary; Coronary slow-flow; Obstructive coronary artery disease; Ocular
Year: 2018 PMID: 30190642 PMCID: PMC6123229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ehj.2018.03.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Egypt Heart J ISSN: 1110-2608
Fig. 1Colour Doppler imaging measures velocity in ophthalmic artery.
Age, fasting blood sugar, blood pressure and body mass index among groups.
| Variable | Group I (OCAD) | Group II (CSF) | Group III (control 1) | Group IV (control 2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 53.5 ± 5.48 | 50.4 ± 7.36 | 51.4 ± 6.53 | 49.5 ± 7.99 |
| FBS (g/dl) | 90.6 ± 9.34 | 91.1 ± 9.13 | 91.4 ± 8.61 | 94.1 ± 10.83 |
| DBP | 77.8 ± 4.94 | 78.3 ± 4.22 | 77.9 ± 4.32 | 73.0 ± 7.27 |
| SBP | 129.7 ± 3.45 | 129.5 ± 3.31 | 129.5 ± 3.97 | 130.3 ± 6.67 |
| BMI | 24.7 ± 1.55 | 26.3 ± 1.4 | 25.1 ± 1.83 | 24.4 ± 1.56 |
FBS (fasting blood sugar), DBP (diastolic blood pressure), SBP (systolic blood pressure), BM1 (body mass index).
Significant versus I.
Significant versus II.
Ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction, and stress ECG parameters among groups.
| Variable | Group II (CSF) | Group I (OCAD) | Group III (control 1) | Group IV (control 2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LV ejection fraction (EF) | 67.5 ± 3.54 | 66.9 ± 5.06 | 66.1 ± 4.31 | 66.8 ± 3.74 | |
| LV diastolic dysfunction | Normal | 4 (13.3%) | 10 (33.3%) | 13 (43.3%) | 5 (33.3%) |
| Grade I | 26 (86.7%) | 20 (66.7%) | 17 (56.7%) | 10 (66.7%) | |
| Stress ECG parameters | DUKE score | −5.28 ± 3.46 | −1.06 ± 2.51 | 10.65 ± 1.72 | – |
| Exercise duration | 8.46 ± 1.79 | 9.21 ± 1.58 | 10.65 ± 1.72 | – | |
Significant versus I.
Significant versus III.
Ophthalmic artery Doppler parameters, and Fluorescein angiography among groups.
| Variable | Group I (OCAD) N = 30 | Group II (CSF) N = 30 | Group III (control 1) | Group IV (control 2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ophth. Art. Doppler | RI | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 0.71 ± 0.01 |
| PI | 1.76 ± 0.02 | 1.78 ± 0.01 | 1.57 ± 0.05 | 1.59 ± 0.03 | |
| Fluorescein angio | ART | 15.6 ± 1.09 | 28.5 ± 4.66 | 12.4 ± 1.68 | 12.9 ± 1.55 |
| AVTT | 1.82 ± 0.14 | 2.86 ± 0.49 | 1.66 ± 0.15 | 1.74 ± 0.18 | |
Resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI), ART (arm- to retinal time) AVTT (arteriovenous transit time).
Significant versus I.
Significant versus II.
Fig. 2TFC among different groups.
Correlations between TFC and other measurements in all studied subjects (3 groups).
| TFC correlations | Correlation coefficient ( | P. value (sig.) |
|---|---|---|
| ART | 0.81 | <0.001 |
| AVTT | 0.77 | <0.001 |
| PI | 0.42 | <0.001 |
| RI | 0.30 | 0.008 |
| BMI | 0.42 | <0.001 |
TFC (TIMI frame count), ART (arm- to retinal time), AVTT (arteriovenous transit time).
PI (pulsatility index), RI (resistance index), BMI (body mass index).
ROC curve analysis of fluorescein angiography for prediction of coronary slow flow.
| Variable | Optimal cut-off point | AUC | P value | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ART | >16 | 1 | <0.001 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| AVTT | >2 | 0.993 | <0.001 | 96.7% | 93.3% | 96.7% | 93.3% | 95.6% |
ART (arm- to retinal time), AVTT (arteriovenous transit time).
Highly significant value.
Fig. 3ROC curve for prediction of coronary slow flow.