Literature DB >> 30179780

Preference heterogeneity with respect to whole genome sequencing. A discrete choice experiment among parents of children with rare genetic diseases.

Christine Peyron1, Aurore Pélissier2, Sophie Béjean2.   

Abstract

The information to which whole genome sequencing (WGS) provides access raises questions about its disclosure to patients. The literature focused on the nature of findings, shows patients share the same expectations while evoking possible heterogeneity. Our objective is to test this hypothesis of preference heterogeneity with respect to the disclosure of results from WGS by means of a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Our DCE includes six attributes for studying preferences with respect to (1) variants of unknown significance and (2) secondary findings, and more innovatively with respect to (3) repeat analysis of the tests, (4) the decision-making process, (5) patient support and (6) the cost of testing. The survey was conducted at two genetic centres in France from February to December 2015 and included 528 parents of patients with development disorders with no aetiological diagnosis. By using a latent class model, it was possible to identify two preference profiles with parents opting for either a prospective (75% of sample) or a targeted (25%) diagnostic approach. The former valued the exhaustive and diverse genetic information the test can provide, even when the information is uncertain or not directly related to their child's illness; the latter valued only the least uncertain information relating to their child's illness. Understanding patients' preference patterns can help professionals to better accommodate and support patients and enables policy-makers to measure the diversity of expectations in the face of current developments in genomic medicine.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrete choice experiment; France; Genetic testing; Latent class analysis; Rare diseases; Stated preferences; Whole genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30179780     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suzana Karim; Benjamin M Craig; Caroline Vass; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.558

2.  A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Semra Ozdemir; Jia Jia Lee; Isha Chaudhry; Remee Rose Quintana Ocampo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Valuing genetic and genomic testing in France: current challenges and latest evidence.

Authors:  Catherine Lejeune; Ines F Amado
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-01-16

4.  Assessing women's preferences towards tests that may reveal uncertain results from prenatal genomic testing: Development of attributes for a discrete choice experiment, using a mixed-methods design.

Authors:  Jennifer Hammond; Jasmijn E Klapwijk; Sam Riedijk; Stina Lou; Kelly E Ormond; Ida Vogel; Lisa Hui; Emma-Jane Sziepe; James Buchanan; Charlotta Ingvoldstad-Malmgren; Maria Johansson Soller; Eleanor Harding; Melissa Hill; Celine Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Continuing the sequence? Towards an economic evaluation of whole genome sequencing for the diagnosis of rare diseases in Scotland.

Authors:  Michael Abbott; Lynda McKenzie; Blanca Viridiana Guizar Moran; Sebastian Heidenreich; Rodolfo Hernández; Lynne Hocking-Mennie; Caroline Clark; Joana Gomes; Anne Lampe; David Baty; Ruth McGowan; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Mandy Ryan
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-08-20

6.  Genome-Wide Sequencing for Unexplained Developmental Disabilities or Multiple Congenital Anomalies: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

7.  Toward the diagnosis of rare childhood genetic diseases: what do parents value most?

Authors:  Samantha Pollard; Deirdre Weymann; Jessica Dunne; Fatemeh Mayanloo; John Buckell; James Buchanan; Sarah Wordsworth; Jan M Friedman; Sylvia Stockler-Ipsiroglu; Nick Dragojlovic; Alison M Elliott; Mark Harrison; Larry D Lynd; Dean A Regier
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.246

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.