| Literature DB >> 30189080 |
Jud Janak1, Zsolt Stockinger1, Edward Mazuchowski1, Russ Kotwal1, Jonathan Sosnov1, Harold Montgomery1, Frank Butler1, Stacy Shackelford1, Jennifer Gurney1, Mary Spott1, Louis Finelli1, David J Smith1.
Abstract
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Report on Zero Preventable Deaths highlighted the need for a military and civilian partnership to take lessons learned from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and incorporate them into a national learning trauma care system. One of the specific objectives in the report was to establish military preventable death metrics. Upon further inspection, it became apparent that the Department of Defense did not have an established methodology to reliably estimate and report preventable death metrics and opportunities to improve the military trauma care system. Over the last year, clinical and non-clinical subject matter experts from the Joint Trauma System and Armed Forces Medical Examiners System began the process of establishing a standard military preventable death review process to meet the objective outlined in the report. Based on an assessment to understand methodological best practices for preventable death reviews, this manuscript presents the conceptual framework that is guiding our effort to establish the first ever battle-related mortality surveillance system with preventable death metrics and opportunities to improve the trauma care system.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30189080 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usy149
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mil Med ISSN: 0026-4075 Impact factor: 1.437