Literature DB >> 30180734

Starting from scratch: implementing outcome measurement in clinical practice.

Claudia Bausewein1, Eva Schildmann2, Johannes Rosenbruch2, Birgit Haberland2, Susanne Tänzler2, Christina Ramsenthaler2.   

Abstract

Outcome measurement is becoming increasingly important in palliative care both in research as well as clinical care. Regular ongoing assessments in palliative care clinical practice have the potential to enable monitoring of the patient's situation, assess the effectiveness of interventions, assess symptoms accurately and focus on patients' priorities. Implementing routine outcome measurement into clinical practice remains a challenge. Therefore, the aim of this article is to describe the process of implementing routine outcome measurement into daily clinical work in a university palliative care unit. According to the recommendations of Antunes, the following steps were used to implement routine outcome measurement in clinical care in a university palliative care unit. (I) Selection of outcomes of interest by the clinical leads and head of department: most prevalent symptoms; psychological, practical and spiritual concerns, functional status, carer burden; (II) selection of outcome measures: Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), phase of illness, Australian Karnofsky Performance Status; (III) educational component about the measure and how to use results: team meetings and team retreat with introduction of outcome measurement in palliative care, chosen measures and role plays with use of measures; (IV) selection of responsible consultant on the ward as coordinator and facilitator for outcome measurement; (V) who applies the measure and its periodicity. Implementation of outcome measurement in clinical routine is feasible following a structured process. Nevertheless, it is a time consuming and long-lasting process which needs continuous attention. However, the benefits outweigh the burden of implementation and it is a task worthwhile undertaking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome measurement; implementation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30180734     DOI: 10.21037/apm.2018.06.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Palliat Med        ISSN: 2224-5820


  7 in total

1.  Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness.

Authors:  Hannah Seipp; Jörg Haasenritter; Michaela Hach; Dorothée Becker; Dania Schütze; Jennifer Engler; Cornelia Ploeger; Stefan Bösner; Katrin Kuss
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.113

2.  Retrospective qualitative pilot study incorporating patients' personal life aspects on admission to palliative care : What should we know about patients to give them the best possible care?

Authors:  Anna Kitta; Feroniki Adamidis; Matthias Unseld; Herbert H Watzke; Eva Katharina Masel
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Introducing Computed Tomography Simulation-Free and Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes-Monitored Palliative Radiation Therapy into Routine Care: Clinical Outcomes and Implementation Experience.

Authors:  Thilo Schuler; Michael Back; George Hruby; Susan Carroll; Dasantha Jayamanne; Andrew Kneebone; Mark Stevens; Gillian Lamoury; Marita Morgia; Shelley Wong; Kylie Grimberg; Stephanie Roderick; Jeremy Booth; Thomas Eade
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-12-03

4.  The primary care provider's role in providing supportive and palliative care for patients in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  René Krause; Nicola Wearne; Tsepo Motsohi; Bianca Davidson
Journal:  S Afr Fam Pract (2004)       Date:  2020-12-11

5.  Systematic symptom and problem assessment at admission to the palliative care ward - perspectives and prognostic impacts.

Authors:  Anja Coym; Anneke Ullrich; Lisa Kathrin Hackspiel; Mareike Ahrenholz; Carsten Bokemeyer; Karin Oechsle
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Implementing person-centred outcome measures in palliative care: An exploratory qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory to understand processes and context.

Authors:  Andy Bradshaw; Martina Santarelli; Malene Mulderrig; Assem Khamis; Kathryn Sartain; Jason W Boland; Michael I Bennett; Miriam Johnson; Mark Pearson; Fliss E M Murtagh
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 7.  Palliative care needs-assessment and measurement tools used in patients with heart failure: a systematic mixed-studies review with narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Bader Nael Remawi; Amy Gadoud; Iain Malcolm James Murphy; Nancy Preston
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.214

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.