Literature DB >> 30182489

Predicting venous congestion before DIEP breast reconstruction by identifying atypical venous connections on preoperative CTA imaging.

Christopher R Davis1,2, Lyn Jones3, Rachel L Tillett2, Helen Richards2, Sherif M Wilson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous congestion is the principle cause of flap failure after microsurgical breast reconstruction. We aim to correlate preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings with postoperative venous congestion to predict patients at risk of congestion.
METHODS: All patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) breast reconstruction between August 2009 and August 2013 underwent preoperative CTA and prospectively entered the study. Patients with postoperative venous congestion were matched with a similar cohort of complication-free patients. Preoperative CTAs were randomized and re-interpreted by a radiologist, blinded to the subsequent clinical outcome. Inter-group comparisons were performed.
RESULTS: Two hundred and forty DIEP flaps were performed in 202 patients over the 4-year study. Venous congestion affected 15 flaps (6.3%). Preoperative CTA showed significantly more atypical venous connections between deep and superficial systems in congested flaps compared to controls (66.7% vs. 8%; P < .0001), with a positive predictive value of 83%. Atypical connections were narrow, tortuous, or incomplete. Patients with congestion-free flaps had more normal connections (80% vs. 26.7%; P < .001) and more cranial perforators (P = .02). Similar CTA findings between groups included perforator size and lateral position, superficial inferior epigastric vein size, crossing of midline, and absent connections (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CTA identifies atypical venous connections between deep and superficial systems that increase the risk of postoperative DIEP congestion five-fold. Identifying atypical venous connections maximizes the chances of flap survival and minimizes complications for patients considering DIEP breast reconstruction.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30182489     DOI: 10.1002/micr.30367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of visualized preoperative imaging with a focus on surgical procedures of the breast.

Authors:  Bridget Rodkin; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

Review 2.  How to Design and Harvest a Propeller Flap.

Authors:  Marco Pignatti; Valentina Pinto; Ann-Charlott Docherty Skogh; Federico Armando Giorgini; Riccardo Cipriani; Giorgio De Santis; Geoffrey G Hallock
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  FlapMap Visual Language System for Vascular Imaging Prior to Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer.

Authors:  Taylor J Ibelli; Farah Sayegh; Alexander C Kagen; Peter W Henderson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-06-02

4.  In Vivo Perforasome Perfusion in Hemi-DIEP Flaps Evaluated with Indocyanine-green Fluorescence Angiography and Infrared Thermography.

Authors:  Muiz A Chaudhry; James B Mercer; Louis de Weerd
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-05-21

5.  Interdisciplinary Treatment of Breast Cancer After Mastectomy With Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominal Free Flaps in a University Teaching Hospital-A Standardized and Safe Procedure.

Authors:  Dominik Steiner; Raymund E Horch; Ingo Ludolph; Marweh Schmitz; Justus P Beier; Andreas Arkudas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.