Literature DB >> 30180147

The Role of Mixed Reality Simulation for Surgical Training in Spine: Phase 1 Validation.

Giselle Coelho1, Helton L A Defino.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study shows the first phase of validation of a new model for realistic training on spine surgery, conducted from January 2014 to November 2015.
OBJECTIVE: To propose and validate a new tool for neurosurgical education, associating virtual and realistic simulation (mixed reality), for spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical simulation is a relatively new filed that has a lot to offer to neurosurgical education. Training a new surgeon may take years of hands-on procedures, increasing the risk to patient's safety. The development of surgical simulation platforms is therefore essential to reducing the risk of potentially serious risks and improving outcome.
METHODS: Sixteen experienced spinal surgeons evaluated these simulators and answered the questionnaire regarding the simulation as a beneficial education tool. They evaluated the simulators in regard to dissection by planes, identification of pathology (lumbar canal stenosis), instrumentation and simulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, and the relevant aspects of the computerized tomography (CT) imaging.
RESULTS: The virtual and physical simulators for spine surgery were approved by an expert surgery team, and considered adequate for educational purposes. The proportion of the answers was estimated by the confidence intervals.
CONCLUSION: The surgery team considered that this virtual simulation provides a highly effective training environment, and it significantly enhances teaching of surgical anatomy and operative strategies in the neurosurgical field. A mixture of physical and virtual simulation provided the desired results of enhancing the requisite psychomotor and cognitive skills, previously acquired only during a surgical apprenticeship. The combination of these tools may potentially improve and abbreviate the learning curve for trainees, in a safe environment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30180147     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

Review 1.  Advances in tissue state recognition in spinal surgery: a review.

Authors:  Hao Qu; Yu Zhao
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Neuroanesthesiologists as interoperative neurophysiologists: a collaborative cognitive apprenticeship model of training in a community of clinical practice.

Authors:  Nelson Nicolás Algarra; John J McAuliffe; Christoph N Seubert
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Spine Surgery Supported by Augmented Reality.

Authors:  Barbara Carl; Miriam Bopp; Benjamin Saß; Mirza Pojskic; Benjamin Voellger; Christopher Nimsky
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

Review 4.  Current innovation in virtual and augmented reality in spine surgery.

Authors:  Frank J Yuk; Georgios A Maragkos; Kosuke Sato; Jeremy Steinberger
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

Review 5.  Do Resident Surgical Volumes and Level of Training Correlate with Improved Performance on Psychomotor Skills Tasks: Construct Validity Testing of an ASSH Training Platform (STEP)?

Authors:  Jeffrey J Olson; Bo Zhang; Diana Zhu; Evan T Zheng; George S M Dyer; Tamara D Rozental; Dawn M LaPorte
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-02-19

6.  Development and Validation of a Mixed Reality Configuration of a Simulator for a Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Using the Workspace of a Haptic Device and Simulator Users.

Authors:  Sneha Patel; Sami Alkadri; Mark Driscoll
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.