Literature DB >> 30179500

Error-Controlled Exploration of Chemical Reaction Networks with Gaussian Processes.

Gregor N Simm1, Markus Reiher1.   

Abstract

For a theoretical understanding of the reactivity of complex chemical systems, relative energies of stationary points on potential energy hypersurfaces need to be calculated to high accuracy. Due to the large number of intermediates present in all but the simplest chemical processes, approximate quantum chemical methods are required that allow for fast evaluations of the relative energies but at the expense of accuracy. Despite the plethora of benchmark studies, the accuracy of a quantum chemical method is often difficult to assess. Moreover, a significant improvement of a method's accuracy (e.g., through reparameterization or systematic model extension) is rarely possible. Here, we present a new approach that allows for the systematic, problem-oriented, and rolling improvement of quantum chemical results through the application of Gaussian processes. Due to its Bayesian nature, reliable error estimates are provided for each prediction. A reference method of high accuracy can be employed if the uncertainty associated with a particular calculation is above a given threshold. The new data point is then added to a growing data set in order to continuously improve the model and, as a result, all subsequent predictions. Previous predictions are validated by the updated model to ensure that uncertainties remain within the given confidence bound, which we call backtracking. We demonstrate our approach with the example of a complex chemical reaction network.

Year:  2018        PMID: 30179500     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  8 in total

1.  The transferability limits of static benchmarks.

Authors:  Thomas Weymuth; Markus Reiher
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.945

Review 2.  Ab Initio Machine Learning in Chemical Compound Space.

Authors:  Bing Huang; O Anatole von Lilienfeld
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  A Trajectory-Based Method to Explore Reaction Mechanisms.

Authors:  Saulo A Vázquez; Xose L Otero; Emilio Martinez-Nunez
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Uncertainty quantification in classical molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Shunzhou Wan; Robert C Sinclair; Peter V Coveney
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Autonomous Reaction Network Exploration in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis.

Authors:  Miguel Steiner; Markus Reiher
Journal:  Top Catal       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.910

6.  Diagnostics of Data-Driven Models: Uncertainty Quantification of PM7 Semi-Empirical Quantum Chemical Method.

Authors:  James Oreluk; Zhenyuan Liu; Arun Hegde; Wenyu Li; Andrew Packard; Michael Frenklach; Dmitry Zubarev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A quantitative uncertainty metric controls error in neural network-driven chemical discovery.

Authors:  Jon Paul Janet; Chenru Duan; Tzuhsiung Yang; Aditya Nandy; Heather J Kulik
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 9.825

8.  Current and Future Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Medicinal Chemistry Synthesis.

Authors:  Thomas J Struble; Juan C Alvarez; Scott P Brown; Milan Chytil; Justin Cisar; Renee L DesJarlais; Ola Engkvist; Scott A Frank; Daniel R Greve; Daniel J Griffin; Xinjun Hou; Jeffrey W Johannes; Constantine Kreatsoulas; Brian Lahue; Miriam Mathea; Georg Mogk; Christos A Nicolaou; Andrew D Palmer; Daniel J Price; Richard I Robinson; Sebastian Salentin; Li Xing; Tommi Jaakkola; William H Green; Regina Barzilay; Connor W Coley; Klavs F Jensen
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 7.446

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.