| Literature DB >> 30180818 |
Mostafa Abdelsalam1, Ekramy Elmorsy2, Hassan Abdelwahab3, Osman Algohary3, Mahmoud Naguib3, Ahmed Abd El Wahab3, Ahmed Eldeeb3, Ehab Eltoraby4, Adel Abdelsalam4, Alaa Sabry3, Mohamed El-Metwally4, Mohamed Akl5, Nahla Anber6, Maysaa El Sayed Zaki7, Fahad Almutairi8, Tamer Mansour7,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nephrotoxicity is a major hazard complicating the use of platinum based drugs (PBD), which can hinder using higher doses protocols to maximize the therapeutic gain. Shortage of serum creatinine level as an accurate biomarker for acute kidney injuries (AKI) necessitates searching for novel biomarkers with better sensitivity and specificity in patients on PBD.Entities:
Keywords: Cisplatin; Nephrotoxicity; Oxaplatin; Platinum based drugs; Urinary biomarkers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30180818 PMCID: PMC6123931 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-018-1022-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Hydration protocol used for cases enrolled in the study during platinum based drugs (PBD)
| • Before PBD: | |
| i. 1000 mL Sodium Chloride 0.9% | |
| ii. 500 ml sodium chloride with 20mmolKCL | |
| iii. 500 ml sodium chloride with 10 mmol MgSO4 | |
| • During administration of PBD: PBD is given in 1000 mL Sodium Chloride 0.9% infused over 2 h | |
| • After PBD: 1000 mL Sodium Chloride 0.9% with 20 mmol KCL and 10 mmol MgSO4 IV | |
| • Monitoring during chemotherapy: | |
| i. Monitor urine output at regular intervals throughout chemotherapy | |
| ii. At the end of IV fluids, weigh the patient and review fluid input and output | |
| iii. Re-weigh the patient – if they have gained > 2 kg, they should be prescribed furosemide 20 mg orally and urine output monitored for a further 30 min. | |
| • Pre-discharge: | |
| i. Ensure the patient is able to maintain good oral fluid intake | |
| ii. Patient should be advised to drink a lot of fluids | |
| iii. Advise patient to contact the hospital if unable to drink due to vomiting |
Demographic characters, types of cancers, platinum based chemotherapeutic courses and the basal laboratory data of the studied population
| Parameters | AKI (+) 35 (100%) | AKI (−) 97(100%) | Totals 132 (100%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic data | ||||
| a. Age (Mean ± SD) | 50.57 ± 13.33 | 49.25 ± 13.29 | 0.615 | |
| 1. <30Y | 4 (11.8%) | 7 (7.1%) | 11(8.3%) | |
| 2. 30–50 | 10 (28.6%) | 38 (39.1%) | 0.68 | 48 (36.4%) |
| 3. > 50 | 21 (60.1%) | 52 (53.6%) | 73 (55.3%) | |
| b. Gender | ||||
| 1. Males | 17 (48.6) | 57 (58.8%) | 0.298 | 74 (56%) |
| 2. Females | 18 (51.4) | 40 (41.2%) | 58 (44%) | |
| c. BMI | 23.3 ± 4.1 | 24.3 ± 3.4 | 0.161 | 23.5 ± 4.8 |
| Type of cancer | ||||
| a. Gastrointestinal | 19 (54.3%) | 61 (62.9%) | 80 (60.6%) | |
| b. Respiratory | 6 (17.2) | 21 (21.7%) | 27 (20.5%) | |
| c. Reproductive | 2 (5.7%) | 6 (6.3%) | 0.5 | 8 (6%) |
| d. Neuroendocrine | 2 (5.7%) | 2 (2.1%) | 4 (3%) | |
| e. Osteosarcoma | 2 (5.7%) | 2 (2.1%) | 4 (3%) | |
| f. Others | 4 (11.4%) | 5 (5.25%) | 9 (6.8%) | |
| Received PBD agent: | ||||
| a. Cisplatin (50 mg/m2) | 22 (62.9%) | 49 (50.5%) | 71 (53.8%) | |
| b. Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) | 12 (34.3%) | 41 (42.3%) | 0.45 | 53 (40.2%) |
| c. Carboplatin* | 1 (2.9%) | 4 (4.1%) | 5 (3.8%) | |
| d. Cispaltin (50 mg/m2) + Carboplatin | 0 | 3 (3.1) | 3 (2.3%) | |
| Basal line laboratory data before PBD: | ||||
| a. Ser. Cr. (mg/dl) | 0.73 ± 0.2 | 0.74 ± 0.3 | 0.85 | 0.73 ± 0.4 |
| b. BUN (mmol/L) | 4.5 ± 1.7 | 4.6 ± 1.5 | 0.74 | 4.5 ± 2 |
| c. eGFR (ml/min) | 102 ± 4 | 103 ± 5.2 | 0.3 | 102 ± 5.7 |
| d. Sodium (mmol/L) | 137.3 ± 5.1 | 136.6 ± 4.6 | 0.45 | 136.9 ± 5.8 |
| e. Potassium (mmol/L) | 3.6 ± 0.7 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 0.42 | 3.6 ± 0.9 |
| f. Calcium (mg/dl) | 9.66 ± 1.05 | 9.50 ± 0.50 | 0.412 | 9.5 ± 1.1 |
| KIM-1 | ||||
| (0 day) | 1.04 ± 0.2 (0.84–1.24) | 1.2 ± 0.21 (0.99-1.41) | 0.39 | |
BUN; Blood urea Nitrogen, Estimated glomerular filtration.* Carboplatin dose was calculated by Calvert formula
Inter-assays and inter-assay variability of the studied urinary biomarkers ELISA assays
| Urinary biomarker | Inter-assay variability | Intra-assay variability |
|---|---|---|
| KIM-1 | High (10 ng/ml) = 8.2% | 4.53% |
| Low (0.1 ng/ml) =11.46% | ||
| NGAL | High (1000 ng/ml) =9.1% | 5.45% |
| Low (10 ng/ml) =5.5% | ||
| Cys-C | High (100 ng/ml) = 5.97% | 6.76% |
| Low (10 ng/ml) =7% |
Urinary biomarkers data of the studied population represented as means± standard deviation (lower limit- upper limit)
| Biomarkers (ng/ml) | AKI (+) 35 cases | AKI (−) 97 cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. KIM-1 | |||
| Day 0 | 1.04 ± 0.2 (0.84–1.24) | 1.2 ± 0.21 (0.99–1.41) | 0.39 |
| Day 1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 (1.3–1.7) | 1.3 ± 0.2 (1.1–1.5) | 0.62 |
| Day 2 | 2.1 ± 0.19 (1.91–2.29) | 1.2 ± 0.27 (0.93–1.47) | 0.0092** |
| Day 3 | 2.25 ± 0.18 (2.07–2.43) | 1.4 ± 0.2 (1.2–1.6) | 0.0054** |
| 2. NGAL | |||
| Day 0 | 416 ± 46.7 (369.3–462.7) | 413 ± 49.6 (363.4–462.6) | 0.92 |
| Day 1 | 426.3 ± 52.34 (373.69–478.64) | 419.2 ± 58.4 (360.8–477.6) | 0.92 |
| Day 2 | 573.2 ± 39.24 (533.69–612.44) | 422.8 ± 38.3 (384.5–461.1) | 0.0032** |
| Day 3 | 611.6 ± 46.35 (565.25–657.95) | 420.8 ± 42.3 (478.5–463.1) | 0.0088** |
| 3. Cys-c | |||
| Day 0 | 14.5 ± 1.49 (13.01–15.99) | 12.48 ± 1.42 (11.06–13.9) | 0.22 |
| Day 1 | 15.6 ± 1.7 (13.9–17.3) | 12.9 ± 1.1 (11.8–14) | 0.12 |
| Day 2 | 18.6 ± 1.9 (16.7–20.5) | 13.26 ± 0.68 (12.58–13.94) | 0.013* |
| Day 3 | 22.1 ± 2.28 (19.82–24.38) | 13.44 ± 0.53 (12.9–13.97) | 0.003** |
Day 0 means the day of PBD intake. Day 1, day2 and day3 means one, two and three days after PBD intake
* means p< .05, ** means p< .01
Urinary level of KIM-1, NGAL and Cys-C among the studied population with (AKI+) or without acute Kidney injury (AKI-)
| Biomarkers (ng/ml) | AKI (+) 35 cases | AKI (−) 97 cases | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunnett’s multiple comparisons | Two way ANOVA | Two way ANOVA | ||
| 1. KIM-1 | ||||
| Day 0 versus day 1 | < 0.048* | 0.58 | 0.94 | |
| Day 0 versus day 2 | < 0.0026** | < 0.0002*** | 1 | |
| Day 0 versus day 3 | < 0.0015** | 0.29 | ||
| Day 1 versus day 2 | 0.019* | 0.63 | ||
| Day 2 versus day 3 | 0.37 | 0.36 | ||
| 2. NGAL | ||||
| Day 0 versus day 1 | 0.81 | 0.89 | ||
| Day 0 versus day 2 | 0.011* | 0.0015** | 0.81 | 0.99 |
| Day 0 versus day 3 | 0.006** | 0.86 | ||
| Day 1 versus day 2 | 0.017* | 0.95 | ||
| Day 2 versus day 3 | 0.33 | 0.94 | ||
| 3. Cys-c | ||||
| Day 0 versus day 1 | 0.445 | 0.71 | 0.69 | |
| Day 0 versus day 2 | 0.045* | 0.0045** | 0.45 | |
| Day 0 versus day 3 | 0.007** | 0.35 | ||
| Day 1 versus day 2 | 0.11 | 0.66 | ||
| Day 2 versus day 3 | 0.11 | 0.87 | ||
Day 0 means the day of PBD intake. Day 1, day2 and day3 means one, two and three days after PBD intake. Two way ANOVA p-values were shown for each biomarker. Intergroup differences significance was calculated by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. * means p-vlaue< 0.05, ** means p-value< 0.01, while *** means p-value < 0.001
Percentages of increase in the urinary biomarkers KIM-1, NGAL and Cys-C over the course of the study
| Parameters | KIM-1 | NGAL | Cys-C |
|---|---|---|---|
| M% ± SD | M% ± SD | M% ± SD | |
| Basal levels versus levels 2 days before AKI | 44.23 ± 19.2 | 2.5 ± 3 | 7.31 ± 11.7 |
| Basal levels versus levels 1 days before AKI | 101.9 ± 18.27 | 37.8 ± 2.8 | 27.98 ± 13.1 |
| Basal levels versus levels in the days AKI diagnosis | 116.3 ± 17.31 | 47.02 ± 2.72 | 52.2 ± 15.7 |
Percentage of increase were calculated in each patient with individually. Data is represented as means ±standard deviation of all patients biomarkers increase percentages
Comparison of the levels of the urinary markers in patients with AKI (one before AKI diagnosis) and their corresponding level in patients without AKI
| Biomarkers | AUC (95% Confidence Interval) | Cut-off | Sensitivity% | Specificity% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIM-1 | 0.9983 | < 0.0001 | < 1.685 | 96.23 | 100.0 |
| < 1.730 | 96.23 | 97.44 | |||
| < 1.750 | 98.11 | 97.44 | |||
| NGAL | 1 | < 0.0001 | < 498.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| < 508.2 | 100.0 | 98.11 | |||
| < 511.7 | 100.0 | 96.23 | |||
| Cys-S | 1 | < 0.0001 | < 15.43 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| < 16.65 | 100.0 | 96.30 | |||
| < 16.75 | 100.0 | 94.44 |
Fig. 1Sensitivity and specificity of the different urinary biomarkers in cases of AKI