| Literature DB >> 30181690 |
Saeram Lee1,2, Jong Youl Kim1, Eosu Kim2,3, KyoungYul Seo4, Youn Jae Kang1,2, Jae Young Kim1, Chul-Hoon Kim2,5, Ho Taek Song6, Lisa M Saksida7,8,9, Jong Eun Lee1,2.
Abstract
Obesity-related metabolic disorders can affect not only systemic health but also brain function. Recent studies have elucidated that amyloid beta deposition cannot satisfactorily explain the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and that dysregulation of glucose metabolism is a critical factor for the sporadic onset of non-genetic AD. Identifying the pathophysiology of AD due to changes in brain metabolism is crucial; however, it is limited in measuring changes in brain cognitive function due to metabolic changes in animal models. The touchscreen-based automated battery system, which is more accurate and less invasive than conventional behavioral test tools, is used to assess the cognition of mice with dysregulated metabolism. This system was introduced in humans to evaluate cognitive function and was recently back-translated in monkeys and rodents. We used outbred ICR mice fed on high-fat diet (HFD) and performed the paired associates learning (PAL) test to detect their visual memory and new learning ability loss as well as to assess memory impairment. The behavioral performance of the HFD mice was weaker than that of normal mice in the training but was not significantly associated with motivation. In the PAL test, the average number of trials completed and proportion of correct touches was significantly lower in HFD mice than in normal diet-fed mice. Our results reveal that HFD-induced metabolic dysregulation has detrimental effects on operant learning according to the percentage of correct responses in PAL. These findings establish that HFD-induced metabolic stress may have an effect in accelerating AD-like pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Cognitive impairment; High-fat diet; Metabolic disorders; Paired Associates Learning test
Year: 2018 PMID: 30181690 PMCID: PMC6120966 DOI: 10.5607/en.2018.27.4.277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Neurobiol ISSN: 1226-2560 Impact factor: 3.261
Fig. 1Body weight and blood glucose level of ND and HFD mice. (A) Effect of HFD on body weight. Male ICR mice were fed an HFD supplement for 12 weeks. (B) Weekly blood glucose levels of ND and HFD mice measured from 8 to 20 weeks of age. (C) Blood glucose levels during the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT). (D) The area under the curve of the glucose during the IPGTT. (E) Blood glucose levels during the intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPITT). (F) The area under the curve of the glucose during the IPITT (n=18/ND and 17/HFD; *p<0.05, †p<0.005, #p<0.001).
Fig. 2Performance of feeding-controlled ND and HFD mice in the progressive ratio 4 (PR4) schedule. (A) Timeline of the behavioral study. (B) Body weight of ND and HFD mice after the food restriction. (C) The number of sessions that met criteria for the fixed ratio (FR) training. (D) The mean PR4 breakpoint of three consecutive sessions of test (n=13/ND and 16/HFD group; *p<0.05, **<0.005).
Fig. 3Rate of training and response accuracy of ND and HFD mice in Paired-Associates Learning (PAL) schedules. (A) Performance of male ICR mice in PAL training for 60 minutes. (B) Average session length in the last 3 sessions of PAL task (Sessions ended in 60 min). (C) The average number of trials per session conducted in the last three sessions of the PAL task. (D) Accuracy in the last three sessions of the PAL task (n=7/ND and 11/HFD group; *p<0.05).
Fig. 4Synaptic morphology changes and Aβ fibril expression in ND and HFD mice. (A) TEM images of CA1, CA3, and DG in the hippocampus. In the high magnification (High Mag), the red triangles are pointing to the post synaptic density. (B) The numbers of synapse in TEM images. (C) Aβ fibril expression of the hippocampus and cortex in the ND and HFD groups at 12 and 24 weeks. Relative intensities of Aβ fibrils to β-actin in the hippocampus and cortex (n=3/ND group and 3/HFD group; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001).
Fig. 5Visual test of ND and HFD mice. (A) Intraocular pressure of the ND and HFD groups. (B) The corneal and retinal morphology of the ND and HFD groups, and layer distribution of the retina measured on optical coherence tomography. (C) H&E staining of the retina. (D) Electroretinography of the ND and HFD groups showing light sensitivity of the rod cells, cone cells, and connecting ganglion cells of each mouse. (E) The quantification of the light sensitivity of the retina to the A- and B-wave and their response time (n=4/ND group and 4/HFD group).