Literature DB >> 3018557

X-rays mutate human lymphoblast cells at genetic loci that should respond only to point mutagens.

H L Liber, P M Leong, V H Terry, J B Little.   

Abstract

We have demonstrated that X-rays induce mutations at 4 of 5 genetic loci. 2 of these loci, which code for a mRNA synthesis factor (resistance to 5,6-dichlororibofuranosylbenzimidazole) and tubulin (resistance to podophyllotoxin), are "small-marker" loci, in that they theoretically respond only to mutations which eliminate a toxin-binding site while leaving the major function of the protein intact. Thus mutations induced by X-rays in these two loci are most likely due to base-pair substitution-type alterations. X-Rays did not induce mutations in the Na+/K+ ATPase (resistance to ouabain), another small-marker locus. Two other loci, hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (resistance to 6-thioguanine) and thymidine kinase (resistance to trifluorothymidine), are "whole-gene" targets in that they theoretically respond to a wide variety of mutagenic changes. X-Rays induced dose-dependent increases in mutant fraction at both of these loci. Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), an agent thought to produce mutations primarily through a base-pair substitution mechanism, induced mutations at all genetic loci tested. The pattern of mutations at the small-marker loci induced by EMS was different than that induced by X-rays, suggesting that the specificities of the mutagens and/or of the loci are different.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3018557     DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(86)90062-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  6 in total

1.  Search for mutations altering protein charge and/or function in children of atomic bomb survivors: final report.

Authors:  J V Neel; C Satoh; K Goriki; J Asakawa; M Fujita; N Takahashi; T Kageoka; R Hazama
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.

Authors:  Deepa M Sridharan; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Steve R Blattnig; Sylvain V Costes; Paul W Doetsch; William S Dynan; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Yared Kidane; Amy Kronenberg; Mamta D Naidu; Leif E Peterson; Ianik Plante; Artem L Ponomarev; Janapriya Saha; Antoine M Snijders; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Jonathan Tang; Erica Werner; Janice M Pluth
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-21

3.  Base substitutions, frameshifts, and small deletions constitute ionizing radiation-induced point mutations in mammalian cells.

Authors:  A J Grosovsky; J G de Boer; P J de Jong; E A Drobetsky; B W Glickman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Ionizing radiation-induced mutagenesis.

Authors:  L H Breimer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Effect of X-ray irradiation on ancient DNA in sub-fossil bones - Guidelines for safe X-ray imaging.

Authors:  Alexander Immel; Adeline Le Cabec; Marion Bonazzi; Alexander Herbig; Heiko Temming; Verena J Schuenemann; Kirsten I Bos; Frauke Langbein; Katerina Harvati; Anne Bridault; Gilbert Pion; Marie-Anne Julien; Oleksandra Krotova; Nicholas J Conard; Susanne C Münzel; Dorothée G Drucker; Bence Viola; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Paul Tafforeau; Johannes Krause
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Mutation and cancer in relation to the atomic-bomb radiation effects.

Authors:  S Kondo
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1988-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.