Teresa Chapman1, Adina L Alazraki2, Meryle J Eklund3. 1. Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Mail Stop MA.07.220, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. teresa.chapman@seattlechildrens.org. 2. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences,Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an imaging examination in evolution. Rapid developments over recent decades have led to better image quality, an increased number of examinations and greater impact on patient care. OBJECTIVE: To gather data regarding current practices among established programs in North America and provide information to radiologists interested in implementing or growing a fetal MRI service. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey containing 15 questions relevant to the use of fetal MRI was submitted to pediatric radiologists and neuroradiologists. Items regarded scheduling and reporting logistics, magnet strength, patient positioning and patient preparation. Answers and comments were collected, and descriptive statistics were summarized. RESULTS: One hundred and six survey responses were evaluated. Of the survey responses, 62/106 (58.5%) allow fetal MR scheduling any time during the day and 72/105 (68.6%) exclusively use 1.5-T strength platforms for fetal MRI, while only 7/105 (6.7%) use exclusively 3 T. Patient positioning is variable: supine, 40/106 (37.8%); left lateral decubitus, 22/106 (20.8%), and, patient's choice, 43/106 (40.6%). Of the centers responding, 51/104 (49.0%) require no particular fasting instructions, while 20/104 (19.2%) request the patient avoid caffeine before the scanning. CONCLUSION: Logistical trends in performing fetal MRI may supplement the American College of Radiology's published technical standards and offer guidance to radiologists new to the field.
BACKGROUND: Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an imaging examination in evolution. Rapid developments over recent decades have led to better image quality, an increased number of examinations and greater impact on patient care. OBJECTIVE: To gather data regarding current practices among established programs in North America and provide information to radiologists interested in implementing or growing a fetal MRI service. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey containing 15 questions relevant to the use of fetal MRI was submitted to pediatric radiologists and neuroradiologists. Items regarded scheduling and reporting logistics, magnet strength, patient positioning and patient preparation. Answers and comments were collected, and descriptive statistics were summarized. RESULTS: One hundred and six survey responses were evaluated. Of the survey responses, 62/106 (58.5%) allow fetal MR scheduling any time during the day and 72/105 (68.6%) exclusively use 1.5-T strength platforms for fetal MRI, while only 7/105 (6.7%) use exclusively 3 T. Patient positioning is variable: supine, 40/106 (37.8%); left lateral decubitus, 22/106 (20.8%), and, patient's choice, 43/106 (40.6%). Of the centers responding, 51/104 (49.0%) require no particular fasting instructions, while 20/104 (19.2%) request the patient avoid caffeine before the scanning. CONCLUSION: Logistical trends in performing fetal MRI may supplement the American College of Radiology's published technical standards and offer guidance to radiologists new to the field.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fetus; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prenatal diagnosis; Safety
Authors: D Prayer; G Malinger; P C Brugger; C Cassady; L De Catte; B De Keersmaecker; G L Fernandes; P Glanc; L F Gonçalves; G M Gruber; S Laifer-Narin; W Lee; A-E Millischer; M Molho; J Neelavalli; L Platt; D Pugash; P Ramaekers; L J Salomon; M Sanz; I E Timor-Tritsch; B Tutschek; D Twickler; M Weber; R Ximenes; N Raine-Fenning Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Catherine Limperopoulos; Richard L Robertson; Omar S Khwaja; Caroline D Robson; Judy A Estroff; Carole Barnewolt; Deborah Levine; Donna Morash; Luanne Nemes; Linda Zaccagnini; Adré J du Plessis Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.959