AIMS: In 2017, Kiemeneij published a paper on distal trans-radial artery access for coronary angiography in 62 patients. This paper proposed several advantages to this method. Since this paper was published, several other papers have been published describing this technique, with less than 200 cases in total described. We performed a non randomized control study of left distal trans-radial access in patients undergoing coronary angiography in our center. METHODS: We prospectively identified patients presenting for coronary angiography to our center for enrolment in this study. We recruited 94 patients (47 ldTRA, 47 age and sex matched controls). Pre-defined endpoints for the study were as follows: time until radial compression device (RCD) removal, procedural time, radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, and contrast dose. RESULTS: Patient and procedural characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. With regard to our primary endpoint, patients undergoing ldTRA required, on average, 69 min less time until removal of the RCD (167.8 ± 30 vs 236.6 ± 63.9 min, P < 0.0001). Procedural length did not vary between groups (28.95 ± 5.89 vs 29.76 ± 8.16 min, P = 0.5824). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in radiation dose area product (5032.66 ± 2740 vs 4826 ± 2796 Gy/cm2 , P = 0.7191), contrast dose (82.93 ± 23 vs 92.1 ± 33 mL, P = 0.1215), and fluoroscopy time between the two groups (5.41 ± 3.42 vs 4.82 ± 2.97 min, P = 0.3742). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that ldTRA is a feasible technique for diagnostic coronary angiography in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory. It results in decreased post-procedure radial artery compression time without increasing procedural time or radiation dose.
AIMS: In 2017, Kiemeneij published a paper on distal trans-radial artery access for coronary angiography in 62 patients. This paper proposed several advantages to this method. Since this paper was published, several other papers have been published describing this technique, with less than 200 cases in total described. We performed a non randomized control study of left distal trans-radial access in patients undergoing coronary angiography in our center. METHODS: We prospectively identified patients presenting for coronary angiography to our center for enrolment in this study. We recruited 94 patients (47 ldTRA, 47 age and sex matched controls). Pre-defined endpoints for the study were as follows: time until radial compression device (RCD) removal, procedural time, radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, and contrast dose. RESULTS:Patient and procedural characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups. With regard to our primary endpoint, patients undergoing ldTRA required, on average, 69 min less time until removal of the RCD (167.8 ± 30 vs 236.6 ± 63.9 min, P < 0.0001). Procedural length did not vary between groups (28.95 ± 5.89 vs 29.76 ± 8.16 min, P = 0.5824). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in radiation dose area product (5032.66 ± 2740 vs 4826 ± 2796 Gy/cm2 , P = 0.7191), contrast dose (82.93 ± 23 vs 92.1 ± 33 mL, P = 0.1215), and fluoroscopy time between the two groups (5.41 ± 3.42 vs 4.82 ± 2.97 min, P = 0.3742). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that ldTRA is a feasible technique for diagnostic coronary angiography in a modern cardiac catheterization laboratory. It results in decreased post-procedure radial artery compression time without increasing procedural time or radiation dose.