Peter S Graves1, Stephen R Graves2, Tanvir Minhas2, Rebecca E Lewinson2, Isabelle A Vallerand2, Ryan T Lewinson2. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine (P. Graves), Queensway- Carleton Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (P. Graves, Minhas), University of Ottawa; Medical Scribes of Canada (P. Graves, S. Graves, Minhas, R.E. Lewinson), Ottawa, Ont.; Faculty of Health (R.E. Lewinson), York University, Toronto, Ont.; Cumming School of Medicine (Vallerand, R.T. Lewinson), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. pgraves@mediscribecanada.ca. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine (P. Graves), Queensway- Carleton Hospital; Faculty of Medicine (P. Graves, Minhas), University of Ottawa; Medical Scribes of Canada (P. Graves, S. Graves, Minhas, R.E. Lewinson), Ottawa, Ont.; Faculty of Health (R.E. Lewinson), York University, Toronto, Ont.; Cumming School of Medicine (Vallerand, R.T. Lewinson), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergency department efficiency is a priority across Canada. In the United States, scribes may increase the number of patients seen per hour per physician; however, Canadian data are lacking. We sought to implement scribes in a Canadian emergency department with the hypothesis that scribes would increase the number of patients seen per hour per physician. METHODS: We conducted a 4-month quality improvement pilot study in a community emergency department in Ottawa, Ontario. Data collection began January 2015 after scribe training. Physicians received shifts with and without a scribe for a period of 4 months. Across the study, the mean number of patients seen per hour was determined for each physician during shifts with and without a scribe. We compared mean (± standard deviation [SD]) number of patients seen per hour based on presence or absence of a scribe by 2-tailed paired-samples t test. RESULTS: Eleven scribes participated and ranged in age from 18 to 23 years. Twenty-two full- or part-time emergency physicians were followed. We documented 463 physician-hours without use of a scribe and 693.75 physician-hours with use of a scribe. Across all 22 physicians, 18 (81.8%) saw more patients per hour with use of a scribe. Overall, the number of patients seen per hour per physician was significantly greater (+12.9%) during shifts with a scribe (mean [± SD] 2.81 [± 0.78]) than during shifts without a scribe (mean [± SD] 2.49 [± 0.60]; p = 0.006). INTERPRETATION: In this pilot study, the use of scribes resulted in an increased number of patients seen per hour per physician. Because this was a small study at a single centre, further research on the effects of scribes in Canada is warranted. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: Emergency department efficiency is a priority across Canada. In the United States, scribes may increase the number of patients seen per hour per physician; however, Canadian data are lacking. We sought to implement scribes in a Canadian emergency department with the hypothesis that scribes would increase the number of patients seen per hour per physician. METHODS: We conducted a 4-month quality improvement pilot study in a community emergency department in Ottawa, Ontario. Data collection began January 2015 after scribe training. Physicians received shifts with and without a scribe for a period of 4 months. Across the study, the mean number of patients seen per hour was determined for each physician during shifts with and without a scribe. We compared mean (± standard deviation [SD]) number of patients seen per hour based on presence or absence of a scribe by 2-tailed paired-samples t test. RESULTS: Eleven scribes participated and ranged in age from 18 to 23 years. Twenty-two full- or part-time emergency physicians were followed. We documented 463 physician-hours without use of a scribe and 693.75 physician-hours with use of a scribe. Across all 22 physicians, 18 (81.8%) saw more patients per hour with use of a scribe. Overall, the number of patients seen per hour per physician was significantly greater (+12.9%) during shifts with a scribe (mean [± SD] 2.81 [± 0.78]) than during shifts without a scribe (mean [± SD] 2.49 [± 0.60]; p = 0.006). INTERPRETATION: In this pilot study, the use of scribes resulted in an increased number of patients seen per hour per physician. Because this was a small study at a single centre, further research on the effects of scribes in Canada is warranted. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: Aveh Bastani; Blerina Shaqiri; Kristen Palomba; Dominic Bananno; William Anderson Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Anita D Misra-Hebert; Linda Amah; Andrew Rabovsky; Shannon Morrison; Marven Cantave; Bo Hu; Christine A Sinsky; Michael B Rothberg Journal: J Fam Pract Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 0.493
Authors: Heather A Heaton; Ana Castaneda-Guarderas; Elliott R Trotter; Patricia J Erwin; M Fernanda Bellolio Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Jeremy J Hess; Joshua Wallenstein; Jeremy D Ackerman; Murtaza Akhter; Douglas Ander; Matthew T Keadey; James P Capes Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2015-10-20
Authors: Paul R Shafer; Melissa M Garrido; Elsa Pearson; Sivagaminathan Palani; Alex Woodruff; Amanda M Lyn; Katherine M Williams; Susan R Kirsh; Steven D Pizer Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 2.261