| Literature DB >> 30186170 |
Hui-Hui Xiao1, Tung-Ting Sham2, Chi-On Chan1,2, Meng-Heng Li2, Xi Chen3, Qing-Chang Wu4, Daniel Kam-Wah Mok1,2, Xin-Sheng Yao4, Man-Sau Wong1,2.
Abstract
The <span class="Chemical">lignan-rich fraction (SWR) of <span class="Species">Sambucus Williamsii Ramulus, a folk herbal medicine in China for treatment of bone diseases, has previously reported to exert protective effects on bone without exerting uterotrophic effects in ovariectomized (OVX) mice. The aim of the present study was to identify the potential metabolites and the associated metabolic pathways that contribute to the beneficial effects of SWR on bone in vivo. Aged female Sprague Dawley rats (9 months old) were either sham-operated or ovariectomized for 12 weeks, before receiving treatment for another 12 weeks with the following treatment groups (n = 12 each): vehicle (Sham), vehicle (OVX), Premarin (130 μg/kg) or low (57 mg/kg), medium (114 mg/kg), and high (228 mg/kg) doses of SWR. The results showed that SWRH significantly suppressed bone loss, improved bone micro-architecture and increased bone strength on tibia without stimulating uterus weight gain in OVX rats. Premarin exerted similar bone protective effects as SWRH but elicited uterotrophic effects in OVX rats. The metabolic profiles of serum samples were analyzed by using ultra-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of flight mass spectrometry and gas chromatography time-of flight mass spectrometry, and the metabolites that were significantly altered were identified by multivariate statistical analysis. Our study indicated that SWRH effectively restored the changes of 26 metabolites induced by estrogen-deficiency in OVX rats, which related to lipids, amino acids, tryptophan metabolisms, and anti-oxidative system. A subsequent validation showed that the serum level of superoxide dismutase and catalase were indeed up-regulated, while the serotonin level in a tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (TPH1) high expressing cells (rats RBL-2H3 cells) was down regulated after treatment with SWR. The results also suggested that the gut-microbiota may play an important role on the bone protective effects of SWR. The current study provides insight for understanding the unique mechanism of actions of SWR that might be involved in achieving bone protective effects in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: Sambucus Williamsii Ramulus; amino acid metabolism; anti-osteoporosis; anti-oxidative action; lignan; metabolomics
Year: 2018 PMID: 30186170 PMCID: PMC6110923 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00932
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Bone parameters, body weight changes, uterine index, and levels of biochemical markers in serum and urine of rats.
| Bone parameters measured by Micro CT | Bone content | BMD (mgHA/cm3) | 903.4 ± 8.6 | 373.7 ± 7.8 | 300.4 ± 18.0 | 140.6 ± 13.8 | 199.8 ± 12.6 | 131.5 ± 11.5 | 172.6 ± 17.4 | 188.1 ± 17.4 |
| Tb.N (mm−1) | 4.14 ± 0.15 | 2.14 ± 0.23 | 4.05 ± 0.10 | 1.99 ± 0.12 | 2.70 ± 0.16 | 2.22 ± 0.19 | 2.38 ± 0.11 | 2.60 ± 0.18 | ||
| Tb.Sp (mm) | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | ||
| Bone size | BV/TV (%) | 0.204 ± 0.005 | 0.093 ± 0.017 | 0.446 ± 0.029 | 0.176 ± 0.010 | 0.254 ± 0.020 | 0.189 ± 0.013 | 0.205 ± 0.016 | 0.245 ± 0.021 | |
| Bone structure | Conn.D (mm−3) | 53.3 ± 3.65 | 13.7 ± 3.44 | 83.9 ± 5.04 | 21.3 ± 2.24 | 36.4 ± 3.23 | 21.9 ± 1.79 | 27.0 ± 3.20 | 38.0 ± 5.57 | |
| SMI | 2.01 ± 0.15 | 2.46 ± 0.13# | 1.04 ± 0.29 | 1.95 ± 0.11 | 1.26 ± 0.12 | 1.67 ± 0.09 | 1.54 ± 0.07 | 1.37 ± 0.08 | ||
| Ultimate Load(N) | 151.7 ± 9.0 | 125.0 ± 6.9# | 148.4 ± 4.7 | 118.9 ± 3.5# | 137.8 ± 5.5 | 125.0 ± 6.5 | 135.1 ± 8.2 | 143.5 ± 6.8 | ||
| Biomechani–cal properties | DISP (mm) | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.46 ± 0.03# | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | |
| YLD.STR(Mpa) | 217.2 ± 7.4 | 147.1 ± 5.1 | 156.6 ± 5.0 | 126.3 ± 3.5 | 151.4 ± 5.2 | 138.6 ± 4.8 | 148.9 ± 4.0 | 152.6 ± 4.5 | ||
| Modulus (N/mm2) | 1732 ± 67 | 1357 ± 29 | 1726.8 ± 90.5 | 1285.8 ± 49.8 | 1718.6 ± 72.5 | 1398.8 ± 70.7 | 1612.6 ± 88.5 | 1774.0 ± 59.4 | ||
| Weight change (%) | / | / | / | −4.79 ± 1.56 | 0.68 ± 0.87# | −6.67 ± 2.01 | 0.57 ± 1.12 | 0.35 ± 0.79 | −1.40 ± 0.54 | |
| Uterus index (mg/g) | / | / | / | 1.73 ± 0.16 | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 1.16 ± 0.10 | 0.51 ± 0.09 | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 0.53 ± 0.10 | |
| Serum Ca (mg/dl) | / | / | / | 7.80 ± 0.24 | 7.78 ± 0.37 | 7.91 ± 0.26 | 8.41 ± 0.26 | 7.96 ± 0.22 | 8.19 ± 0.30 | |
| Serum P (mg/dl) | / | / | / | 5.52 ± 0.26 | 4.67 ± 0.22# | 4.50 ± 0.28 | 4.32 ± 0.25 | 5.69 ± 0.16 | 6.05 ± 0.36 | |
| Serum OCN (ng/ml) | / | / | / | 108.7 ± 13.1 | 222.4 ± 20.3 | 192.9 ± 5.7 | 194.1 ± 12.2 | 167.1 ± 13.4 | 156.2 ± 13.0 | |
| Urine Ca/Cr (mg/dl) | / | / | / | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.03# | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | |
| Urine P/Cr (mg/dl) | / | / | / | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.05# | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | |
/, undetermined parameter.
Nine-month old SD rats were subjected to the following treatment for 12 weeks started at 12 week after ovariectomy: Sham, Sham-operated, vehicle-treated; OVX, ovariectomized, vehicle-treated; PR, ovariectomized, Premarin-treated (0.13 mg/kg); SWRL, ovariectomized, low dose SWR-treated (57 mg/kg); SWRM, ovariectomized, mid dose SWR-treated (114 mg/kg); SWRH, ovariectomized, high dose SWR-treated (228 mg/kg). Results were expressed as mean ± SEM.
P < 0.001 vs. control;
P < 0.05,
P < 0.01,
P < 0.001 vs. OVX.
Figure 1Effects of SWRH on bone specific mRNA expression in rat tibia. Nine-month old SD rats were subjected to the following treatment for 12 weeks started at 12 week after ovariectomy: Sham, Sham-operated, vehicle-treated; OVX, ovariectomized, vehicle-treated; PR, ovariectomized, Premarin-treated (0.13 mg/kg); SWRH, ovariectomized, high dose SWR-treated (228 mg/kg). (A) ALP, alkaline phosphatase; (B) OCN, osteocalcin; (C) Runx2, runt-related transcription factor 2; (D) OPG/RANKL, OPG, osteoprotegerin; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand; (E) TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase; (F) Ctsk, cathepsin K; GAPDH, glyceraldehydes 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. #P < 0.05, P < 0.001 vs. control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. OVX.
Figure 2PCA, OPLS-DA, and PLS-DA score plots in UPLC-MS and GC-MS. (i) PCA score plot, (ii) OPLS-DA score plot, and (iii) PLS-DA score plot of metabolites for (A) UPLC-MS acquired in negative ESI mode and (B) GC-MS. OPLS-DA score plot: UPLC-MS, R2X (cum) = 0.249, R2Y (cum) = 0.962, Q2 (cum) = 0.558; GC-MS, R2X (cum) = 0.346, R2Y (cum) = 0.910, Q2 (cum) 0.688. PLS-DA score plot: UPLC-MS, R2X (cum) = 0.343, R2Y (cum) = 0.760, Q2 (cum) 0.599; GC-MS, R2X(cum) = 0.252, R2Y(cum) = 0.795, Q2 (cum) = 0.510.
Identified differential metabolites in serum accountable for the discrimination between OVX rats and Sham rats by UPLC-MS in negative ESI mode.
| Uric Acid | 0.59 | [M-H]- | 167.0211 | 167.0205 | −3.59 | 1.39 | 1.26 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.016 | 0.039 |
| Succinic acid[ | 0.75 | [M-H]- | 117.0193 | 117.019 | −2.56 | 1.93 | 1.06 | ↑ | – | 0.007 | 0.926 |
| Tryptophan[ | 2.53 | [M-H]- | 203.0826 | 203.0821 | −2.46 | 1.32 | 1.43 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.023 | 0.002 |
| 2.73 | [M-H]- | 187.0071 | 187.0065 | −3.21 | 0.39 | 0.23 | ↓ | ↓ | 0.033 | 0.001 | |
| Taurocholate[ | 3.23 | [M-H]- | 514.2844 | 514.2841 | −0.58 | 0.24 | 0.37 | ↓ | – | 0.034 | 0.264 |
| Sulfate metabolite 1 | 3.52 | N/A | 427.1796 | 427.1801 | 1.17 | 2.52 | 0.32 | ↑ | ↓ | 0.039 | 0.006 |
| Taurochenodeoxycholate[ | 3.77 | [M-H]- | 498.2895 | 498.2891 | −0.80 | 0.37 | 0.26 | – | ↓ | 0.053 | 0.002 |
| Unidentified 1 | 3.92 | N/A | 413.2003 | 413.2001 | −0.57 | 11.96 | 0.48 | ↑ | – | 0.009 | 0.079 |
| Unidentified 2 | 4.30 | N/A | 405.2646 | 405.2643 | −0.86 | 6.85 | 1.16 | ↑ | – | 0.013 | 0.964 |
| Unidentified 3 | 4.50 | N/A | 347.2228 | 347.2223 | −1.39 | 9.49 | 1.81 | ↑ | – | <0.001 | 0.336 |
| Sulfate metabolite 2 | 4.86 | N/A | 455.2473 | 455.2471 | −0.44 | 8.88 | 0.32 | ↑ | – | 0.003 | 0.051 |
| Unidentified 4 | 4.89 | N/A | 349.2384 | 349.238 | −1.24 | 12.28 | 0.44 | ↑ | – | 0.009 | 0.235 |
| Deoxycortisol/isomer 1 | 5.00 | [M-H]- | 345.2071 | 345.2068 | −0.87 | 3.87 | 0.85 | ↑ | – | 0.001 | 0.790 |
| Deoxycortisol/isomer 2 | 5.18 | [M-H]- | 345.2071 | 345.2067 | −1.16 | 5.20 | 0.17 | ↑ | ↓ | 0.024 | 0.013 |
| LysoPC (20:4) | 7.18 | [M+FA-H]- | 588.3307 | 588.3305 | −0.34 | 1.24 | 1.14 | ↑ | – | 0.010 | 0.127 |
| LysoPC (22:6) | 7.23 | [M+FA-H]- | 612.3307 | 612.3306 | −0.16 | 1.86 | 1.36 | ↑ | ↑ | <0.001 | 0.013 |
| LysoPE (18:2) | 7.33 | [M-H]- | 476.2783 | 476.2779 | −0.84 | 0.75 | 0.66 | ↓ | ↓ | 0.030 | 0.001 |
| LysoPC (22:6) | 7.64 | [M+FA-H]- | 612.3307 | 612.3307 | 0 | 1.58 | 1.30 | ↑ | ↑ | <0.001 | 0.019 |
| LysoPC (22:5) | 8.79 | [M+FA-H]- | 614.3463 | 614.3463 | 0.49 | 3.58 | 1.60 | ↑ | ↑ | <0.001 | 0.035 |
| LysoPE (22:5) | 9.14 | [M-H]- | 526.2939 | 526.2948 | 1.71 | 1.71 | 1.01 | ↑ | – | <0.001 | 0.936 |
| LysoPE (18:1) | 9.31 | [M-H]- | 478.2939 | 478.2938 | −0.21 | 0.80 | 0.80 | ↓ | ↓ | 0.018 | 0.018 |
| LysoPC (22:4) | 10.12 | [M+FA-H]- | 616.362 | 616.3619 | −0.16 | 1.51 | 1.48 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.012 | 0.011 |
| LysoPC (18:0) | 10.77 | [M+FA-H]- | 568.362 | 568.3618 | −0.35 | 1.13 | 1.13 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Docosahexaenoic acid[ | 12.35 | [M-H]- | 327.233 | 327.2326 | −1.22 | 2.28 | 1.22 | ↑ | – | 0.002 | 0.766 |
| Arachidonic acid[ | 12.48 | [M-H]- | 303.233 | 303.2323 | −2.31 | 1.28 | 1.20 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.001 | 0.018 |
| Linoleic acid[ | 12.56 | [M-H]- | 279.233 | 279.2325 | −1.79 | 1.77 | 1.43 | ↑ | ↑ | <0.001 | 0.012 |
| Oleic acid[ | 13.06 | [M-H]- | 281.2486 | 281.2483 | −1.07 | 1.82 | 1.62 | ↑ | ↑ | <0.001 | 0.004 |
Nine-month old SD rats were sham operated or ovariectomized. At 12 week after ovariectomy, the rats were vehicle treated for 12 weeks. Log.
Equal variance: Tukey HSD;
Unequal variance: Tamhane's T2 post-hoc test; N/A, not available; FA, formic acid;
Identified with authentic standards; ↑ upregulated vs. OVX group; ↓ downregulated vs. OVX group; –, no significant change.
Identified differential metabolites accountable for the discrimination between OVX rats and Sham rats by GC-TOF/MS.
| Alanine | 5.93 | 116.10 | 1.45 | 1.71 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.048 | 0.002 |
| 2-hydroxybutyric acid | 6.28 | 131.10 | 1.85 | 0.66 | ↑ | – | 0.012 | 0.258 |
| 3-hydroxybutyric acid | 6.72 | 233.12 | 2.98 | 1.54 | ↑ | – | 0.010 | 0.457 |
| 2-aminobutyric acid | 6.9 | 130.11 | 2.38 | 1.03 | ↑ | – | 0.001 | 0.689 |
| Valine | 7.53 | 144.14 | 1.40 | 1.28 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.001 | 0.014 |
| Urea | 7.83 | 147.08 | 0.53 | 0.40 | ↓ | ↓ | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Leucine | 8.31 | 158.15 | 1.33 | 1.31 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Isoleucine | 8.61 | 218.11 | 1.43 | 1.36 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.004 | 0.019 |
| Glycine | 8.78 | 248.15 | 0.70 | 1.25 | ↓ | ↑ | 0.002 | 0.030 |
| Succinic acid | 8.84 | 147.07 | 1.97 | 1.30 | ↑ | – | 0.021 | 0.368 |
| Fumaric acid | 9.27 | 245.07 | 1.48 | 1.37 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.003 | 0.018 |
| Serine | 9.54 | 204.14 | 1.52 | 1.54 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.019 | 0.005 |
| Malic acid | 11.18 | 233.11 | 2.03 | 1.13 | ↑ | – | <0.001 | 0.719 |
| Methionine | 11.51 | 176.10 | 1.32 | 1.39 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| 2-ketoglutaric acid | 12.22 | 198.06 | 2.33 | 1.21 | ↑ | – | 0.001 | 0.460 |
| Glutamic acid | 12.75 | 246.14 | 1.41 | 1.61 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.018 | 0.001 |
| Ribose | 13.68 | 73.05 | 1.66 | 1.98 | ↑ | ↑ | 0.019 | 0.002 |
| Palmitic acid | 18.71 | 328.29 | 1.88 | 1.32 | ↑ | – | 0.001 | 0.269 |
| Linoleic acid | 21.38 | 337.27 | 2.29 | 1.35 | ↑ | – | 0.001 | 0.395 |
| Oleic acid | 21.48 | 339.29 | 2.35 | 1.34 | ↑ | – | 0.002 | 0.560 |
| Elaidic acid | 21.58 | 339.28 | 2.16 | 1.26 | ↑ | – | <0.001 | 0.444 |
| Stearic acid | 21.91 | 341.30 | 1.60 | 1.23 | ↑ | – | 0.001 | 0.210 |
| Unknown-sugar metabolite 1 | 22.26 | 217.11 | 0.52 | 0.39 | ↓ | ↓ | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| Unknown-sugar metabolite 2 | 23.28 | 204.11 | 0.36 | 0.31 | ↓ | ↓ | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Nine-month old SD rats were sham operated or ovariectomized. At 12 week after ovariectomy, the rats were vehicle treated for 12 weeks. Log.
Identified with authentic standards: ↑ upregulated vs. OVX group; ↓ downregulated vs. OVX group; –, no significant change.
Figure 3Relative quantities of endogenous metabolites significantly changed after SWRH treatment. Bars represent the mean relative levels and standard deviations. (A) UPLC-MS metabolites; (B) GC-MS metabolites. ∧Identified with authentic standards. #P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001 OVX vs. Sham; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 SWRH vs. OVX.
Figure 4Summary of pathway analysis with Metaboanalyst. (A) Pathway impact: (a) aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis; (b) valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis; (c) alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism. (B) Metabolite sets enrichment overview.
Figure 5Effects of SWRH on anti-oxidative system in aged Ovariectomized rats. Nine-month old SD rats were subjected to the following treatment for 12 weeks started at 12 week after ovariectomy: Sham, Sham-operated, vehicle-treated; OVX, ovariectomized, vehicle-treated; PR, ovariectomized, Premarin-treated (0.13 mg/kg); SWRH, ovariectomized, high dose SWR-treated (228 mg/kg). (A) Malondialdehyde (MDA); (B) Superoxide dismutase (SOD); (C) Catalase (CAT). Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. #P < 0.05, P < 0.001, P < 0.0001 vs. control; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. OVX.
Figure 6Effects of SWR on serotonin synthesis in RBL-2H3 cells. Cells were treated with control, LP533401, SWR (0.01–100 μg/ml) for 48 h. (A) Cell viability; (B) Serotonin concentration; (C) Relative gene expression of TPH-1 and GAPDH; (D) Protein blot and relative intensity of TPH-1 and β-actin. Results were obtained from three independent experiments and expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 vs. control.
Figure 7An overview of the metabolic pathways related to SWR treatment. The notations are as follows: red arrow ↑ upregulated vs. OVX group; blue arrow ↓ downregulated vs. OVX group. Purple shade, lipid metabolism; green shade, amino acid metabolism; yellow shade, tryptophan metabolism.