Monitoring Local Electric Fields at Electrode Surfaces Using Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering-Based Stark-Shift Spectroscopy during Hydrogen Evolution Reactions.

We report the use of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) to measure the vibrational Stark shifts of surface-bound thiolated-benzonitrile molecules bound to an electrode surface during hydrogen evolution reactions (HERs). Here, the electrode surface consists of Au nanoislands deposited both with and without an underlying layer of monolayer graphene on a glass substrate. The Stark shifts observed in the nitrile (C-N) stretch frequency (around 2225 cm-1) are used to report the local electric field strength at the electrode surface under electrochemical working conditions. Under positive (i.e., oxidative) applied potentials [vs normal hydrogen electrode (NHE)], we observe blue shifts of up to 7.6 cm-1, which correspond to local electric fields of 22 mV/cm. Under negative applied potentials (vs NHE), the C-N stretch frequency is red-shifted by only about 1 cm-1. This corresponds to a regime in which the electrochemical current increases exponentially in the hydrogen evolution process. Under these finite electrochemical currents, we estimate the voltage drop across the solution ( V = IR). Correcting for this voltage drop results in a highly linear electric field versus applied electrochemical voltage relation. Here, the onset potential for the HER lies around 0.2 V versus NHE and the point of zero charge (PZC) occurs at 0.04 V versus NHE, based on the capacitance-voltage ( C- V) profile. The solution field is obtained by comparing the C-N stretch frequency in solution with that obtained in air. By evaluating the local electric field strength at the PZC and the onset potential, we can separate the solution field from the reaction field (i.e., electrode field), respectively. At the onset of HER, the solution field is -0.8 mV/cm and the electrode field is -1.2 mV/cm. At higher ion concentrations, we observe similar electric field strengths and more linear E-field versus applied potential behavior because of the relatively low resistance of the solution, which results in negligible voltage drops ( V = IR).