| Literature DB >> 30186844 |
Juan D Latorre1, Bishnu Adhikari1, Si H Park2, Kyle D Teague1, Lucas E Graham1, Brittany D Mahaffey1, Mikayla F A Baxter1, Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco3, Young M Kwon1, Steven C Ricke4, Lisa R Bielke5, Billy M Hargis1, Guillermo Tellez1.
Abstract
Necrotic enteritis (NE) is a recognized multifactorial disease that cost annually to the poultry industry around $2 billion. However, diverse aspects related to its presentation are not completely understood, requiring further studies using known induction experimental models. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to measure the changes occurring in performance, intestinal integrity and ileal microbiome using a previously established NE-challenge model. Chickens were assigned to a negative control group (NC) or a positive control group (PC). In the PC, broilers were orally gavaged with Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) (1 × 107 cfu/chick) at day 1, Eimeria maxima (EM) (2.5 × 104 oocyst/chick) at day 18 and Clostridium perfringens (CP) (1 × 108 cfu/chick/day) at 23-24 days of age. Weekly, body weight (BW), body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were evaluated. Morbidity and mortality were determined throughout the study, and NE lesion scores were recorded at day 25. Additionally, blood and liver samples were collected to measure gut permeability as determined by levels of serum fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (FITC-d) and bacterial translocation (BT). Ileal contents were processed for 16S rRNA gene-based microbiome analysis. Performance parameters and intestinal permeability measurements were negatively impacted in the PC resulting in elevated serum FITC-d and BT with a -6.4% difference in BWG. The NE lesion score in PC (1.97 vs. 0.00) was significantly higher in comparison to NC, although there was no difference in mortality. The microbiome analysis showed a dramatic shift of ileal microbiomes in PC groups as compared to NC (ANOSIM: R = 0.76, P = 0.001). The shift was characterized by reduced abundance of the phylum Actinobacteria (P < 0.01), and increased abundance of the genera Butyrivibrio, Lactobacillus, Prevotella and Ruminococcus in PC compared to NC (P < 0.05). Expectedly, Clostridium was found higher in PC (2.98 ± 0.71%) as compared to NC (1.84 ± 0.36%), yet the difference was not significant. In conclusion, results of the present study showed the different intestinal epithelial and microbiological alterations occurring in an established NE-challenge model that considers paratyphoid Salmonella infections in young chicks as an important predisposing factor for presentation of NE.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridium perfringens; broiler chickens; intestinal permeability; microbiome; necrotic enteritis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30186844 PMCID: PMC6110846 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Evaluation of body weight (BW), body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) in broiler chickens in a Necrotic enteritis challenge model.
| day 0 | 42.4 ± 0.40 | 43.1 ± 0.83 |
| day 7 | 148.3 ± 2.30 | 130.1 ± 0.40 |
| day 14 | 390.5 ± 6.20 | 357.5 ± 0.75 |
| day 25 | 1149.0 ± 11.75 | 854.2 ± 19.60 |
| days 0–7 | 106.0 ± 3.00 | 87.0 ± 0.40 |
| days 7–14 | 242.3 ± 3.85 | 227.4 ± 1.15 |
| days 14–25 | 758.5 ± 5.55 | 496.8 ± 20.35 |
| days 0–25 | 1106.7 ± 12.15 | 811.1 ± 18.75 |
| Days 0–7 | 141.6 ± 1.64 | 123.4 ± 1.68 |
| Days 7–14 | 364.6 ± 2.61 | 344.5 ± 37.50 |
| Days 14–25 | 1248.2 ± 2.04 | 1114.0 ± 52.96 |
| Days 0–25 | 1754.3 ± 6.30 | 1576.4 ± 86.66 |
| Days 0–7 | 1.337 ± 0.019 | 1.419 ± 0.026 |
| Days 7–14 | 1.510 ± 0.014 | 1.517 ± 0.173 |
| Days 14–25 | 1.650 ± 0.010 | 2.240 ± 0.015 |
| Days 0–25 | 1.586 ± 0.012 | 1.949 ± 0.069 |
Means in each row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Data are expressed as mean ± SE; n = 40/group.
Figure 1Change in body weight gain (BWG; g/broiler) after challenge with (A) Eimeria maxima and (B) Clostridium perfringens in a Necrotic enteritis model.
Evaluation of gut permeability and ileal lesion scores in a necrotic enteritis challenge model.
| Aerobic bacterial translocation | 2.25 ± 0.38 | 3.76 ± 0.49 |
| Anaerobic bacterial translocation | 0.61 ± 0.49 | 2.28 ± 0.42 |
| FITC-d | 15.05 ± 6.90 | 203.23 ± 27.86 |
| Lesion Score | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 1.97 ± 0.12 |
Means in each row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Total recovered bacteria translocated to the liver; data are expressed as mean ± SE; n = 12/group.
Fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran (FITC-d); data are expressed as mean ± SE; n = 20/group.
Ileal lesion score data are expressed as mean ± SE; n = 40/group.
Morbidity and mortality progression of broiler chickens in Necrotic enteritis model.
| Morbidity (day 22) | 0 | 0 |
| Morbidity (day 23) | 0 | 12.5 |
| Morbidity (day 24) | 0 | 100 |
| Mortality (day 25) | 0 | 0 |
Means in each row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05); Morbidity and mortality are expressed as total percentage; n = 40/group.
Means in each row with different superscripts are significantly different (P < 0.01); Morbidity and mortality are expressed as total percentage; n = 40/group.
Figure 2Relative abundance (%) of bacteria at (A) Phylum, (B) Family, and (C) Genus levels in the ileum of negative and positive control (with induced necrotic enteritis) groups. Minor bacteria genera including unassigned values were included as “others”.
Relative abundance of phylum, family, and genera differentially present in the ileal microbiomes between negative control vs. positive control with induced necrotic enteritis.
| Actinobacteria | 5.18 ± 0.57 | 2.91 ± 0.39 | 0.0055 |
| Brevibacteriaceae | 0.87 ± 0.12 | 0.23 ± 0.09 | 0.0008 |
| Christensenellaceae | 0.02 ± 0.20 | 0.20 ± 0.06 | 0.0258 |
| Clostridiaceae | 10.86 ± 0.86 | 4.01 ± 0.80 | 0.0002 |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 6.98 ± 0.76 | 12.98 ± 1.30 | 0.0018 |
| Erysipelotrichaceae | 0.58 ± 0.21 | 2.08 ± 0.30 | 0.0013 |
| Flavobacteriaceae | 0.42 ± 0.10 | 0.08 ± 0.05 | 0.0118 |
| Hyphomicrobiaceae | 0.75 ± 0.13 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.0002 |
| Lactobacillaceae | 5.37 ± 1.23 | 15.95 ± 2.34 | 0.0009 |
| Leuconostocaceae | 0.11 ± 0.06 | 0.83 ± 0.12 | 0.0002 |
| Microbacteriaceae | 0.34 ± 0.13 | 0.05 ± 0.05 | 0.0339 |
| Moraxellaceae | 2.15 ± 0.35 | 1.08 ± 0.15 | 0.0370 |
| Peptostreptococcaceae | 5.69 ± 0.93 | 0.75 ± 0.14 | <0.0001 |
| Phyllobacteriaceae | 0.28 ± 0.13 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.0164 |
| Prevotellaceae | 0.52 ± 0.13 | 1.02 ± 0.58 | 0.0344 |
| Ruminococcaceae | 3.83 ± 0.65 | 8.12 ± 1.21 | 0.0042 |
| Sphingobacteriaceae | 1.22 ± 0.22 | 0.76 ± 0.38 | 0.0183 |
| Staphylococcaceae | 0.97 ± 0.22 | 0.55 ± 0.28 | 0.0415 |
| Turicibacteraceae | 5.55 ± 0.71 | 1.11 ± 0.20 | <0.0001 |
| 0.87 ± 0.12 | 0.23 ± 0.09 | 0.0008 | |
| 0.08 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.08 | 0.0305 | |
| cc_115 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.11 | 0.0174 |
| 0.75 ± 0.13 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.0002 | |
| 0.50 ± 0.11 | 0.95 ± 0.16 | 0.0453 | |
| 0.54 ± 0.15 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.0039 | |
| 5.30 ± 1.21 | 15.85 ± 2.28 | <0.0001 | |
| 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.27 ± 0.06 | 0.0004 | |
| 0.63 ± 0.17 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | 0.0061 | |
| 0.44 ± 0.14 | 1.94 ± 0.63 | 0.0178 | |
| 0.52 ± 0.13 | 1.02 ± 0.16 | 0.0344 | |
| 0.15 ± 0.07 | 0.70 ± 0.14 | 0.0040 | |
| PSB-M-3 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | 0.48 ± 0.08 | 0.0005 |
| 2.10 ± 0.32 | 3.45 ± 0.31 | 0.0085 | |
| SMB53 | 0.90 ± 0.09 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | <0.0001 |
| 5.50 ± 0.71 | 1.16 ± 0.20 | 0.001 | |
Relative abundance data are expressed as mean ± SE; n = 12/group. Wilcoxon test was conducted to identify differentially abundant taxa where significant level was set at P < 0.05.
Figure 3PCoA plot showing beta diversity between Negative and Positive control (with induced necrotic enteritis) as measured by weighted UniFrac metric. ANOSIM results (R = 0.76, P = 0.001) showed significant difference in community structure between groups.