| Literature DB >> 30190318 |
Kristina Lore Kunz1,2,3, Guy Claireaux4, Hans-Otto Pörtner2,3, Rainer Knust1, Felix Christopher Mark5.
Abstract
Polar cod (Boreogadus saida) is an important prey species in the Arctic ecosystem, yet its habitat is changing rapidly: climate change, through rising seawater temperatures and CO2 concentrations, is projected to be most pronounced in Arctic waters. This study aimed to investigate the influence of ocean acidification and warming on maximum performance parameters of B. saida as indicators for the species' acclimation capacities under environmental conditions projected for the end of this century. After 4 months at four acclimation temperatures (0, 3, 6, 8°C) each combined with two P CO2 levels (390 and 1170 µatm), aerobic capacities and swimming performance of B. saida were recorded following a U crit protocol. At both CO2 levels, standard metabolic rate (SMR) was elevated at the highest acclimation temperature indicating thermal limitations. Maximum metabolic rate (MMR) increased continuously with temperature, suggesting an optimum temperature for aerobic scope for exercise (ASex) at 6°C. Aerobic swimming performance (U gait) increased with acclimation temperature irrespective of CO2 levels, while critical swimming speed (U crit) did not reveal any clear trend with temperature. Hypercapnia evoked an increase in MMR (and thereby ASex). However, swimming performance (both U gait and U crit) was impaired under elevated near-future P CO2 conditions, indicating reduced efficiencies of oxygen turnover. The contribution of anaerobic metabolism to swimming performance was very low overall, and further reduced under hypercapnia. Our results revealed high sensitivities of maximum performance parameters (MMR, U gait, U crit) of B. saida to ocean acidification. Impaired swimming capacity under ocean acidification may reflect reduced future competitive strength of B. saida.Entities:
Keywords: Aerobic scope; Arctic cod; Climate change; Gadids; Hypercapnia; RCP8.5
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30190318 PMCID: PMC6240293 DOI: 10.1242/jeb.184473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Biol ISSN: 0022-0949 Impact factor: 3.312
Results of two-way ANOVA
Significance levels (adjusted
Summary of respiration measurements and swimming performance results
Summary of anaerobic swimming parameters
Fig. 1.Standard metabolic rate (SMR) and maximum metabolic rate (MMR) in polar cod ( two Boxplots (mean±s.e.m.) of (A) SMR and (B) MMR at four different temperatures and two PCO levels, as indicated. Full data are summarized in Table 3. Letters indicate results of Tukey honest significance test between temperature treatments (SMR: P<0.0001; MMR: P=0.0005). Significant differences are represented by different letters. A significant PCO effect was detected only in MMR (SMR: P=0.343; MMR: P=0.0322); no interaction effect (two-way ANOVA) was observed (SMR: P=0.470; MMR: P=0.2577) (see Table 1). All boxes show 25th and 75th percentiles with median; whiskers are 5th and 95th percentiles.
Fig. 2.Aerobic scope (AS Boxplots (mean±s.e.m) of ASex at four different temperatures and two PCO levels, as indicated. Full data are summarized in Table 3. Letters indicate results of Tukey honest significance test between temperature treatments (P=0.0185). Significant differences are represented by different letters. A significant PCO effect was detected (P=0.0059); no interaction effect (two-way ANOVA) was observed (P=0.1233) (see Table 1).
Fig. 3.Gait transition speed ( Boxplots (mean±s.e.m.) of (A) Ugait and (B) Ucrit (adjusted according to Brett, 1964) at four different temperatures and two PCO levels, as indicated. Filled circles are Ucrit of individuals without burst capacity (not included in statistical analysis). Full data are summarized in Table 3. Letters indicate results of Tukey honest significance test between temperature treatments (Ugait: P=0.0341; Ucrit: P=0.2014). Significant differences are represented by different letters. A significant PCO effect was solely detected in Ugait (Ugait: P=0.0270; Ucrit: P=0.0559); no interaction effect (two-way ANOVA) was observed (Ugait: P=0.8134; Ucrit: P=0.8299) (see Table 1).
Fig. 4.Mean number of bursts per treatment per velocity step (BL s Arrows indicate mean Ucrit per treatment (note that Ucrit values of individuals without burst capacity were included in the calculation of mean Ucrit). Solid lines represent a data fit to a nonlinear regression [mean burst count (U) = a×exp(U×b)]. Dashed lines are 95% confidence intervals (CI) of nonlinear regression. Asterisk indicates significant PCO effect (non-overlapping 95% CI). Letters show results of Tukey honest significance test for maximum burst count (BCmax) between temperature treatments (P=0.0075). Significant differences are represented by different letters. A significant PCO effect was detected for BCmax (P=0.0231); no interaction effect (two-way ANOVA) was observed for BCmax (P=0.3623) (see Table 1).
Fig. 5.Efficiency of maximum swimming performance ( Boxplots (means±s.e.m.) of Emax at four different temperatures and two PCO levels, as indicated. Full data are summarized in Table 3. Letters indicate results of Tukey honest significance test between temperature treatments (P=0.0085). Significant differences are represented by different letters. No significant difference between PCO treatments was found (P=0.1045). An interaction effect (two-way ANOVA) was observed (P=0.0465) (see Table 1).