Literature DB >> 30186577

New Concepts on Reversibility and Targeting of Liver Fibrosis; A Review Article.

Hedyeh Ebrahimi1,2, Mohammadreza Naderian1,2, Amir Ali Sohrabpour3.   

Abstract

Currently, liver fibrosis and its complications are regarded as critical health problems. With the studies showing the reversible nature of liver fibrogenesis, scientists have focused on understanding the underlying mechanism of this condition in order to develop new therapeutic strategies. Although hepatic stellate cells are known as the primary cells responsible for liver fibrogenesis, studies have shown contributing roles for other cells, pathways, and molecules in the development of fibrosis depending on the etiology of liver fibrosis. Hence, interventions could be directed in the proper way for each type of liver diseases to better address this complication. There are two main approaches in clinical reversion of liver fibrosis; eliminating the underlying insult and targeting the fibrosis process, which have variable clinical importance in the treatment of this disease. In this review, we present recent concepts in molecular pathways of liver fibrosis reversibility and their clinical implications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fibrosis; Gene targeting; Genetic therapy; Liver cirrhosis; Therapeutics

Year:  2018        PMID: 30186577      PMCID: PMC6119836          DOI: 10.15171/mejdd.2018.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis        ISSN: 2008-5230


INTRODUCTION

Cirrhosis, which is the final stage of liver fibrosis, is one of the major health-related concerns worldwide. According to the global reports, cirrhosis results in about 1 million deaths annually.[1] Among chronic diseases, after coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accidents, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cirrhosis is the fourth leading cause of lost life years.[1] Liver fibrosis, the healing process as a response to a wide spectrum of chronic complications, including viral hepatitis, and alcoholic or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,[2] can encapsulate the injury in the first stages of the insult and is regarded as a protective and reversible response of the liver tissue to these subset of injuries.[3] However, if the damage remains for a longer period, liver fibrosis will lead to cirrhosis, which causes further life-threatening complications such as hepatocellular carcinoma.[4] Fibrosis formation is caused by imbalances in extracellular matrix (ECM) formation and its degeneration, which are regulated by extracellular enzymes; matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors; and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMPs), respectively. Although a wide range of cells contribute to hepatic fibrogenesis, activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), one of the non-parenchymal cells in the liver, is shown to play a pivotal role in this process.[5] HSCs are the major source of cells that transform to myofibroblasts (MFs). These cells are the highly proliferative lineage that could accumulate at injury sites and promote ECM deposition.[6,7] Due to hepatic injury, autocrine and paracrine secretion of fibrogenic cytokines promote HSCs to transform from a quiescent form into an activated myofibroblastic state, which has a migratory and highly proliferative characteristic. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and interleukin 1 (IL-1) are among the known cytokines involved in fibrogenesis pathways. Activated HSCs express fibrogenic proteins and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) while they lose their vitamin A storage.[2,8,9] Moreover, it is shown that extrahepatic cells, such as portal fibroblasts and bone marrow derived mesenchymal cells could also contribute to ECM synthesis as MF.[6,7] Furthermore, chronic hepatic insult induces hepatocyte apoptosis and these apoptotic bodies promote HSCs activation as well as secretion of fibrogenic cytokines from Kupffer cells (KCs). In response to liver injury, KCs evolve into their activated forms and express chemokine receptors, secrete inflammatory cytokines including C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2 (CCL2), and more importantly induce HSCs activation (Figure 1).[2,10]
Fig.1

Molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in liver fibrogenesis

Molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in liver fibrogenesis Liver fibrosis happens as a result of interactions between several molecular and cellular processes. Chronic hepatic injury promotes hepatocytes into apoptosis, and apoptotic hepatocyte bodies induce secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, TGF-β, PDGF, and IL-1) from KCs leading to HSCs activation and proliferation. Activated macrophages also release CCL2 that recruits LY6Chi monocytes and intensify inflammatory state. Moreover, activated HSCs express collagen fibers in addition to TIMP-1 that inhibits MMP activities and result in ECM accumulation. Tumor necrosis factor α, TNF-α; Transforming growth factor β, TGF-β; Platelet-derived growth factor, PDGF; Interleukin 1, IL-1; Kupffer cells, KCs; Hepatic stellate cells, HSCs; C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2, CCL2; Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 1, TIMP-1; Matrix metalloproteinases, MMP; Extracellular matrix, ECM

Reversibility of Liver Fibrosis

In most references, “regression” of liver fibrosis is referred to as resolution of fibrotic septa in the liver microstructure while “reversion” is considered as the more profound resolution to near normal pathology.[11] We use these terms accordingly in this review.

Molecular pathways of fibrosis reversibility

An array of cells and cytokines are involved in the evolution of liver fibrosis. Among them, HSCs and MFs regardless of their origin[12] have more central role.[13-15] MFs secrete high amounts of collagen I/III,[16] express high levels of TIMP-1, regulate hepatic angiogenesis and vascular remodeling,[17-19] and increase vascular resistance by contractility properties.[20] Induction of MF apoptosis is believed to result in decreased amount of fibril-forming collagens, activation of MMPs that degrade collagens from ECM, and decreased vascular resistance in hepatic vasculature. The ultimate outcome in this process is the regression of liver fibrosis. Apoptosis of MFs can be induced by four mechanisms as described below:

1- Receptor-ligand mediated MF apoptosis

Table 1 summarizes some of the most important ligands, which interact with specific receptors and eventually lead to HSC or MF apoptosis. As described, other mechanisms contributing to fibrosis regression might be perpetuated by receptor-ligand interactions.
Table 1

Receptor-ligand mediated myofibroblast apoptosis

Ligand Receptor Molecular Mediation/Pathway Reference(s)
Adiponectin Adipo-R1Decreasing TGF-β1 expression [21]
Adipo-R2Suppressing PDGF-stimulation for HSCs proliferation
Suppressing MF proliferation
Inhibiting NF-κB and MF apoptosis
Cannabinoids CB2R*Inducing intracellular oxidative stress and MF apoptosis [22-26]
Nerve growth factor TrkA neurotrophinInhibiting NF-κB and promoting MF apoptosis [27,28]
TrkB neurotrophin
TrkC neurotrophin
Hepatocyte growth factor c-MetSuppressing PDGF-stimulation for HSCs proliferation [29-31]
Suppressing MF proliferation
Inhibiting TGF-β expression
Promoting MF apoptosis

* Cannabinoids may interact with CB1 receptor and promote fibrogenic processes by transdifferentiating HSCs to MF. CB1 receptor antagonists (SR141617A) may prevent fibrosis by blocking this pathway.[23]

Cannabinoids, CB; Hepatic stellate cell, HSCs; Nuclear factor-κB, NF-κB; Transforming growth factor, TGF-β; Platelet derived growth factor, PDGF; Myofibroblast, MF

* Cannabinoids may interact with CB1 receptor and promote fibrogenic processes by transdifferentiating HSCs to MF. CB1 receptor antagonists (SR141617A) may prevent fibrosis by blocking this pathway.[23] Cannabinoids, CB; Hepatic stellate cell, HSCs; Nuclear factor-κB, NF-κB; Transforming growth factor, TGF-β; Platelet derived growth factor, PDGF; Myofibroblast, MF Lysyl oxidase like 2, LOXL2; Bromodomain-containing protein 4, BRD4; Nuclear receptor 4 A1, NR4A1; Farnesoid X receptor, FXR; Renin angiotensin system, RAS; Eggshell membrane, ESM; Angiotensin converting enzyme, ACE; Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase, TIMP; Matrix metalloproteinase, MMP; Hepatocyte growth factor, HGF; Interferon, IFN; Cannabinoid receptor, CBR; Interleukin, IL; Helper T cell, Th; Cannabinoids, CB; Hepatic stellate cell, HSC; Nuclear factor-κB, NF-κB; Transforming growth factor, TGF; Platelet derived growth factor, PDGF; Myofibroblast, MF; not available, NA

2- Transcriptional factors involved in MF apoptosis

There are many transcriptional regulators, which may promote HSC/MF toward apoptosis or survival. The most important is nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), which interact with Bcl-2 protein family, p53, and many other factors within MF cells.[32-36] Expression of NF-κB guarantees MF survival. NF-κB in MF nucleus produces two anti-apoptotic proteins, namely Gadd45β and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2. Gadd45β has negative control on c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs).[37] In the cytoplasm, JNKs themselves regulate pro-apoptotic factors such as p53 and pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 (Bax and PUMA),[38] which lead to cytochrome c release from mitochondria and promote caspase-3 dependent apoptosis of MF.[33,39,40] Another important transcription factor in the resolution of hepatic fibrosis is peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ). PPAR-γ yields its effects through inhibition of PDGF-stimulated HSC activation,[41] TGF-β expression,[42] and decreasing collagen production.[41] Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that expression of PPAR-γ decreases during fibrogenic processes.[41,43,44] Re-expression of PPAR-γ may revert HSCs activation and may be of worth in resolution of hepatic fibrosis.

3– Role of ECM in MF apoptosis

It is well known that ECM components influence liver fibrosis. Intact collagen I and TIMP-1 promote MF survival[45,46] while MMPs especially MMP-2[47] oppose with collagen production and liver fibrosis. These interactions are mainly regulated by α/β integrin transmembrane proteins. α3/β2 integrin can prevent mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in contrast to its antagonist that may activate p53 and give rise to apoptosis in MF cells.[48] Disruption in α3/β2 integrin causes increased amount of MMPs and a decrease in expression of TIMP-1; both of which promote MF apoptosis.[48]

4- Immune cells and their roles in fibrosis regression

Fibrosis formation in the liver is under close monitoring of the immune system. NK cells and IFN-γ play important role in resolution of hepatic fibrosis. NK cells have antifibrotic properties, which decrease with progression of liver fibrosis.[49] NK cells directly invade MF cells and induce MF apoptosis.[50,51] This process is mediated by TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL).[52,53] IFN-γ enhances the ability of NK cells in killing MFs and may induce HSC apoptosis. It is noteworthy that TLR3 induces NK cells’ activation.[54] IFN-γ mediates HSCs apoptosis[55] and inhibition of HSCs proliferation by producing type 1 IFN-β are other possible pathways acting under control of Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3).[56]

Clinical Implications

Thanks to the recent molecular discoveries of the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis, applying interventions to reverse the process of fibrogenesis seems imminent. Two main approaches are pursued in clinical reversion of liver fibrosis. First, eliminating the underlying insult from the hepatocytes and the second, pointing to the fibrosis process after the effect of injuries on different components of liver tissues has ensued.

Eliminating the underlying injuries

The first line of battling liver fibrosis is to eliminate the inciting stimulus. Spontaneous reversion of liver fibrosis is rarely reported, but there are many reports of fibrosis reversal following treatment of different types of underlying liver diseases, including autoimmune hepatitis,[57-59] hemochromatosis,[60,61] and biliary cirrhosis.[62] In the following paragraphs, reversibility of viral hepatitis, alcoholic hepatitis, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are discussed in more details.

- Viral hepatitis

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown that treatment of chronic hepatitis B with oral nucleoside analogues not only delays fibrosis progression, but also prevents decompensation in patients with advanced liver fibrosis.[63] Regression have been reported by lamivudine,[64] telbivudine,[65] entecavir,[66] adefovir[67] and tenofovir.[68] Also, interferon-based therapies improve histological outcomes, and decrease the incidence of cirrhosis, and the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).[69,70] Multiple trials have proven the effectiveness of treatment against hepatitis C.[71] Older treatment options for hepatitis C with peginterferon and/or ribavirin were associated with regression of liver fibrosis,[72] along with new options such as daclatasvir, sofosbuvir, and simeprevir.[73-75] The advent of highly efficacious direct antiviral agents (DAAs) with high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with hepatitis C is expected to be associated with promising effects on histology including fibrosis regression.[75] This regression in fibrosis results in decreased morbidity and mortality in patients with hepatitis C.[76] Recent studies have shown that statins may be associated with reduced risk of fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis C.[77,78]

- Alcoholic hepatitis

Alcohol abstinence is the mainstay for fibrosis regression in alcoholic liver disease, and is accompanied by clinical and histological improvement.[79-81] Other drugs such as pentoxifylline, silymarin, and polyenylphosphatidylcholine (lecithin) might be of clinical importance in reversing fibrosis in alcoholic hepatitis.[82]

- Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Numerous drugs have been investigated to reverse fibrosis in NASH, the most advanced type of NAFLD. Based on meta-analyses, none is associated with regression in liver fibrosis.[83-85] Recent studies have shown that liraglutide, obeticholic acid, and telmisartan may reverse hepatic fibrosis in human subjects with NASH.[86-88] Weight loss has significant effect on histological features of NASH including liver fibrosis.[89,90] Several studies have shown improvement of steatosis and inflammation in patients with NAFLD after bariatric surgery. In a meta-analysis, authors looked at 766 paired liver biopsies from 15 different studies. The combined results showed that 91.6% of the patients had improvement in steatosis, 81.3% of the patients had improvement in steatohepatitis, and 65.5% of them had improvement in fibrosis.[91] Another Cochrane systematic review of 21 studies with histological outcomes of bariatric surgery looked at 21 prospective or retrospective cohort studies, which showed improvement of steatosis or inflammation in most studies except for four studies that showed worsening of fibrosis.[92] The fact that some studies showed worsening of liver fibrosis cannot be overlooked. Further long-term and well-designed prospective studies are needed to address these issues. Interestingly, in a meta-analysis, Singh and colleagues showed that up to 8% of patients with NAFL and 25% of patients with NASH have spontaneous improvement in the amount.[93]

Pointing to the fibrosis process

Opposing to fibrosis process, researchers have worked on different aspects of fibrosis development. summarizes the most important aspects of fibrosis process, which are being targeted in order to reverse fibrosis progression. Figure 2 depicts various aspects of fibrosis process targeted by investigational agents.
Fig.2

Different strategies to oppose liver fibrosis

Different strategies to oppose liver fibrosis The most effective way is to eliminate the underlying insults (A), but some agents like glucocorticoid and UDCA decrease fibrogenesis by reducing the background inflammation and immune response (B). PPAR agonists, rIL-22, and some others target HSCs trans-differentiation (C), while TGF-β antagonists, bosentan, and caspase inhibitors inhibit downstream response cascade after HSCs activation (D). NF-κB inhibitors, melatonin, CB1R antagonists, CB2R agonists, and NK cells activators promote MF into apoptosis (E) but MMPs and TIMP inhibitors along with AB0023 (LOXL2 monoclonal antibody) augment scar degradation (F). Ursodeoxycholic acid, UDCA; Proliferator-activated receptor, PPAR; Interleukin 22-recombinant protein, rIL-22; Hepatic stellate cell, HSCs; Transforming growth factor β, TGF-β; Nuclear factor-κB, NF-κB; Cannabinoid receptor type 1, CB1R; Cannabinoid receptor type 2, CB2R; Natural killer, NK; Myofibroblast, MF; Matrix metalloproteinases, MMPs; Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases, TIMP; Lysyl oxidase like 2, LOXL2;

Future Prospect

As discussed earlier, understanding molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in fibrosis progression could be translated into therapeutic targets in the future. Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, non-coding RNAs, and histone modification has been shown to modify fibrogenesis process and are new frontiers in developing therapeutic approaches. Recent findings show that DNA methylation orchestrates HSCs trans-differentiation from quiescent state to activated form, suggesting that enzymes, which catalyze DNA methylation, could be potential new targets in battling fibrosis.[149-151] Another new area of research is the role of microRNA-122 in amplification of HCV replication. While in vivo targeting of microRNA-122 and decreasing its level lead to reductions in HCV RNA level and also cholesterol, microRNA-122 deletion leads to recruitment of inflammatory cells and an increase in inflammatory mediators.[152-155] Further studies are needed to differentiate between pharmacological targeting and genetic deletion of microRNA-122. Accordingly, epigenetic modifications are novel therapeutic targets in drug development and can potentially be used as non-invasive markers for assessing fibrosis. Recent advances offer cell therapy, more precisely cell transplantation, as a propitious candidate for treating liver fibrosis.[156,157] Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to induce improvement in fibrotic liver due to their capacity to secrete anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory factors, in addition to trans-differentiation to hepatocyte.[158] Baligar and colleagues have recently demonstrated that bone marrow-derived CD45 (BM-CD45) cells are superior candidates for the treatment of the liver fibrosis through functional and structural improvement in fibrotic tissues.[159] Future trials are needed to validate effectiveness, and safety, and investigate the role of cell transplantation in treating hepatic fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Since liver fibrogenesis and ECM synthesis are dynamic and reversible phenomena, the process of HSCs activation is regarded as the main potential target for therapeutic interventions besides resolving the underlying insult. Future research will validate safety, effectiveness, and accuracy of therapeutic interventions and non-invasive strategies for assessing hepatic fibrosis. Interfering molecular mechanisms along with cell therapy and gene therapy are among the most valuable strategies for battling liver fibrosis. Future basic studies and then, animal and clinical trials will be prerequisites for reversing and targeting liver fibrosis.
Table 2

Different strategies for reversing hepatic fibrosis

Agent Target Mechanism(s) Reference(s)
1: Reducing inflammation and immune response before HSCs activation
Herbal medicinesDifferent agents in this categories along with their mechanisms of action are discussed in detail elsewhere [94]
GlucocorticoidsImmune systemReduction of inflammation mostly in autoimmune hepatitis [57]
CaffeineNANA [95-98]
Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)CholangiocytesReduction in the cytotoxicity of bile acids [99]
Protection of hepatocytes against bile acid-induced apoptosis
2: Inhibiting HSCs activation
α-tocopherolOxidative stress pathwayDecreasing oxidative stress [100]
ThiazolidinedionesPPAR FamilyInhibition of PDGF stimulated HSCs activation [101-103]
Oleoylethanolamide Modulation of the TLR4-mediated signaling pathway
ESM (PPAR agonist)
JQ1 (BRD4 antagonist)BRD4Abrogates cytokine-induced activation of HSCs [104]
Imatinib mesylatePDGF Suppresses PDGF receptor phosphorylation and HSCs activation [105]
ACE InhibitorsRASDown regulate angiotensin II receptor on HSCs, which is responsible for HSCs proliferation and contraction [106-110]
Suppress activation of HSCs by TGF-β expression
Recombinant IL-22Th22Attenuation of HSC activation [111]
Downregulation of the levels of inflammatory cytokines
3: Inhibiting response cascade after HSCs activation
GW6604(TGF-β antagonist) TGF-βInhibition of TGF-β signal transduction [112]
cytosporone B(NR4A1 gene agonist) TGF-βTermination in TGF-β signaling [113]
BosentanEndothelinEndothelium-receptor antagonist [114]
Halofuginone Blocking collagen expression via inhibition of Smad3 phosphorylation downstream of the TGFβ signaling pathway [115,116]
Caspase inhibitorsCaspaseInhibit effector of apoptosis signaling in hepatocytes [117]
FXR analoguesFXRImprove hepatocyte integrity [118,119]
Reduce HSCs contractility
Reduce collagen I levels
Inhibit TIMP-1
4: Promoting activated HSCs (myofibroblasts) into apoptosis
GliotoxinNF-κBInhibition of NF-κB pathway [120,121]
SulfasalazineNF-κBInhibition of NF-κB pathway [122]
ThalidomideNF-κBInhibition of NF-κB pathway [123]
Suppression of TNF-α and TGF-β1 production of Kupffer's cells
MelatoninNF-κBInhibiting necroptosis-associated inflammatory signaling [124,125]
CB1R antagonistsCB1RInhibition of Smad3 phosphorylation downstream of the TGFβ signaling pathway [126-128]
Reduce cellular proliferation
Promote myofibroblasts apoptosis
CB2R agonistCB2RInhibits MF proliferation [129,130]
Induces MF apoptosis via induction of intracellular oxidative stress
IFN-αNK cellsPromotes NK cell activity [131,132]
IFN-γ Promotes HSCs killing
Inhibits HSCs activation
HGF-Inhibition of TGF-β signaling and hepatocyte apoptosis [133-135]
Suppression of TGF-β
Induction of collagenase expression
Growth inhibition and apoptosis of HSCs
CYD0682HSCsPromotes HSCs apoptosis [136]
Inhibition of HSC proliferation
Downregulation of ECM proteins in activated HSC
Green AsparagusTNF-αInactivation of TGF-β1/Smad signaling and c-Jun N-terminal kinases [137]
5: Enhancing scar degradation
CurcuminTGF-βOppose TGF-β signaling and aid matrix degradation [138-141]
TGF-β antagonist
recombinant Smad7
αVβ6 integrin antagonistIntegrinPrevents TGF-β signaling [142,143]
Promotes HSCs apoptosis
MMP-sMMPSuppress trans-differentiation of HSCs to MF [144,145]
Increase HSCs apoptosis
Degrade collagens in extracellular matrix
TIMP inhibitorsTIMPDecrease in HSC activation and MMP-2 activity [146]
AB0023 (LOXL2 monoclonal antibody) LOXL2Catalyzing the cross linking of extracellular collagens [147,148]
Reduction in activated fibroblasts
Decreased production of growth factors and cytokines
Decreased TGF-β pathway signaling

Lysyl oxidase like 2, LOXL2; Bromodomain-containing protein 4, BRD4; Nuclear receptor 4 A1, NR4A1; Farnesoid X receptor, FXR; Renin angiotensin system, RAS; Eggshell membrane, ESM; Angiotensin converting enzyme, ACE; Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase, TIMP; Matrix metalloproteinase, MMP; Hepatocyte growth factor, HGF; Interferon, IFN; Cannabinoid receptor, CBR; Interleukin, IL; Helper T cell, Th; Cannabinoids, CB; Hepatic stellate cell, HSC; Nuclear factor-κB, NF-κB; Transforming growth factor, TGF; Platelet derived growth factor, PDGF; Myofibroblast, MF; not available, NA

  158 in total

1.  Impact of immunosuppressive treatment on liver fibrosis in autoimmune hepatitis.

Authors:  Mehdi Mohamadnejad; Reza Malekzadeh; Siavosh Nasseri-Moghaddam; Sepideh Hagh-Azali; Nasser Rakhshani; Seyed Mohamad Tavangar; Mojtaba Sedaghat; Seyed Meysam Alimohamadi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  The αvβ1 integrin plays a critical in vivo role in tissue fibrosis.

Authors:  Nilgun I Reed; Hyunil Jo; Chun Chen; Kazuyuki Tsujino; Thomas D Arnold; William F DeGrado; Dean Sheppard
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  NK cells from HCV-infected patients effectively induce apoptosis of activated primary human hepatic stellate cells in a TRAIL-, FasL- and NKG2D-dependent manner.

Authors:  Andreas Glässner; Marianne Eisenhardt; Benjamin Krämer; Christian Körner; Martin Coenen; Tilman Sauerbruch; Ulrich Spengler; Jacob Nattermann
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 5.662

4.  STAT1 inhibits liver fibrosis in mice by inhibiting stellate cell proliferation and stimulating NK cell cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Won-Il Jeong; Ogyi Park; Svetlana Radaeva; Bin Gao
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  Modulation of hepatic stellate cells and reversibility of hepatic fibrosis.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Xin Deng; Jian Liang
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Endothelin antagonism in experimental hepatic fibrosis. Implications for endothelin in the pathogenesis of wound healing.

Authors:  D C Rockey; J J Chung
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Abrogation of the antifibrotic effects of natural killer cells/interferon-gamma contributes to alcohol acceleration of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Won-Il Jeong; Ogyi Park; Bin Gao
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Role of interleukin-1 and its antagonism of hepatic stellate cell proliferation and liver fibrosis in the Abcb4(-/-) mouse model.

Authors:  Florian P Reiter; Ralf Wimmer; Lena Wottke; Renate Artmann; Jutta M Nagel; Manuel O Carranza; Doris Mayr; Christian Rust; Peter Fickert; Michael Trauner; Alexander L Gerbes; Simon Hohenester; Gerald U Denk
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-18

9.  Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, to treat chronic infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in non-responders to pegylated interferon and ribavirin and treatment-naive patients: the COSMOS randomised study.

Authors:  Eric Lawitz; Mark S Sulkowski; Reem Ghalib; Maribel Rodriguez-Torres; Zobair M Younossi; Ana Corregidor; Edwin DeJesus; Brian Pearlman; Mordechai Rabinovitz; Norman Gitlin; Joseph K Lim; Paul J Pockros; John D Scott; Bart Fevery; Tom Lambrecht; Sivi Ouwerkerk-Mahadevan; Katleen Callewaert; William T Symonds; Gaston Picchio; Karen L Lindsay; Maria Beumont; Ira M Jacobson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Liver fibrosis and mechanisms of the protective action of medicinal plants targeting inflammation and the immune response.

Authors:  Florent Duval; Jorge E Moreno-Cuevas; María Teresa González-Garza; Carmen Maldonado-Bernal; Delia Elva Cruz-Vega
Journal:  Int J Inflam       Date:  2015-04-14
View more
  6 in total

1.  Green Synthesis of Silymarin-Chitosan Nanoparticles as a New Nano Formulation with Enhanced Anti-Fibrotic Effects against Liver Fibrosis.

Authors:  Abdullah Saad Abdullah; Ibrahim El Tantawy El Sayed; Abdel Moneim A El-Torgoman; Abul Kalam; S Wageh; Maher A Kamel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 6.208

2.  Cellular and molecular effects of silymarin on the transdifferentiation processes of LX-2 cells and its connection with lipid metabolism.

Authors:  Caio Mateus Silva; Gustavo Duarte Ferrari; Luciane Carla Alberici; Osmar Malaspina; Karen C M Moraes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  A model integrating donor gene polymorphisms predicts fibrosis after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Xueyou Zhang; Qi Ling; Shusen Zheng; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Liver fibrosis-induced muscle atrophy is mediated by elevated levels of circulating TNFα.

Authors:  Tamaki Kurosawa; Momo Goto; Noriyuki Kaji; Satoshi Aikiyo; Taiki Mihara; Madoka Ikemoto-Uezumi; Masashi Toyoda; Nobuo Kanazawa; Tatsu Nakazawa; Masatoshi Hori; Akiyoshi Uezumi
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of anti-hepatic fibrosis drugs.

Authors:  Konstantinos Damiris; Zaid H Tafesh; Nikolaos Pyrsopoulos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Preparation and Characterization of Silymarin-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles with Enhanced Anti-Fibrotic Therapeutic Effects against Hepatic Fibrosis in Rats: Role of MicroRNAs as Molecular Targets.

Authors:  Abdullah Saad Abdullah; Ibrahim El Tantawy El Sayed; Abdel Moneim A El-Torgoman; Noweir Ahmad Alghamdi; Sami Ullah; S Wageh; Maher A Kamel
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-11-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.