Shihchen Kuo1, Chun-Ting Yang2, Jin-Shang Wu3,4, Huang-Tz Ou2,5,6. 1. Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. 3. Department of Family Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan. 4. Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. 5. Department of Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. 6. Department of Pharmacy, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the effects of initiating insulin as a fourth-line antidiabetic therapy with the effects of enhancing oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with triple OAD therapy failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based, retrospective cohort study involving 1022 (without prevalent diabetes-related complications [PDRCs]) and 2077 (with/without PDRCs) propensity score-matched pairs of fourth-line insulin therapy users and enhanced OAD therapy users identified in the period 2004 to 2010. Clinical outcomes including a composite cardiovascular outcome (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or ischaemic heart disease), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), hypoglycaemia and all-cause mortality were assessed up to 2013. Hypoglycaemia was adjusted in Cox models to consider its potential effect on study outcomes. RESULTS: In a T2DM cohort without PDRCs, fourth-line insulin therapy was not associated with greater risks of clinical outcomes, except hypoglycaemia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.07), compared with enhanced OAD therapy. Among patients with T2DM with/without PDRCs, fourth-line insulin therapy was associated with greater risks of the composite cardiovascular outcome (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.46), heart failure (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12-2.25), ischaemic heart disease (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.73), PVD (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), hypoglycaemia (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.20-1.85) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.17), but adjustment for hypoglycaemia significantly attenuated the risk of heart failure (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.92-1.94), PVD (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.98-1.34) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.84-1.99). CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of fourth-line insulin therapy can be considered for patients with T2DM with triple OAD therapy failure, and the importance of awareness and prevention of hypoglycaemia among insulin-treated patients with T2DM cannot be overstated.
AIMS: To compare the effects of initiating insulin as a fourth-line antidiabetic therapy with the effects of enhancing oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with triple OAD therapy failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based, retrospective cohort study involving 1022 (without prevalent diabetes-related complications [PDRCs]) and 2077 (with/without PDRCs) propensity score-matched pairs of fourth-line insulin therapy users and enhanced OAD therapy users identified in the period 2004 to 2010. Clinical outcomes including a composite cardiovascular outcome (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or ischaemic heart disease), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), hypoglycaemia and all-cause mortality were assessed up to 2013. Hypoglycaemia was adjusted in Cox models to consider its potential effect on study outcomes. RESULTS: In a T2DM cohort without PDRCs, fourth-line insulin therapy was not associated with greater risks of clinical outcomes, except hypoglycaemia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.07), compared with enhanced OAD therapy. Among patients with T2DM with/without PDRCs, fourth-line insulin therapy was associated with greater risks of the composite cardiovascular outcome (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.46), heart failure (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12-2.25), ischaemic heart disease (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.09-1.73), PVD (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36), hypoglycaemia (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.20-1.85) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.17), but adjustment for hypoglycaemia significantly attenuated the risk of heart failure (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.92-1.94), PVD (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.98-1.34) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.84-1.99). CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of fourth-line insulin therapy can be considered for patients with T2DM with triple OAD therapy failure, and the importance of awareness and prevention of hypoglycaemia among insulin-treated patients with T2DM cannot be overstated.
Authors: Linda G Mellbin; Lars Rydén; Matthew C Riddle; Jeffrey Probstfield; Julio Rosenstock; Rafael Díaz; Salim Yusuf; Hertzel C Gerstein Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ching-Lan Cheng; Yea-Huei Yang Kao; Swu-Jane Lin; Cheng-Han Lee; Ming Liang Lai Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2010-12-29 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Bernard Zinman; Steven P Marso; Erik Christiansen; Salvatore Calanna; Søren Rasmussen; John B Buse Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Andrew J Karter; Usha Subramanian; Chandan Saha; Jesse C Crosson; Melissa M Parker; Bix E Swain; Howard H Moffet; David G Marrero Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Bernard R Chaitman; Regina M Hardison; Dale Adler; Suzanne Gebhart; Mary Grogan; Salvador Ocampo; George Sopko; Jose A Ramires; David Schneider; Robert L Frye Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: K Horvath; K Jeitler; A Berghold; S H Ebrahim; T W Gratzer; J Plank; T Kaiser; T R Pieber; A Siebenhofer Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2007-04-18