| Literature DB >> 30186124 |
Simone Kotulla1, Sigrid Elsenbruch1, Till Roderigo1, Alexandra Brinkhoff2, Alexander Wegner3, Harald Engler1, Manfred Schedlowski1, Sven Benson1.
Abstract
A role of inflammatory processes in the pathophysiology of depression is increasingly recognized. Experimental endotoxemia offers an established model to induce transient systemic inflammation in healthy humans, and has been proposed as an experimental paradigm of depression. Indeed, different symptoms of depression can be observed during experimental endotoxemia, including negative mood or dysthymia as key symptoms of depression. Hopelessness and low self-esteem constitute common cognitive symptoms in depression, but have not been specifically assessed during endotoxemia. Thus, we pooled data from healthy volunteers who received low-dose endotoxin (i.e., 0.4 or 0.8 ng/kg lipopolysaccharide, LPS) or placebo in three randomized, controlled studies to investigate the effects of LPS on cognitive schemata related to depression. Validated questionnaires were used to assess self-esteem, hopelessness and the vulnerability factor intolerance of uncertainty after intravenous injection of LPS or placebo. Plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-6 were repeatedly assessed, along with self-reported mood. Because not all questionnaires were available from primary studies, data were analyzed in two separate data sets: In data set 1, self-esteem and intolerance of uncertainty were assessed in N = 87 healthy volunteers, who randomly received either 0.4 or 0.8 ng/kg LPS or placebo. In data set 2, hopelessness was measured in N = 59 volunteers who randomly received either LPS (0.8 ng/kg) or placebo. In both data sets, LPS-application led to significant increases in TNF-α and IL-6, reflecting systemic inflammation. Positive mood was significantly decreased in response to LPS, in line with inflammation-induced mood impairment. General self-esteem, intolerance of uncertainty and hopelessness did not differ between LPS- and placebo groups, suggesting that these negative cognitive schemata are not responsive to acute LPS-induced systemic inflammation. Interestingly, LPS-treated volunteers reported significantly lower body-related self-esteem, which was associated with increased TNF-α concentration. Thus, certain aspects of self-esteem related to physical attractiveness and sportiness were reduced. It is conceivable that this effect is primarily related to physical sickness symptoms and reduced physical ability during experimental endotoxemia. With respect to cognitive symptoms of depression, it is conceivable that LPS affects cognitive processes, but not negative cognitive schemata, which are rather based on learning and repeated experiences.Entities:
Keywords: TNF-α; cytokines; depression; hopelessness; lipopolysaccharide; mood; self-esteem; systemic inflammation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30186124 PMCID: PMC6113574 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Behav Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5153 Impact factor: 3.558
Sociodemographic and psychological characteristics for data set 1 (upper part) and data set 2 (lower part).
| Data set 1 | Placebo | 0.4 ng/kg LPS | 0.8 ng/kg LPS | Test statistic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | |||
| Age (years) | 26.71 ± 1.33 | 27.24 ± 1.40 | 26.80 ± 1.07 | 0.89 | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.92 ± 0.70 | 23.08 ± 0.72 | 23.52 ± 0.57 | 0.41 | |
| Sex ( | / | / | |||
| BDI score | 3.18 ± 0.87 | 2.93 ± 0.91 | 2.90 ± 0.70 | 0.92 | |
| Age (years) | 26.02 ± 0.96 | 27.12 ± 0.77 | 0.40 | ||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.32 ± 0.38 | 23.67 ± 0.47 | 0.28 | ||
| BDI score | 3.11 ± 0.53 | 2.64 ± 0.62 | 0.56 |
BDI, Beck Depression Inventory. All data are shown as mean ± SEM unless otherwise indicated. m = male, f = female. .
Figure 1Data set 1: plasma concentrations of tumor-necrosis-factor (TNF)-α (A) and Interleukin (IL)-6 (B) leukocyte counts (C) and body temperature (D) were measured before (baseline, BL), and 1, 2, 3 and 6 h after injection of either 0.8 ng/kg body weight lipopolysaccharide (LPS; black dots), 0.4 ng/kg body weight LPS (gray dots), or saline (placebo group; white dots). Mood (E) was assessed with the respective subscale of the German Multi-Dimensional Mood (MDBF) questionnaire at BL, as well as 3 and 6 h after injection. C-reactive protein (CRP) (F) was measured at BL and 24 h post injection. ###p < 0.001, ##p < 0.01, #p < 0.05 0.8 ng/kg LPS group vs. placebo group. ***p < 0.001, 0.4 ng/kg LPS group vs. placebo group. For results of repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), see text.
Figure 2Data set 2: plasma concentrations of TNF-α (A) and IL-6 (B), leukocyte counts (C) and body temperature (D) were measured before (BL), and 1, 2, 3 and 6 h after injection of either 0.8 ng/kg body weight LPS (black dots) or saline (placebo group; white dots). Mood (E) was assessed with the respective subscale of the German Multi-Dimensional Mood (MDBF) questionnaire at BL, as well as 3 and 6 h after injection. CRP (F) was measured at BL and 24 h post injection. ###p < 0.001, ##p < 0.01, 0.8 ng/kg LPS group vs. placebo group. For results of repeated measures ANOVA, see text.
Figure 3General self-esteem (A) and body-related self-esteem (B) were assessed with the validated German Multidimensional Self-Worth Scale (MSWS) questionnaire (see text for details) 3 h after injection of either 0.8 or 0.4 ng/kg body weight LPS, or saline (placebo group). Exploratory correlation analysis within the LPS group (C) indicated a significant association between body-related self-esteem and TNF-α plasma concentration 3 h after injection (r = −0.31, p < 0.05; for details, see text). *p < 0.05, result of Bonferroni-corrected post hoc t-test. For results of ANOVA, see text.
Intolerance of uncertainty (data set 1).
| UI-18 subscales | Placebo | 0.4 ng/kg LPS | 0.8 ng/kg LPS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | |||
| Reduced ability to act | 10.55 ± 0.94 | 11.14 ± 0.99 | 12.00 ± 0.83 | 1.45 | 0.23 |
| Burden | 13.33 ± 1.16 | 13.00 ± 1.22 | 11.55 ± 1.02 | 1.01 | 0.36 |
| Vigilance | 14.38 ± 1.20 | 14.00 ± 1.26 | 13.45 ± 1.06 | 0.22 | 0.79 |
Intolerance of uncertainty was assessed in data set 1 using the validated UI-18 questionnaire (Gerlach et al., .