| Literature DB >> 30189678 |
Zhongde Dai1, Vilde Løining2, Jing Deng3, Luca Ansaloni4, Liyuan Deng5.
Abstract
Poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) (Entities:
Keywords: CO2 separation; PTMSP; ZIF; high free volume polymers; hybrid membranes
Year: 2018 PMID: 30189678 PMCID: PMC6160974 DOI: 10.3390/membranes8030076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Chemical structure of poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) (PTMSP).
Figure 2Structure and preparation route of ZIF-7, ZIF-8 and ZIF-L [26].
Figure 3Mixed-gas permeation setup (1: MFC-safety trap; 2: Humidifier; 3: Droplets trap; 4: Membrane module; 5: Heated cabinet; 6: Water knockout; 7: Bubble flow meters; MFC: Mass flow controller; NV: Needle valve; BPR: Back-pressure regulator; PI: Pressure indicator; HT: Humidity and temperature sensor; MWV: Multi-way valve; GC: Gas chromatograph).
Figure 4SEM image of the ZIF series used in the present study, (A) ZIF-L, (B)ZIF-8, and (C) ZIF-7.
Figure 5TGA results of neat PTMSP polymer and different nanoparticles (A), TGA curves of PTMSP/TiO2 (B), PTMSP/ZIF-7 (C), PTMSP/ZIF-L (D), and PTMSP/ZIF-8 (E).
Figure 6SEM images of membranes. (A) PTMSP, (B) PTMSP/30 wt % ZIF-7, (C) PTMSP/20 wt % ZIF-8, (D) PTMSP/20 wt % ZIF-L, and (E) PTMSP/20 wt % TiO2.
Figure 7FT-IR spectrum of PTMSP/nanofiller hybrid membranes. (A) PTMSP/TiO2, (B) PTMSP/ZIF-L, (C) PTMSP/ZIF-7 and (D) PTMSP/ZIF-8.
Detailed peak assignment of PTMSP and various additives.
| Peak Position (cm−1) | Peak Assignment | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTMSP | 1540 | stretching of the double C=C bond | [ |
| 1240 | deformation of the SiC–H bond | ||
| 820 | stretching of the C–Si bond | ||
| ZIF7 | 1455 | C–C stretching | [ |
| 777 | C–H stretching | ||
| ZIF8/ZIFL | 1584 | stretching of C–N bond found in the 2-methylimidazole ring | [ |
| 1350–1500 | ring stretching | ||
| 900–1350 | coupled with in-plane ring bending | ||
| 800 | out-of-plane bending | ||
| 1146 | C–H vibrations | ||
| 1310 | C–H vibrations | ||
| TiO2 | 768 | symmetric stretching vibrations in the Ti–O bond | [ |
Figure 8Gas separation performances of PTMSP membrane prepared from two different solvents, (A) CO2 permeability and (B) CO2/N2 selectivity.
Figure 9Gas separation performance of PTMSP/ZIF-8 hybrid membranes. (A) CO2 permeability and (B) CO2/N2 selectivity.
Figure 10Gas separation performances of PTMSP/ZIF-L hybrid membranes as a function of the ZIF-L loading.
Figure 11Possible gas transport mechanism in PTMSP/ZIF-L membranes.
Figure 12Gas separation performances of PTMSP/ZIF-L hybrid membranes as a function of relative humidity in the gaseous stream. (A) CO2 permeability and (B) CO2/N2 selectivity.
Figure 13Gas separation performances of PTMSP/ZIF-7 hybrid membranes. (A) CO2 permeability and (B) CO2/N2 selectivity.
Figure 14Gas separation performance of PTMSP/TiO2 hybrid membranes (Cyclohexane used as solvent). (A) CO2 permeability and (B) CO2/N2 selectivity.
Summary of PTMSP hybrid membrane separation performances.
| Solvent | Nanofiller | Nanofiller Content (wt %) | RH (%) | CO2 Permeability | CO2/N2 Selectivity (-) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHCl3 | - | - | 0.2 | 33,169.3 | 2.7 |
| CHCl3 | - | - | 94.1 | 30,152.0 | 2.9 |
| CHCl3 | ZIF-7 | 30 | 1.3 | 32,065.0 | 5.2 |
| CHCl3 | ZIF-7 | 30 | 93.4 | 28,205.3 | 5.5 |
| Cyclohexane | - | - | 0.9 | 20,338.7 | 6.9 |
| Cyclohexane | - | - | 93.2 | 19,074.8 | 7.6 |
| Cyclohexane | TiO2 | 5 | 0.5 | 28,432.2 | 6.0 |
| Cyclohexane | TiO2 | 5 | 91.7 | 19,465.6 | 6.7 |
| Cyclohexane | TiO2 | 25 | 0.7 | 27,222.0 | 5.6 |
| Cyclohexane | TiO2 | 25 | 93.6 | 16,550.1 | 6.6 |
| Cyclohexane | ZIF-8 | 20 | 0.7 | 27,781.7 | 4.6 |
| Cyclohexane | ZIF-8 | 20 | 89.9 | 14,764.1 | 5.0 |
| Cyclohexane | ZIF-L | 5 | 1.1 | 25,191.4 | 6.6 |
| Cyclohexane | ZIF-L | 5 | 92.0 | 20,949.6 | 7.0 |
| Cyclohexane | ZIF-L | 10 | 0.5 | 24,046.1 | 6.8 |
| Cyclohexane | ZIF-L | 10 | 92.5 | 19,175.1 | 7.2 |
| Cyclohexane | ZIF-L | 20 | 1.1 | 1,489.2 | 13.5 |
| Cyclohexane | ZIF-L | 20 | 92.3 | 1,255.1 | 14.9 |