| Literature DB >> 30184032 |
Amber Malhotra1, Vishal Agrawal1, Kartik Patel1, Mausam Shah1, Kamal Sharma2, Pranav Sharma1, Sumbul Siddiqui1, Nilesh Oswal2, Himani Pandya3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Ebstein's anomaly remains a relatively ignored disease. Lying in the 'No Man's land' between congenital and valve surgeons, it largely remains inadequately studied. We report our short-term results of treating it as a 'one and a half ventricle heart' and propose that the true tricuspid annulus (TTA) 'Z' score be used as an objective criterion for estimation of 'functional' right ventricle (RV).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30184032 PMCID: PMC6122759 DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0100
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ISSN: 0102-7638
Fig. 1Diagrammatic presentation of repair - after delamination, atrialized RV is plicated in vertical fashion just closer to true tricuspid annulus. The true tricuspid annulus is circumferentially plicated using two 5-0 polypropylene suture to create a neoannulus.
ASD=atrial septal defect
Fig. 2Intraoperative photograph of a completed Ebstein's repair showing neoannulus supported by a 3D ring and competent trileaflet repair.
Preoperative details of the study population.
| Parameters | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Median age (years) | 12 (range 1.5 to 27 years) | |
| Sex (male) | 14 (63.6%) | |
| Symptoms | Cyanosis (n%) | 4 (18.2%) |
| Pedal edema (n%) | 4 (18.2%) | |
| Hepatomegaly (n%) | 4 (18.2%) | |
| Supraventricular tachycardia (n%) | 1 (4.5%) | |
| Associated cardiac defects | Ventricular septal defect (n%) | 4 (18.2%) |
| Atrial septal defect (n%) | 18 (81.8%) | |
| Left superior vena cava (n%) | 1 (4.5%) | |
| Carpentier type | B (n%) | 4 (18.2%) |
| C (n%) | 17 (77.3%) | |
| D (n%) | 1 (4.5%) | |
| NYHA class (mean ± SD) | 2.59±0.7 | |
| Mean true tricuspid annulus (mean ± SD) | 49.86±7.4 (range 36 to 66 mm) | |
| True tricuspid annulus Z score (n%) | +2 to +4 | 13 (59.1%) |
| ≥4 | 9 (40.9%) | |
| Tricuspid regurgitation (n%) | Grade 3 | 10 (45.5%) |
| Grade 4 | 12 (54.5%) | |
NYHA=New York Heart Association
Fig. 3Correlation chart showing a negative correlation between TTA 'Z' score and percentage reduction in right ventricular volume following repair with a correlation coefficient of −0.83 (P value <0.01).
RV=right ventricle; TTA=True tricuspid annulus
Postoperative details of the study population.
| Inotrope duration (days) | 1.34±0.65 | |
| Intensive care unit stay (days) | 3.0±0.95 | |
| Hospital stay (days) | 7.7±1.65 | |
| Complications (n%) | Bleeding | __ |
| Complete heart block | 1 (4.5%) | |
| Facial edema | 1 (4.5%) | |
| Arrhythmias | __ | |
| Follow-up period (months) | 20.54±7.62 | |
Fig. 4Schematic representation of severity of Ebstein's anomaly. As the displacement of septal tricuspid leaflet increases, there is a corresponding increase in true tricuspid annulus dilatation and a decrease in the amount of functional right ventricle. Broken lines indicate true tricuspid annulus. Coloured region indicates the thinned out atrialized right ventricle. Black - normal; green - mild dilatation; blue - moderate dilatation; and red - severe dilatation.
Fig. 5Comparison of pre- and postoperative data (follow-up).
Indication for bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt.
| TTA 'Z' score <2 | TTA 'Z' score 2-4 | TTA 'Z' score >4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carpentier type A/B | No BCPS | ± BCPS | BCPS |
| Carpentier type C/D | No BCPS | BCPS | BCPS |
TTA=true tricuspid annulus; BCPS=bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt
| Abbreviations, acronyms & symbols | |
|---|---|
| ACE | = Angiotensin-converting-enzyme |
| ATL | = Anterior tricuspid leaflet |
| BCPS | = Bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt |
| CPB | = Cardiopulmonary bypass |
| ICU | = Intensive care unit |
| LVEF | = Left ventricular ejection fraction |
| NYHA | = New York Heart Association |
| PTL | = Posterior tricuspid leaflet |
| RAA | = Right atrial appendage |
| RV | = Right ventricle |
| STL | = Septal tricuspid leaflet |
| TAPSE | = Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion |
| TR | = Tricuspid regurgitation |
| TTA | = True tricuspid annulus |
| Authors' roles & responsibilities | |
|---|---|
| AM | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published |
| VA | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published |
| KP | Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved; final approval of the version to be published |
| MS | Design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis; final approval of the version to be published |
| KS | Revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |
| PS | Revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |
| SS | Revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |
| NO | Revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published |
| HP | Analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; final approval of the version to be published |