Literature DB >> 30189255

Mixed effect machine learning: A framework for predicting longitudinal change in hemoglobin A1c.

Che Ngufor1, Holly Van Houten2, Brian S Caffo3, Nilay D Shah2, Rozalina G McCoy2.   

Abstract

Accurate and reliable prediction of clinical progression over time has the potential to improve the outcomes of chronic disease. The classical approach to analyzing longitudinal data is to use (generalized) linear mixed-effect models (GLMM). However, linear parametric models are predicated on assumptions, which are often difficult to verify. In contrast, data-driven machine learning methods can be applied to derive insight from the raw data without a priori assumptions. However, the underlying theory of most machine learning algorithms assume that the data is independent and identically distributed, making them inefficient for longitudinal supervised learning. In this study, we formulate an analytic framework, which integrates the random-effects structure of GLMM into non-linear machine learning models capable of exploiting temporal heterogeneous effects, sparse and varying-length patient characteristics inherent in longitudinal data. We applied the derived mixed-effect machine learning (MEml) framework to predict longitudinal change in glycemic control measured by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among well controlled adults with type 2 diabetes. Results show that MEml is competitive with traditional GLMM, but substantially outperformed standard machine learning models that do not account for random-effects. Specifically, the accuracy of MEml in predicting glycemic change at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th clinical visits in advanced was 1.04, 1.08, 1.11, and 1.14 times that of the gradient boosted model respectively, with similar results for the other methods. To further demonstrate the general applicability of MEml, a series of experiments were performed using real publicly available and synthetic data sets for accuracy and robustness. These experiments reinforced the superiority of MEml over the other methods. Overall, results from this study highlight the importance of modeling random-effects in machine learning approaches based on longitudinal data. Our MEml method is highly resistant to correlated data, readily accounts for random-effects, and predicts change of a longitudinal clinical outcome in real-world clinical settings with high accuracy.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glycemic control; Glycosylated hemoglobin; Longitudinal supervised learning; Machine learning; Random-effects; Type 2 diabetes

Year:  2018        PMID: 30189255      PMCID: PMC6495570          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  13 in total

1.  MissForest--non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data.

Authors:  Daniel J Stekhoven; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM--2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.

Authors:  Alan J Garber; Martin J Abrahamson; Joshua I Barzilay; Lawrence Blonde; Zachary T Bloomgarden; Michael A Bush; Samuel Dagogo-Jack; Ralph A DeFronzo; Daniel Einhorn; Vivian A Fonseca; Jeffrey R Garber; W Timothy Garvey; George Grunberger; Yehuda Handelsman; Robert R Henry; Irl B Hirsch; Paul S Jellinger; Janet B McGill; Jeffrey I Mechanick; Paul D Rosenblit; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Longitudinal study of the profile and predictors of left ventricular mass regression after stentless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Eric Lim; Ayyaz Ali; Panagiotis Theodorou; Ines Sousa; Hutan Ashrafian; Themis Chamageorgakis; Alison Duncan; Michael Henein; Peter Diggle; John Pepper
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors:  R C Turner; C A Cull; V Frighi; R R Holman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Noah M Ivers; Jeremy M Grimshaw; David Moher; Lucy Turner; James Galipeau; Ilana Halperin; Brigitte Vachon; Tim Ramsay; Braden Manns; Marcello Tonelli; Kaveh Shojania
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Application of the Mayo primary biliary cirrhosis survival model to Mayo liver transplant patients.

Authors:  P M Grambsch; E R Dickson; R H Wiesner; A Langworthy
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Joint modelling of repeated measurement and time-to-event data: an introductory tutorial.

Authors:  Özgür Asar; James Ritchie; Philip A Kalra; Peter J Diggle
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Glycemic control over 5 years in 4,900 people with type 2 diabetes: real-world diabetes therapy in a clinical trial cohort.

Authors:  James D Best; Paul L Drury; Timothy M E Davis; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Y Antero Kesäniemi; Russell Scott; Christopher Pardy; Merryn Voysey; Anthony C Keech
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  HbA1c overtesting and overtreatment among US adults with controlled type 2 diabetes, 2001-13: observational population based study.

Authors:  Rozalina G McCoy; Holly K Van Houten; Joseph S Ross; Victor M Montori; Nilay D Shah
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-12-08
View more
  11 in total

1.  The Feasibility and Utility of Harnessing Digital Health to Understand Clinical Trajectories in Medication Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: D-TECT Study Design and Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Lisa A Marsch; Ching-Hua Chen; Sara R Adams; Asma Asyyed; Monique B Does; Saeed Hassanpour; Emily Hichborn; Melanie Jackson-Morris; Nicholas C Jacobson; Heather K Jones; David Kotz; Chantal A Lambert-Harris; Zhiguo Li; Bethany McLeman; Varun Mishra; Catherine Stanger; Geetha Subramaniam; Weiyi Wu; Cynthia I Campbell
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  Predicting complications of diabetes mellitus using advanced machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Branimir Ljubic; Ameen Abdel Hai; Marija Stanojevic; Wilson Diaz; Daniel Polimac; Martin Pavlovski; Zoran Obradovic
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  A random forest method with feature selection for developing medical prediction models with clustered and longitudinal data.

Authors:  Jaime Lynn Speiser
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Functional data analysis and prediction tools for continuous glucose-monitoring studies.

Authors:  Emrah Gecili; Rui Huang; Jane C Khoury; Eileen King; Mekibib Altaye; Katherine Bowers; Rhonda D Szczesniak
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2020-09-22

5.  A Machine Learning-Based Aging Measure Among Middle-Aged and Older Chinese Adults: The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Xingqi Cao; Guanglai Yang; Xurui Jin; Liu He; Xueqin Li; Zhoutao Zheng; Zuyun Liu; Chenkai Wu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-01

6.  Exploration of Machine Learning and Statistical Techniques in Development of a Low-Cost Screening Method Featuring the Global Diet Quality Score for Detecting Prediabetes in Rural India.

Authors:  Nick Birk; Mika Matsuzaki; Teresa T Fung; Yanping Li; Carolina Batis; Meir J Stampfer; Megan Deitchler; Walter C Willett; Wafaie W Fawzi; Sabri Bromage; Sanjay Kinra; Shilpa N Bhupathiraju; Erin Lake
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.687

7.  Using imputation to provide harmonized longitudinal measures of cognition across AIBL and ADNI.

Authors:  Rosita Shishegar; Timothy Cox; David Rolls; Pierrick Bourgeat; Vincent Doré; Fiona Lamb; Joanne Robertson; Simon M Laws; Tenielle Porter; Jurgen Fripp; Duygu Tosun; Paul Maruff; Greg Savage; Christopher C Rowe; Colin L Masters; Michael W Weiner; Victor L Villemagne; Samantha C Burnham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Research on early warning of renal damage in hypertensive patients based on the stacking strategy.

Authors:  Qiubo Bi; Zemin Kuang; E Haihong; Meina Song; Ling Tan; Xinying Tang; Xing Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.298

9.  Impact of labor characteristics on maternal and neonatal outcomes of labor: A machine-learning model.

Authors:  Sherif A Shazly; Bijan J Borah; Che G Ngufor; Vanessa E Torbenson; Regan N Theiler; Abimbola O Famuyide
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Development and Validation of a Risk Stratification Model Using Disease Severity Hierarchy for Mortality or Major Cardiovascular Event.

Authors:  Che Ngufor; Pedro J Caraballo; Thomas J O'Byrne; David Chen; Nilay D Shah; Lisiane Pruinelli; Michael Steinbach; Gyorgy Simon
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.