| Literature DB >> 30190502 |
Hengrui Chang1,2, Zhanle Zheng1,2, Decheng Shao1,2, Yiyang Yu1,2, Zhiyong Hou1,2, Yingze Zhang3,4.
Abstract
The aim of this prospective study was to determine the incidence of meniscal and cruciate ligament injuries in operative tibial plateau fractures detected using knee arthroscopy, and to identify the radiological predictors observed on CT images. From January 2016 to February 2017, a total of 102 closed tibial plateau fractures were enrolled in this prospective protocol. Each patient underwent arthroscopic examination following the tibial plateau internal fixation. Univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to assess the association between imaging parameters and soft-tissue injuries. The menisci were traumatically injured in 52.9% of subjects (54 of 102) and the cruciate ligaments injured in 22.5% (23 of 102). Significantly higher injury rates for bucket-handle meniscal tears were observed in Schatzker type VI fractures (P = 0.04). Greater risk of lateral meniscus injury was observed in patients with >6.3 mm of lateral joint depression. Greater risk of ACL injury when the volumetric lateral joint depression was ≤209.5 mm2 and/or with >5.7 mm lateral joint widening. Associated meniscal and ligament injuries were commonly seen among operative tibial plateau fractures. Preoperative CT measurements might help predict a higher risk of meniscus and ACL injury, providing guidance to the surgeon to look for and to be prepared to treat such injuries.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30190502 PMCID: PMC6127198 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31705-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A 42-year-old male who sustained a type II fracture of tibial plateau. (A) Coronal reformatted CT image, a = the depth of lateral plateau depression, 18.08 mm; (B) Coronal reformatted CT image, b = lateral plateau widening, 5.73 mm; (C) Axial view of CT image, c = the area of lateral depression, 787.03 mm2.
Figure 2Closed reduction and internal fixation using bidirectional rapid reductor. (A) Intra-operative view of bidirectional rapid reductor; (B) The incisions of the patient who sustained a type VI fracture; (C) The incisions of the patient who sustained a type II fracture.
Arthroscopic findings on abnormal menisci and cruciate ligament.
| Soft tissue injury (n = 70) | Side | Number (n) | Incidence (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Menisci | Contusion | Lateral | 13 | 12.70% |
| (n = 62, 60.8%) | (n = 15, 14.7%) | Medial | 2 | 2.00% |
| Peripheral Tear | Lateral | 21 | 20.60% | |
| (n = 24, 23.5%) | Medial | 3 | 3.00% | |
| Radial Tear | Lateral | 5 | 5.00% | |
| (n = 7, 7.0%) | Medial | 2 | 2.00% | |
| Flap Tear | Lateral | 4 | 4.00% | |
| (n = 4, 4.0%) | Medial | 0 | 0 | |
| Bucket-handle tear | Lateral | 9 | 9.00% | |
| (n = 9, 9.0%) | Medial | 0 | 0 | |
| Horizontal tear | Lateral | 0 | 0 | |
| (n = 2, 2.0%) | Medial | 2 | 2.00% | |
| Degenerative changes | Lateral | 4 | 4.00% | |
| (n = 9, 9.0%) | Medial | 8 | 8.00% | |
| Cruciate ligament | Avulsion Fracture | ACL | 10 | 9.80% |
| (n = 23, 22.5%) | (n = 10, 10.0%) | PCL | 1 | 1.00% |
| Partial Tear | ACL | 3 | 3.00% | |
| (n = 7, 7.0%) | PCL | 4 | 4.00% | |
| Complete Tear | ACL | 2 | 2.00% | |
| (n = 7, 7.0%) | PCL | 5 | 5.00% | |
ACL anterior cruciate ligament, PCL posterior cruciate ligament.
Incidence of traumatic meniscus injuries based on fracture pattern.
| Meniscal pathology | Schatzker classification |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I(n = 4) | II(n = 33) | III(n = 12) | IV(n = 20) | V(n = 18) | VI(n = 15) | ||
| Contusion | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0.95 |
| Peripheral Tear | 1 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0.95 |
| Radial Tear | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.95 |
| Flap Tear | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.88 |
| Bucket-handle tear | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0.04* |
| Horizontal tear | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.87 |
| Total injuries | 1 | 21 | 4 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 0.22 |
Significance is denoted by * at the 0.05 level.
Incidence of cruciate ligament injuries based on fracture pattern.
| Ligament pathology | Schatzker classification |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I(n = 4) | II(n = 33) | III(n = 12) | IV(n = 20) | V(n = 18) | VI(n = 15) | ||
| ACL Avulsion Fracture | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0.08 |
| ACL Patial Tear | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.87 |
| ACL Complete Tear | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.14 |
| PCL Avulsion Fracture | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.68 |
| PCL Patial Tear | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.35 |
| PCL Complete Tear | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.87 |
| Total injuries | 2 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 0.39 |
Differences in patient demographic and radiological characteristics by lateral meniscus lesion.
| Characteristics | lateral meniscus lesion |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n = 49) | No (n = 53) | ||
| Mean age, y | 43.5 ± 12.2 | 43.2 ± 14.0 | 0.71 |
|
| |||
| Male | 37 (75.5) | 42 (79.2) | 0.65 |
| Female | 12 (24.5) | 11 (20.8) | |
|
| |||
| Low | 23 (46.9) | 26 (49.1) | 0.83 |
| High | 26 (53.1) | 27 (50.9) | |
| dLPD, mm | 11.0 ± 7.9 | 6.0 ± 6.3 | <0.01* |
| aLPD, mm2 | 433.7 ± 299.1 | 258.6 ± 250.9 | <0.01* |
| LPW, mm | 7.0 ± 7.4 | 4.6 ± 4.3 | 0.07 |
| dMPD, mm | 0.3 ± 1.5 | 0.4 ± 1.5 | 0.49 |
| aMPD, mm2 | 9.9 ± 61.0 | 20.5 ± 83.7 | 0.45 |
| MPW, mm | 0.1 ± 0.8 | 0.2 ± 1.0 | 0.35 |
dLPD depth of lateral plateau depression, aLPD area of lateral plateau depression, LPW lateral plateau widening, dMPD depth of medial plateau depression, aMPD area of medial plateau depression, MPW medial plateau widening. *p < 0.05.
Differences in patient demographic and radiological characteristics by PCL lesion.
| Characteristics | PCL lesion |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n = 10) | No (n = 92) | ||
| Mean age, y | 42.0 ± 15.5 | 43.5 ± 12.9 | 0.74 |
|
| |||
| Male | 6 (60.0) | 73 (79.3) | 0.22 |
| Female | 4 (40.0) | 19 (20.7) | |
|
| |||
| Low | 5 (50.0) | 44 (47.8) | 1.0 |
| High | 5 (50.0) | 48 (52.2) | |
| dLPD, mm | 8.0 ± 9.8 | 8.4 ± 7.3 | 0.56 |
| aLPD, mm2 | 252.0 ± 79.7 | 291.1 ± 30.3 | 0.36 |
| LPW, mm | 4.7 ± 4.1 | 5.9 ± 5.6 | 0.76 |
| dMPD, mm | 0.4 ± 1.4 | 0.3 ± 1.5 | 0.61 |
| aMPD, mm2 | 17.1 ± 54.2 | 15.2 ± 75.6 | 0.57 |
| MPW, mm | 1.1 ± 2.4 | 0.1 ± 0.4 | <0.01* |
*p < 0.05.
Figure 3(A,B) dLDP and aLPD as models for predicting lateral meniscal injuries.
Predictors of lateral meniscus lesion from multivariate logistic regression.
| Characteristics | OR | 95%CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| dLPD | 4.35 | 1.86–10.17 | 0.001* |
| aLPD | — | — | 0.622 |
CI, confidence interval for odds ratio (OR), —, data not available. *p < 0.05.
Differences in patient demographic and radiological characteristics by medial meniscus lesion.
| Characteristics | medial meniscus lesion |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n = 9) | No (n = 93) | ||
| Mean age, y | 47.6 ± 14.1 | 42.9 ± 13.0 | 0.31 |
|
| |||
| Male | 6 (66.7) | 73 (78.5) | 0.65 |
| Female | 3 (33.3) | 20 (21.5) | |
|
| |||
| Low | 2 (22.2) | 47 (50.5) | 0.16 |
| High | 7 (77.8) | 46 (49.5) | |
| dLPD, mm | 7.5 ± 10.5 | 8.5 ± 7.2 | 0.35 |
| aLPD, mm2 | 221.2 ± 286.0 | 354.5 ± 286.4 | 0.18 |
| LPW, mm | 7.8 ± 8.4 | 5.5 ± 5.1 | 0.62 |
| dMPD, mm | 2.2 ± 3.4 | 0.2 ± 1.0 | <0.01* |
| aMPD, mm2 | 120.0 ± 198.2 | 5.3 ± 36.7 | <0.01* |
| MPW, mm | 0.9 ± 2.0 | 0.1 ± 0.8 | 0.03* |
*p < 0.05.
Differences in patient demographic and radiological characteristics by ACL lesion.
| Characteristics | ACL lesion |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (n = 15) | No (n = 87) | ||
| Mean age, y | 42.5 ± 13.5 | 43.5 ± 13.1 | 0.8 |
|
| |||
| Male | 14 (93.3) | 65 (74.7) | 0.2 |
| Female | 1 (6.7) | 22 (25.3) | |
|
| |||
| Low | 5 (33.3) | 44 (50.6) | 0.22 |
| High | 10 (66.7) | 43 (49.4) | |
| dLPD, mm | 5.9 ± 6.8 | 8.8 ± 7.6 | 0.17 |
| aLPD, mm2 | 203.0 ± 242.2 | 366.8 ± 289.0 | 0.045* |
| LPW, mm | 5.9 ± 6.8 | 5.1 ± 4.7 | 0.026* |
| dMPD, mm | 0.7 ± 1.8 | 0.3 ± 1.4 | 0.21 |
| aMPD, mm2 | 15.7 ± 46.1 | 15.4 ± 77.5 | 0.21 |
| MPW, mm | 0.4 ± 1.5 | 0.1 ± 0.7 | 0.53 |
*p < 0.05.
Figure 4(A,B) aLPD and LPW as models for prediction ACL injuries.
Predictors of ACL lesion from multivariate logistic regression.
| Characteristics | OR | 95%CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| aLPD | 6.81 | 1.80–25.76 | 0.005* |
| LPW | 9.22 | 2.33–36.54 | 0.002* |
CI, confidence interval for odds ratio (OR). *p < 0.05.