Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics With Horizontal Cleavage Tears and Treatment of the Lateral Meniscus in the Human Knee: An In Vitro Cadaver Study.

BACKGROUND: Partial meniscectomy is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures for a meniscus tear. Decreased contact area and increased contact pressure have been seen in partial meniscectomies from treatment of various types of meniscal tears; however, the biomechanical effect of a horizontal cleavage tear in the lateral meniscus and subsequent treatment are unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This study asked whether a horizontal cleavage tear of the lateral meniscus, resecting the inferior leaf, and further resecting the superior leaf would (1) decrease contact area and (2) increase peak contact pressure.
METHODS: Eleven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were evaluated under five conditions of intact meniscus, horizontal cleavage tear, inferior leaf resection, and resection of the inferior and superior leaves of the lateral meniscus. Tibiofemoral contact area and pressure were measured at 0° and 60° knee flexion under an 800-N load, normalized to that at the intact condition of the corresponding knee flexion, and compared across the five previously described conditions.
RESULTS: At 0° knee flexion, normalized contact area with inferior leaf resection (65.4% ± 14.1%) was smaller than that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%, p < 0.001); smaller than horizontal cleavage tear (94.1% ± 5.8%, p = 0.001) contact area; and smaller than repaired horizontal tear (92.8% ± 8.2%, p = 0.001) contact area. Normalized contact area with further superior leaf resection (50.5% ± 7.3%) was smaller than that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%, p < 0.001); smaller than horizontal cleavage tear (94.1% ± 5.8%, p < 0.001) contact area; and smaller than repaired horizontal tear (92.8% ± 8.2%, p < 0.001) contact area. At 60° flexion, normalized contact area with inferior leaf resection (76.1% ± 14.8%) was smaller than that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%, p = 0.004); smaller than horizontal cleavage tear (101.8% ± 7.2%, p = 0.006) contact area; and smaller than repaired horizontal tear (104.0% ± 13.3%, p < 0.001) contact area. Normalized contact area with further superior leaf resection (52.1% ± 16.7%) was smaller than that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%, p < 0.001); smaller than horizontal cleavage tear (101.8% ± 7.2%, p < 0.001) contact area; and smaller than repaired horizontal tear (104.0% ± 13.3%, p < 0.001) contact area. At 60° flexion, contact area with both leaf resection (52.1% ± 16.7%) was smaller than that with inferior leaf resection (76.1% ± 14.8%, p = 0.039). At 0° knee flexion, peak pressure increased to 127.0% ± 22.1% with inferior leaf resection (p = 0.026) and to 138.6% ± 24.3% with further superior leaf resection (p = 0.002) compared with that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%). At 60° flexion, compared with that at the intact condition (100% ± 0.0%), peak pressure increased to 139% ± 33.6% with inferior leaf resection (p = 0.035) and to 155.5% ± 34.7% (p = 0.004) with further superior leaf resection.
CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the inferior leaf or both leaves of the lateral meniscus after a horizontal cleavage tear resulted in decreased contact area and increased peak contact pressure at 0° and 60° knee flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In vitro resection of one or both leaves of a horizontal cleavage tear of the lateral meniscus causes increases in peak pressure, consistent with other types of partial meniscectomies associated in a clinical setting with excessive loading and damage to knee cartilage. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing partial leaf meniscectomy could confirm this theory. Avoidance of resection may be relatively beneficial for long-term function. The findings of this in vitro study lend biomechanical support for nonoperative management.