Edward J Rohn1, Denise G Tate1, Martin Forchheimer1, Lisa DiPonio1,2. 1. a Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA. 2. b Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to gain greater insight into individuals' quality of life (QOL) definitions, appraisals, and adaptations following spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: A mixed-methods design, applying the Schwartz and Sprangers response shift (RS) model. RS is a cognitive process wherein, in response to a change in health status, individuals change internal standards, values, or conceptualization of QOL Setting: Community-dwelling participants who receive medical treatment at a major Midwestern medical system and nearby Veterans' Affairs hospital. Participants: A purposive sample of participants with SCI (N = 40) completed semi-structured interviews and accompanying quantitative measures. Interventions: Not applicable. Outcome Measures: Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis to identify themes. Analysis of variance were performed to detect differences based on themes and QOL, well-being, and demographic and injury characteristics. Results: Four RS themes were identified, capturing the range of participant perceptions of QOL. The themes ranged from complete RS, indicating active engagement in maintaining QOL, to awareness and comparisons redefining QOL, to a relative lack of RS. Average QOL ratings differed as a function of response shift themes. PROMIS Global Health, Anxiety, and Depression also differed as a function of RS themes. Conclusion: The RS model contextualizes differences in QOL definitions, appraisals, and adaptations in a way standardized QOL measures alone do not.
Objective: The objective of this study was to gain greater insight into individuals' quality of life (QOL) definitions, appraisals, and adaptations following spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: A mixed-methods design, applying the Schwartz and Sprangers response shift (RS) model. RS is a cognitive process wherein, in response to a change in health status, individuals change internal standards, values, or conceptualization of QOL Setting: Community-dwelling participants who receive medical treatment at a major Midwestern medical system and nearby Veterans' Affairs hospital. Participants: A purposive sample of participants with SCI (N = 40) completed semi-structured interviews and accompanying quantitative measures. Interventions: Not applicable. Outcome Measures: Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis to identify themes. Analysis of variance were performed to detect differences based on themes and QOL, well-being, and demographic and injury characteristics. Results: Four RS themes were identified, capturing the range of participant perceptions of QOL. The themes ranged from complete RS, indicating active engagement in maintaining QOL, to awareness and comparisons redefining QOL, to a relative lack of RS. Average QOL ratings differed as a function of response shift themes. PROMIS Global Health, Anxiety, and Depression also differed as a function of RS themes. Conclusion: The RS model contextualizes differences in QOL definitions, appraisals, and adaptations in a way standardized QOL measures alone do not.
Entities:
Keywords:
Mixed methods research; Neurogenic bladder and bowel; Patient experiences; Qualitative research; Quality of life; Response shift; Spinal cord injury
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Denise G Tate; Martin Forchheimer; Gianna Rodriguez; Anthony Chiodo; Anne Pelletier Cameron; Michelle Meade; Andrei Krassioukov Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jeanne Jackson; Mike Carlson; Salah Rubayi; Michael D Scott; Michal S Atkins; Erna I Blanche; Clarissa Saunders-Newton; Stephanie Mielke; Mary Kay Wolfe; Florence A Clark Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2010 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Denise G Tate; Martin B Forchheimer; Dunia Karana-Zebari; Anthony E Chiodo; Jennifer Young Kendall Thomas Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 3.033