Literature DB >> 30178468

Evaluating (and Improving) the Correspondence Between Deep Neural Networks and Human Representations.

Joshua C Peterson1, Joshua T Abbott1, Thomas L Griffiths1.   

Abstract

Decades of psychological research have been aimed at modeling how people learn features and categories. The empirical validation of these theories is often based on artificial stimuli with simple representations. Recently, deep neural networks have reached or surpassed human accuracy on tasks such as identifying objects in natural images. These networks learn representations of real-world stimuli that can potentially be leveraged to capture psychological representations. We find that state-of-the-art object classification networks provide surprisingly accurate predictions of human similarity judgments for natural images, but they fail to capture some of the structure represented by people. We show that a simple transformation that corrects these discrepancies can be obtained through convex optimization. We use the resulting representations to predict the difficulty of learning novel categories of natural images. Our results extend the scope of psychological experiments and computational modeling by enabling tractable use of large natural stimulus sets.
© 2018 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Categorization; Neural networks; Similarity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30178468     DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  9 in total

1.  Scaling up psychology via Scientific Regret Minimization.

Authors:  Mayank Agrawal; Joshua C Peterson; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Controversial stimuli: Pitting neural networks against each other as models of human cognition.

Authors:  Tal Golan; Prashant C Raju; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A model-based analysis of the impairment of semantic memory.

Authors:  Holly A Westfall; Michael D Lee
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-08

4.  What do adversarial images tell us about human vision?

Authors:  Marin Dujmović; Gaurav Malhotra; Jeffrey S Bowers
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Target templates in low target-distractor discriminability visual search have higher resolution, but the advantage they provide is short-lived.

Authors:  Jonas Sin-Heng Lau; Hal Pashler; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Exploring Hierarchical Auditory Representation via a Neural Encoding Model.

Authors:  Liting Wang; Huan Liu; Xin Zhang; Shijie Zhao; Lei Guo; Junwei Han; Xintao Hu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Context Matters: Recovering Human Semantic Structure from Machine Learning Analysis of Large-Scale Text Corpora.

Authors:  Marius Cătălin Iordan; Tyler Giallanza; Cameron T Ellis; Nicole M Beckage; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-02

8.  General object-based features account for letter perception.

Authors:  Daniel Janini; Chris Hamblin; Arturo Deza; Talia Konkle
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 9.  From convolutional neural networks to models of higher-level cognition (and back again).

Authors:  Ruairidh M Battleday; Joshua C Peterson; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.499

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.