Kristen E Allen1, Christina Chommanard2, Amber K Haynes1, Dean D Erdman3, Susan I Gerber3, Lindsay Kim4. 1. IHRC, Inc., Contracting Agent to the Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. 2. P3S Corporation, Contracting Agent to the Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. 3. Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. 4. Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; US Public Health Service, Rockville, MD, United States. Electronic address: iyn2@cdc.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Laboratory tests to detect respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vary in sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic testing practices can impact RSV disease diagnosis and burden estimates. OBJECTIVES: We surveyed a sample of laboratories that participated in the National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) in 2015-2016 to understand RSV testing, diagnostic capabilities, and practices. STUDY DESIGN: We distributed surveys in fall 2016 to NREVSS laboratories using an internet survey platform. We conducted a descriptive analysis of survey responses and stratified results by self-identified children's hospital laboratories (CHL, i.e. laboratories affiliated with or in a children's hospital) or general hospital laboratories (GHL, i.e. laboratories that performed analysis on specimens from only adults or adults and children). RESULTS: We sampled 367 (82.5%) of 445 eligible NREVSS laboratories with a 35.7% response rate; 11.5% (n = 15) were CHLs. All CHLs had PCR-based assay capability to test for RSV compared to 48.7% of GHLs (p < 0.001), and it was the most frequent method used by CHLs (n = 9, 75.0%). GHLs used rapid antigen detection tests most frequently (n = 65, 60.2%) to detect RSV compared to CHLs (p = 0.02, n = 3, 25.0%). Almost half (n = 41, 48.2%) of GHLs reported specimen submission from adults ≥50 years for RADTs. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory testing and diagnostic capabilities differed by whether laboratories self-identified as a CHL or GHL. Many GHLs reported use of RADTs in adults ≥50 years, a less sensitive diagnostic method for this population compared to PCR-based assays. RADT use in adults might miss RSV cases and affect diagnoses and disease burden estimates. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: Laboratory tests to detect respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vary in sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic testing practices can impact RSV disease diagnosis and burden estimates. OBJECTIVES: We surveyed a sample of laboratories that participated in the National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) in 2015-2016 to understand RSV testing, diagnostic capabilities, and practices. STUDY DESIGN: We distributed surveys in fall 2016 to NREVSS laboratories using an internet survey platform. We conducted a descriptive analysis of survey responses and stratified results by self-identified children's hospital laboratories (CHL, i.e. laboratories affiliated with or in a children's hospital) or general hospital laboratories (GHL, i.e. laboratories that performed analysis on specimens from only adults or adults and children). RESULTS: We sampled 367 (82.5%) of 445 eligible NREVSS laboratories with a 35.7% response rate; 11.5% (n = 15) were CHLs. All CHLs had PCR-based assay capability to test for RSV compared to 48.7% of GHLs (p < 0.001), and it was the most frequent method used by CHLs (n = 9, 75.0%). GHLs used rapid antigen detection tests most frequently (n = 65, 60.2%) to detect RSV compared to CHLs (p = 0.02, n = 3, 25.0%). Almost half (n = 41, 48.2%) of GHLs reported specimen submission from adults ≥50 years for RADTs. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory testing and diagnostic capabilities differed by whether laboratories self-identified as a CHL or GHL. Many GHLs reported use of RADTs in adults ≥50 years, a less sensitive diagnostic method for this population compared to PCR-based assays. RADT use in adults might miss RSV cases and affect diagnoses and disease burden estimates. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnostic testing; Laboratory surveillance; National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS); Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
Authors: Nicholas P DeGroote; Amber K Haynes; Calli Taylor; Marie E Killerby; Rebecca M Dahl; Desiree Mustaquim; Susan I Gerber; John T Watson Journal: J Clin Virol Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 3.168