| Literature DB >> 30190496 |
Yuan Meng1, Futai Hu1, Yijie Shen1, Yuanmu Yang1, Qirong Xiao1, Xing Fu1, Mali Gong2,3.
Abstract
Graphene distinguishes itself as a promising candidate for realizing tunable integrated photonic devices with high flexibility. We propose a set of ultracompact tunable on-chip waveguide couplers with mode-selectivity and polarization sensitivity around the telecom wavelength of 1.55 μm, under the configuration of graphene-laminated silicon waveguides patterned with gold nanoantennas. Versatile couplings can be achieved in a widely tunable fashion within a deep-subwavelength area (210 × 210 nm2), by marrying the advantages of tight field confinement in plasmonic antennas and the largely tunable carrier density of graphene. Incident light signals can be selectively coupled into different fundamental modes with good mode quality and high directionality exceeding 25 dB. Design scenarios for asymmetric couplings are presented, where the operation wavelength can be tuned across a 107-nm range around 1.55 mm by altering the chemical potential of graphene from 0 to 1.8 eV. Furthermore, the proposed schemes can be leveraged as mode-sensitive on-chip directional waveguide signal detectors with an extinction ratio over 10 dB. Our results provide a new paradigm upon graphene-assisted tunable integrated photonic applications.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30190496 PMCID: PMC6127104 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-31555-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Antenna element design and analysis. (a) Simulation configuration sketch. (b) and (c) Normalized scattering cross-section σs and phase response of the gold antenna as a function of antenna length respectively (fiexed w = h = 50) nm. (d) Antenna tunability analysis. An exemplary l × w × h = 160 × 20 × 50 nm antenna is applied in the simulations for the solid and dashed lines. Antenna structure for green dotted line: l × w′ × h = 160 × 20 × 50 nm (μ = 0 eV) nm for comparison. (e) and (f) The distribution of electric field component E for a l × w′ × h = 160 × 20 × 50 nm gold antenna with the absence and presence of h-BN spacer layer respectively. (g) Resonant wavelength as a function of antenna length corresponding to (b). (f) The illustration of the electric dipole model for directional scattering. (i) Phase responses for two antenna examples. Inset: Corresponding scattering cross-section spectra. Approaching emission strengths are observed between the two antennas around the telecom wavelengths.
Figure 2Single group TE antenna coupler. (a) Perspective view of the proposed device for directional coupling y-polarized incident light into fundamental TE mode to the right port around 1.55 μm. (b) Cross-sectional view of the graphene-hybrid waveguide patterned with gold nanoantennas. Inset: System coordinates. (c) Ex distribution along the waveguide central plane at 1.55 μm. (d) Directivity as a function of antenna center-to-center distance along x axis. (e) Tunability analysis of the proposed device. (f) and (g) Corresponding center operation wavelength λ to (d) and (e) respectively. (h) Transmission rate of the waveguide ports under different incident polarization states. (i) Vector-graph of the electric field distribution at the right port. Inset: distribution details for the antennas along the graphene plane. (j) and (k) distributions for the right and left port respectively.
Figure 3Single group TM antenna coupler. (a) Schematic of the device for coupling x-polarized incident light into left-propagating fundamental TM mode around 1.55 μm. (b) Distribution of electric field component E along the middle waveguide plane. (c) and (d) Electric field norm distribution for the left and right port respectively at 1.55 μm. (e) and (f) Directivity as a function of antenna center-to-center interval and graphene chemical potential respectively. (g) and (h) Corresponding operation wavelength variations for (e) and (f) respectively. (i) Normalized transmission curve for the two waveguide ports under different excitation polarization states. (j) distribution details along graphene plane. (k) Corresponding vector map for (c).
Figure 4Double group TE antenna coupler. (a) Schematic of the device for right-propagating TE mode couplings. (b) Vector diagram for the electric field at the right port. (c) and (d) Electric field norm distribution for the right and left port at 1.55 μm respectively. (e) and (f) Directivity as function of antenna group distance dy and μ respectively. Insets: Variations for operation wavelength λd. (g) Normalized transmission rate for the waveguide ports under different polarization states.
Figure 5(a) and (b) Normalized scattering cross-section and phase response as a function of antenna width (fixed l = 170 nm h = 50 nm and spacer layer thickness 10 nm) under μ = 0.2 eV. (c) Comparison of the distribution for two gold antennas with different aspect ratio. (l × h × w = 170 × 50 × 20 nm and l × h × w = 170 × 50 × 50 nm for the upper and lower panel respectively). (d) and (e) Device structures for directional couplings to left-propagating TE and right-propagating TM mode respectively. The antenna center-to-center distances are 100 nm (d) and 240 nm (e). (f) Tunability illustration of central operation wavelength λd corresponding to (d) and (e). (g) and (h) Directivity curves under different μ for devices sketched in (d) and (e) respectively. (i) and (j) distributions of at the left port for (d) and right port for (e) respectively at 1.55 μm.
Figure 6Ultracompact mode-selective directional waveguide signal detectors. (a) and (c) Tunability analysis for the proposed detectors under the same configurations of Figs 2(a) and 3(a) respectively. (b) and (d) Mode sensitivity analysis for (a) and (c) respectively. (e) Tunability analysis for the device sketched in Fig. S7(f). (f–i) Signal probing performance when fixing μ at 0 eV for the device sketched in Fig. 4(a). (f) Out-coupling efficiency spectrum. (g) Transmission rate of the bus waveguide. (h) and (i) distribution at 1.55 μm for the right and left ports respectively.