| Literature DB >> 30180524 |
Ho-Jun Kwak1, Lina Kim1, Byung-Ju Ryu1, Yun-Hee Kim1, Seung-Wan Park1, Dong-Gyu Cho1, Cheol-Jae Lee1, Kang-Wook Ha1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of a nasogastric tube (NGT) on swallowing simulated saliva in stroke patients.Entities:
Keywords: Dysphagia; Hyoid bone; Nasogastric tube; Stroke; Ultrasonography
Year: 2018 PMID: 30180524 PMCID: PMC6129699 DOI: 10.5535/arm.2018.42.4.551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Rehabil Med ISSN: 2234-0645
Fig. 1.Longitudinal ultrasonographic images of hyoid–mandible approximation at rest and during the swallowing state. (A, B) Longitudinal approach of ultrasonographic probe, anterior view. (C) Longitudinal approach of ultrasonographic probe, lateral view (dotted arrow, mandible bone; black arrow, hyoid bone).
Fig. 2.Hyoid bone displacement. (A) Distance between the mandible and the hyoid bone at rest, (B) during swallowing. The thickest area of the tongue is shown by white arrow; the dotted arrow shows the shadow behind the mandible; the black arrow shows the shadow behind the hyoid bone.
Fig. 3.The range of the hyoid bone movement depicted by a tracer marker at the ultrasonography video taken using a Kinovea v.0.8.15 software (microanalysis for video) (A). The marked range of motion was then measured in pixel units using imageJ, an image processing and analysis program (B). Illustration of the range-of-motion measurement for a hyoid bone trajectory. (C) The illustration shows a hyoid bone trajectory in blue over a single swallow. The initial resting position of the hyoid is marked with the black circle. The red arrow shows the direction of motion for the trajectory. The range-ofmotion measurement is made by finding the largest displacement between any two points on the hyoid bone trajectory during the swallow shown in red dots.
Demographic characteristics of the subjects
| Group A1 (n=20) | Group A2 (n=20) | Group B (n=25) | Group C (n=25) | p-value | Post-hoc test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 13 (65.0) | 12 (48.0) | 14 (56.0) | 0.521 | ||
| Female | 7 (35.0) | 13 (52.0) | 11 (44.0) | - | ||
| Age (yr) | 65.2±14.86 | 65.28±13.52 | 60.08±13.42 | 0.335 | ||
| Onset of stroke (yr) | 1.90±1.80 | 0.78±0.64 | - | 0.014[ | ||
| Stroke location | ||||||
| Cortical/subcortical level | 17 | 21 | - | 0.9267 | ||
| Brain stem level | 3 | 4 | - | - | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.8±2.91 | 23.05±3.13 | 23.83±3.99 | 0.013[ | A, B ≤ B, C | |
| Height (cm) | 167±13.4 | 163±11.5 | 166±9.5 | |||
| MBI | 13.0±9.11 | 34.96±22.8 | 100.0±0 | <0.0001[ | A<B<C | |
| MMSE | 10.4±5.82 | 19.96±16.1 | 30.0±0 | <0.0001[ | A<B<C | |
| MASA | 112.65±29.72 | 175.8±18.53 | 200±0 | <0.0001[ | A<B<C | |
| PAS | 6.97±1.03 | - | - | - | ||
| Tongue thickness (cm) | 4.2±0.41 | 4.11±0.46 | 4.25±0.56 | 3.99±0.42 | 0.24 | |
| Rest distance (cm) | 3.68±0.38 | 3.77±0.45 | 3.99±0.45 | 4.38±0.39 | <0.0001[ | A1, A2, B<C |
Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation.
BMI, body mass index; MBI, Modified Barthel Index; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MASA, Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability; PAS, Penetration‐Aspiration Scale.
p<0.05,
p<0.001.
Comparison of ultrasonographic findings in groups A1, A2, B, and C
| Group A1 | Group A2 | Group B | Group C | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R–S (cm) | 0.81±0.36 | 1.14±0.36 | 1.2±0.32 | 1.5±0.23 | <0.0001[ | |
| Contrast | B vs. others | 0.001[ | 0.909 | - | 0.007[ | |
| p-value | C vs. others | <0.0001[ | 0.001[ | 0.007[ | - | |
| A1 vs. A2 | - | 0.009[ | - | - | ||
| (R–S)/R | 0.22±0.08 | 0.3±0.08 | 0.3±0.08 | 0.34±0.06 | <0.0001[ | |
| Contrast | B vs. others | 0.002[ | 0.997 | - | 0.211 | |
| p-value | C vs. others | <0.0001[ | 0.176 | 0.211 | - | |
| A1 vs. A2 | - | 0.005[ | - | - | ||
| Area (pixel) | 441.43±198.46 | 553.43±193.59 | 571.59±136.83 | 704.29±96.29 | <0.0001[ | |
| Contrast | B vs. others | 0.035[ | 0.981 | - | 0.019[ | |
| p-value | C vs. others | <0.0001[ | 0.01[ | 0.019 | - | |
| A1 vs. A2 | 0.118 | - | - | |||
| Interval (s) | 1.51±0.37 | 1.35±0.31 | 1.19±0.34 | 1.06±0.26 | <0.0001[ | |
| Contrast | B vs. others | 0.006[ | 0.333 | - | 0.479 | |
| p-value | C vs. others | <0.0001[ | 0.016[ | 0.479 | - | |
| A1 vs. A2 | - | 0.383 | - | - |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
R, resting distance; S, shortest distance; R–S, indicates the value calculated by deducting the short distance between the mandible and hyoid bone from the rest distance (the length of the hyoid bone movement); (R–S)/R, the length of the hyoid bone movement/resting distance; Area, the range of the hyoid bone movement depicted; Interval, time between the initiation of hyoid bone movement and the shortest distance of hyoid-mandible approximation.
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001.
Fig. 4.Comparison of ultrasonographic findings in groups A1, A2, B, and C. R–S indicates the value calculated by deducting the short distance between the mandible and hyoid bone from the rest distance (the length of the hyoid bone movement); Area, the range of the hyoid bone movement depicted; Interval, time interval between the initiation of hyoid bone movement and the shortest distance of hyoid-mandible approximation.