| Literature DB >> 30177915 |
Yu-Ting Wu1,2, Cheng-Yu Yang2, Pei-Wen Chiang2, Ching-Hung Tseng2,3, Hsiu-Hui Chiu2, Isaam Saeed4, Bayanmunkh Baatar2,5,6, Denis Rogozin7,8, Saman Halgamuge4, Andrei Degermendzhi7, Sen-Lin Tang2,5,6.
Abstract
Microorganisms are critical to maintaining stratified biogeochemical characteristics in meromictic lakes; however, their community composition and potential roles in nutrient cycling are not thoroughly described. Both metagenomics and metaviromics were used to determine the composition and capacity of archaea, bacteria, and viruses along the water column in the landlocked meromictic Lake Shunet in Siberia. Deep sequencing of 265 Gb and high-quality assembly revealed a near-complete genome corresponding to Nonlabens sp. sh3vir. in a viral sample and 38 bacterial bins (0.2-5.3 Mb each). The mixolimnion (3.0 m) had the most diverse archaeal, bacterial, and viral communities, followed by the monimolimnion (5.5 m) and chemocline (5.0 m). The bacterial and archaeal communities were dominated by Thiocapsa and Methanococcoides, respectively, whereas the viral community was dominated by Siphoviridae. The archaeal and bacterial assemblages and the associated energy metabolism were significantly related to the various depths, in accordance with the stratification of physicochemical parameters. Reconstructed elemental nutrient cycles of the three layers were interconnected, including co-occurrence of denitrification and nitrogen fixation in each layer and involved unique processes due to specific biogeochemical properties at the respective depths. According to the gene annotation, several pre-dominant yet unknown and uncultured bacteria also play potentially important roles in nutrient cycling. Reciprocal BLAST analysis revealed that the viruses were specific to the host archaea and bacteria in the mixolimnion. This study provides insights into the bacterial, archaeal, and viral assemblages and the corresponding capacity potentials in Lake Shunet, one of the three meromictic lakes in central Asia. Lake Shunet was determined to harbor specific and diverse viral, bacterial, and archaeal communities that intimately interacted, revealing patterns shaped by indigenous physicochemical parameters.Entities:
Keywords: Lake Shunet; archaeal; bacterial and viral assemblages; meromictic lake; metagenomics
Year: 2018 PMID: 30177915 PMCID: PMC6109700 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Physicochemical parameters of three sampling depths in Lake Shunet.
| Salinity (g L−1) | 26 | 40 | 71 |
| pH | 8.1 | 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Temp (°C) | 15.5 | 9.5 | 7.5 |
| O2 (mg l−1) | 10.9 | 0 | 0 |
| Ntot (mg l−1) | 2.9 | 4.6 | 5 |
| Ctot (mg l−1) | 100.7 | 160 | 245 |
| Na+ (g l−1) | 4.8 | 8.3 | 11.2 |
| P (mg l−1) | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.1 |
| H2S (mg l−1) | 0 | 0 | 400 |
| 516.7 | 490 | 410 | |
| 19.2 | 34 | 49 | |
| 63.8 | 24 | 21 | |
| 10.4 | 22 | 38 | |
| Fe (mg l−1) | 2.2 | 4.2 | 8 |
| Totminer (g l−1) | 28.1 | 54 | 80 |
Temp, temperature; N.
Figure 1Community structure of (A) archaea and (B) bacteria based on 16S rRNA amplicons (>1% relative abundance) at the genus level across the three depths of Lake Shunet. Heat map and functional clustering based on relative abundance (>1%) of (C) archaeal and (D) bacterial assemblages (against SILVIA database) of meromictic Shunet, Sakinaw, Ursu, and Fara Fund lakes along the depths at the genus level. sh, Lake Shunet; sak, Sakinaw Lake; ursu, Ursu Lake; farafund, Fara Fund Lake. Bacterial community compositions of the four meromictic lakes respectively cluster while Lake Shunet and Sakinaw Lake harbored common archaeal groups.
Summary of the results of the two-tiered binning approach applied to microbial metagenomes.
| 3.0 m | 3-1 | 5,320,493 | 42.62 | 3,854,311 | 10.7 | 75.9 | ||
| 3-2 | 4,794,946 | 38.62 | 5,655,471 | 15.7 | 96.6 | |||
| 3-3 | 1,367,999 | 40.41 | 626,217 | 1.7 | 16.4 | |||
| 3-4 | 1,817,139 | 49.62 | Unknown bacterium | 1,282,507 | 3.6 | 28.5 | ||
| 3-5 | 320,919 | 48.99 | 94,248 | 0.3 | 12.1 | |||
| 3-6 | 2,895,826 | 57.63 | Unknown bacterium | 3,566,847 | 9.9 | 45.7 | ||
| 3-7 | 616,028 | 57.66 | 1,061,784 | 3.0 | 15.5 | 9.6 | ||
| 3-8 | 3,571,362 | 56.35 | 4,187,146 | 11.7 | 61.2 | |||
| 3-9 | 498,520 | 57.30 | 1,665,901 | 4.6 | 7.1 | |||
| 65.51 | 747,233 | 2.1 | 20.8 | |||||
| 64.10 | 1,326,452 | 3.7 | 29.3 | |||||
| 3-12 | 591,555 | 66.11 | 8,087,523 | 22.5 | 10.3 | |||
| 3-13 | 1,175,729 | 65.17 | 1,584,184 | 4.4 | 35.3 | |||
| 3-14 | 506,831 | 63.41 | 776,219 | 2.2 | 20.0 | |||
| 5.0 m | 5-1 | 1,745,731 | 34.09 | 898,099 | 0.5 | 78.4 | ||
| 5-2 | 207,265 | 33.78 | 41,045 | 0.0 | 12.9 | |||
| 5-3 | 1,149,980 | 44.71 | 1,007,171 | 0.6 | 22.0 | |||
| 5-4 | 1,769,280 | 43.68 | 631,419 | 0.4 | 50.8 | 26.1 | ||
| 5-5 | 4,105,682 | 55.09 | 5,182,125 | 3.0 | 69.0 | |||
| 5-6 | 1,626,616 | 64.30 | 36,708,399 | 21.6 | 26.7 | |||
| 5.5 m | 5.5-1 | 233,710 | 28.74 | Uncultured bacterium (with hits to | 260,650 | 0.1 | 13.9 | |
| 5.5-2 | 1,215,938 | 31.03 | Uncultured bacterium (with hits to | 1,595,420 | 0.6 | 62.4 | ||
| 5.5-3 | 1,005,967 | 35.40 | Uncultured bacterium (with hits to | 990,730 | 0.4 | 52.6 | ||
| 5.5-4 | 451,924 | 35.33 | 344,630 | 0.1 | 21.2 | |||
| 5.5-5 | 435,003 | 36.34 | Uncultured bacterium (with hits to | 235,873 | 0.1 | 48.6 | ||
| 5.5-6 | 1,084,706 | 37.25 | Uncultured bacterium (Candidatus | 4,584,399 | 1.7 | 50.7 | ||
| 5.5-7 | 503,708 | 39.05 | Uncultured | 769,643 | 0.3 | 8.6 | ||
| 5.5-8 | 361,955 | 38.51 | 216,055 | 0.1 | 12.1 | 10.8 | ||
| 5.5-9 | 1,017,801 | 44.56 | 667,527 | 0.3 | 30.1 | |||
| 5.5-10 | 1,029,185 | 47.56 | Uncultured candidate division OP1 bacterium | 4,071,850 | 1.5 | 42.3 | ||
| 5.5-11 | 605,053 | 45.43 | 490,201 | 0.2 | 33.3 | |||
| 5.5-12 | 1,051,753 | 47.58 | 1,227,189 | 0.5 | 33.7 | |||
| 5.5-13 | 1,216,430 | 47.17 | 674,195 | 0.3 | 37.9 | |||
| 5.5-14 | 271,285 | 53.82 | Unknown bacterium | 600,060 | 0.2 | 12.5 | ||
| 5.5-15 | 300,891 | 53.73 | 249,040 | 0.1 | 12.0 | |||
| 5.5-16 | 419,569 | 54.53 | 310,830 | 0.1 | 8.3 | |||
| 5.5-17 | 1,317,006 | 56.70 | 1,909,053 | 0.7 | 20.0 | |||
| 5.5-18 | 1,692,070 | 64.65 | 9,588,717 | 3.6 | 27.6 |
Taxonomic assignments were predicted according to BLASTp results (e-value < 10.
Relative abundance was calculated according to the read counts of the bin divided by the total read counts.
Relative abundance was calculated according to the total read counts of all bins per depth divided by the total read counts.
Figure 2Heat map and functional clustering of predicted ORFs from microbial metagenomic contigs based on KO of energy metabolism at three depths. The heat scale is the relative abundance of ORFs assigned to each individual KO of energy metabolic category. a−cDifferent letters denote a significant difference in the statistical test (P < 0.05).
Figure 3NMDS ordination of three sampling depths based on (A,B) the 50 most abundant KO involved in metabolic pathways, (C) bacterial and (D) archaeal community structures at the genus level (>0.1% relative abundance). In each diagram, archaeal, bacterial groups, and limnological parameters with a significant goodness of fit based on post-hoc correlations (P ≤ 0.05) are represented as vectors. In (B), G1* includes Planctomycetaceae:NA and Marinobacter; G2* includes Spartobacteria:NA, Roseivirga, Loktanella, Rhodobacteraceae:NA, Oceanospirillales:NA, Psychroserpens, Luteolibacter, Burkholderiales:NA, Pseudoalteromonas, Persicivirga, and Alcanivorax and Flavobacteriales:NA; and G3* includes Pantoea, Desulfotignum, Bacillus, and Clostridiales:NA. Cyano: Cyanobacteria, Alcali: Alcaligenaceae, Pseudo: Pseudomonas, Desulfuro: Desulfuromonadaceae, Exiguo: Exiguobacterium, Burkholde: Burkholderiales, Flavo: Flavobacteriales, Saccharo: Saccharospirillum, Rosei: Roseivirga, Luteoli: Luteolibacter, Psychro: Psychroserpens, Rhodo: Rhodospirillaceae, Pseudoalte: Pseudoalteromonas, Hypho: Hyphomonas, Rhodospi: Rhodospirillaceae:NA, Sparto: Spartobacteria, Alcani: Alcanivorax, Persici: Persicivirga, and Oceanospi: Oceanospirillales. The 50 genes are outlined as follows: K01633 dihydroneopterin aldolase, K10211 4,4′-diaponeurosporenoate glycosyltransferase, K03186 3-octaprenyl-4-hydroxybenzoate carboxy-lyase UbiX, K01915 glutamine synthetase, K00948 ribose-phosphate pyrophosphokinase, K02689 photosystem I P700 chlorophyll a apoprotein A1, K00265 glutamate synthase (NADPH/NADH) large chain, K02121 V-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit E, K00548 methyltetrahydrofolate– homocysteine methyltransferase, K01674 carbonic anhydrase, K01955 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase large subunit, K01652 acetolactate synthase I/II/III large subunit, K01624 fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, class II, K02293 15-cis-phytoene desaturase, K02302 uroporphyrin-III C-methyltransferase/precorrin-2 dehydrogenase/sirohydrochlorin ferrochelatase, K04042 bifunctional UDP-N-acetylglucosamine pyrophosphorylase/Glucosamine-1-phosphate N-acetyltransferase, K02299 cytochrome o ubiquinol oxidase subunit III, K00266 glutamate synthase (NADPH/NADH) small chain, K03891 ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase cytochrome b subunit, K15666 fengycin family lipopeptide synthetase C, K03464 muconolactone D-isomerase, K00382 dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase, K00104 glycolate oxidase, K01190 beta-galactosidase, K01649 2-isopropylmalate synthase, K00075 UDP-N-acetylmuramate dehydrogenase. K16794 platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase IB subunit alpha, K01803 triosephosphate isomerase (TIM), K07806 UDP-4-amino-4- deoxy-L-arabinose-oxoglutarate aminotransferase, K01535 H+-transporting ATPase, K01953 asparagine synthase (glutamine-hydrolysing), K00395 adenylylsulfate reductase, subunit B, K01903 succinyl-CoA synthetase beta subunit, K02285 phycocyanin beta chain, K00058 D-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase, K05577 NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase subunit 5, K01710 dTDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase, K00363 nitrite reductase (NAD(P)H) small subunit, K03635 molybdopterin synthase catalytic subunit, K11731 citronellyl-CoA dehydrogenase, K00485 dimethylaniline monooxygenase (N-oxide forming), K10203 elongation of very long chain fatty acids protein 6, K16047 3-hydroxy-9,10-secoandrosta-1,3,5(10)-triene-9,17-dione monooxygenase subunit HsaA, K00163 pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component, K00366 ferredoxin-nitrite reductase, K15234 citryl-CoA lyase, K11311 anthranilate dioxygenase reductase, K01179 endoglucanase, K00368; nitrite reductase (NO-forming), and K15655 surfactin family lipopeptide synthetase B.
Figure 4Reconstruction of C, N, and S cycles in Lake Shunet. The energy flux is presented for each depth based on the KEGG annotation of bins and metagenomes (inlet square at right-bottom corner). Numbers inside the gray circles denote bins. Arrows in bold indicate the presence of the pathways in the corresponding metagenomes, but not in bins. In the C cycle, black arrow: respiration, dark gray arrow: aerobic carbon fixation, and light gray arrow: anaerobic carbon fixation. PAPS: 3′-Phosphoadenylyl sulfate, PAS: Adenylyl sulfate, Corg: Organic matter. Underlined numbers in bold represent unknown bacteria. 3-1: Bacteroidetes, 3-2: Flavobacteria, 3-3: Pseudoalteromonas, 3-4: unknown bacterium, 3-6: unknown bacterium, 3-7: Pseudomonas stutzeri-like bacteria, 3-8: Gammaproteobacteria, 3-9: Halomonas, 3-10: Rhodobacteraceae, 3-11: Hyphomonas neptunium-like bacteria, 3-12: Chroococcales, 3-13: Alcanivorax, 3-14: Verrucomicrobia/Chthoniobacter flavus, 3-Flavo-in-vir: Nonlabens sp. sh3vir., 5-1: Firmicutes/Clostridia, 5-2: Staphylococcus, 5-3: Bacteroidetes, 5-4: Bacteroidetes, 5-5: Enterobacteriaceae, 5-6: Thiocapsa, 5.5-2: Uncultured bacterium, 5.5-3: Uncultured bacterium, 5.5-4: Halanaerobium, 5.5-5: Uncultured bacterium, 5.5-6: Uncultured bacterium, 5.5-9: Deltaproteobacteria, 5.5-10: Uncultured candidate division OP1 bacterium, 5.5-12: Desulfobacteraceae, 5.5-13: Bacteroidetes/Marinilabiaceae, 5.5-15: Desulfobacteraceae, 5.5-16: Clostridiaceae, 5.5-17: Halomonas, 5.5-18: Thiocapsa. Please refer to Table 2 for information regarding each bin.
Figure 5Measurement of the diameter of viral particles. (A) TEM photos of viral samples at each sampling depth (left to right: 3.0, 5.0, and 5.5 m) (B) Boxplot of measured diameters. a−cDiameters without a common superscript differed (P < 0.05).
Figure 6Viral community structures at the family level in Lake Shunet. Virus:NA represents unknown virus.
Diversity and richness estimates from the viral metagenomes were determined using PHAACS.
| Best model | Power | Power | Power |
| Richness | 15,877 | 2,498 | 10,000 |
| Evenness | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
| Most abundant genotype (%) | 0.90 | 5.51 | 3.28 |
| Shannon-Wiener Index ( | 9.15 | 6.70 | 8.06 |
Numbers without a common superscript differed (P < 0.05).
Figure 7Predicted CRISPRs of microbial metagenomes were blasted against viral metagenomes at the corresponding depth. (A) At 3.0 m: 1094 CRISPRs (327 hits matched); (B) at 5.0 m: 1129 CRISPRs (220 hits matched), and (C) at 5.5 m: 2886 CRISPRs (591 hits matched).
Figure 8Draft genome organization of Nonlabens sp. sh3vir. and gene conservation among phylogenetically related flavobacterial reference genomes. The outermost concentric circle represents the assembled genome of Nonlabens sp. sh3vir. The green concentric circle depicts Nonlabens dokdonensis DSW-6, with the red and blue ones denoting the Flavobacteria bacterium BBFL7 and Psychroflexus torquis ATCC 700755, respectively. The completeness of draft genome of Nonlabens sp. sh3vir is about 99.8% and the size is ~ 4.2 Mb, comprising 113 contigs. The 5S and 23S rRNA are located between 2.1 and 2.2 Kb.