Literature DB >> 30190110

Extended versus conventional thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal and pelvic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Emanuele Rausa1, Michael E Kelly2, Emanuele Asti3, Alberto Aiolfi3, Gianluca Bonitta3, Desmond C Winter2, Luigi Bonavina3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism, presenting as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, can be associated with considerable morbidity after major abdominal and pelvic surgery. Perioperative thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin is well established, but the duration of treatment remains debated. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of extended (4-week) versus conventional (1-week) thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin in patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery.
METHODS: Using MEDLINE databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science), we conducted an electronic, systematic search of randomized controlled trials comparing post-operative extended versus conventional low-molecular-weight heparin on venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism rates.
RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials met the predefined criteria. Extended prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin after major abdominal and pelvic surgery decreased rates of postoperative venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, and proximal deep vein thrombosis without increased postoperative bleeding. Numbers needed to treat to prevent venous thromboembolism, overall deep vein thrombosis, and proximal deep vein thrombosis were 14, 14, and 44, respectively. Rates of postoperative symptomatic PE were rare, and the incidence was similar in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Extended prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with a decrease in asymptomatic venous thromboembolism. There remains sparse evidence regarding its impact on pulmonary embolism because of the overall low incidence. Extended prophylaxis should be considered in high-risk patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30190110     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of Anti-Factor Xa Levels of Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery Given Once-Daily Enoxaparin Prophylaxis: A Clinical Study Examining Enoxaparin Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Corinne B Bertolaccini; Ann Marie Prazak; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Risk of Pulmonary Embolism More Than 6 Weeks After Surgery Among Cancer-Free Middle-aged Patients.

Authors:  Alexandre Caron; Nicolas Depas; Emmanuel Chazard; Cécile Yelnik; Emmanuelle Jeanpierre; Camille Paris; Jean-Baptiste Beuscart; Grégoire Ficheur
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery at Primary and Secondary Hospitals in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC's): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendation.

Authors:  Ravi Oodit; Bruce M Biccard; Eugenio Panieri; Adrian O Alvarez; Marianna R S Sioson; Salome Maswime; Viju Thomas; Hyla-Louise Kluyts; Carol J Peden; Hans D de Boer; Mary Brindle; Nader K Francis; Gregg Nelson; Ulf O Gustafsson; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Evaluation of an Extended-duration Chemoprophylaxis Regimen for Venous Thromboembolism after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Eric M Pittelkow; Will C DeBrock; Brian Mailey; Tarah J Ballinger; Juan Socas; Mary E Lester; Aladdin H Hassanein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-08-06

5.  Efficiency and safety evaluation of prophylaxes for venous thrombosis after gynecological surgery.

Authors:  Ruidi Yu; Faridah Nansubuga; Jun Yang; Wencheng Ding; Kezhen Li; Danhui Weng; Peng Wu; Gang Chen; Ding Ma; Juncheng Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.