| Literature DB >> 30177654 |
Marta Stucchi1, Daria C Boffito2, Eleonora Pargoletti3,4, Giuseppina Cerrato5, Claudia L Bianchi6,7, Giuseppe Cappelletti8,9.
Abstract
TiO₂-based photocatalysis under visible light is an attractive way to abate air pollutants. Moreover, developing photocatalytic materials on a large-scale requires safe and low-cost precursors. Both high-performance TiO₂ nanopowders and visible-light active noble metals do not match these requirements. Here, we report the design of novel Mn-decorated micrometric TiO₂ particles. Pigmentary TiO₂ replaced unsafe nano-TiO₂ and firmly supported MnOx particles. Mn replaced noble metals such as Au or Ag, opening the way for the development of lower cost catalysts. Varying Mn loading or pH during the impregnation affected the final activity, thus giving important information to optimize the synthesis. Photocatalytic activity screening occurred on the gas-phase degradation of ethanol as a reference molecule, both under ultraviolet (UV) (6 h) and Light Emitting Diode (LED) (24 h) irradiation. Mn-doped TiO₂ reached a maximum ethanol degradation of 35% under visible light after 24 h for the sample containing 20% of Mn. Also, we found that an acidic pH increased both ethanol degradation and mineralization to CO₂, while an alkaline pH drastically slowed down the reaction. A strict correlation between photocatalytic results and physico-chemical characterizations of the synthesized powders were drawn.Entities:
Keywords: Mn decoration; impregnation pH; micrometric TiO2; surface hydroxyl groups; visible light photocatalysis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30177654 PMCID: PMC6164255 DOI: 10.3390/nano8090686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Gaseous ethanol photodegradation and mineralization degrees by both pure and Mn-doped 1077 samples, under ultraviolet (UV) (after 6 h) and Light Emitting Diode (LED) (after 24 h) irradiation sources.
| Sample | UV (After 6 h) | LED (After 24 h) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Degradation | % Mineralization | % Degradation | % Mineralization | |
| 1077 | 100 | 100 | <2 | <2 |
| Mn51077_4 | 51 | 14 | 6 | <2 |
| Mn101077_4 | 50 | 13 | 12 | <2 |
| Mn201077_4 | 39 | 8 | 35 | 7 |
| Mn301077_4 | 10 | <2 | 10 | <2 |
Figure 1Ethanol disappearance and acetaldehyde formation in the case of Mn201077_4 under both UV and LED sources.
Figure 2Ethanol degradation percentages after 24 h of Light Emitting Diode(LED) photocatalysis, by different pH Mn-impregnated TiO2 samples. Table in inset: Relative mineralization degrees.
Figure 3Diffuse reflectance spectra of impregnated TiO2 powders with different Mn-dopant concentrations.
Band gap values (by diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS)), specific surface area values (SBET) and manganese-to-titanium (Mn/Ti) atomic ratios (by EDS and XPS) for all the adopted samples.
| Sample | Band Gap (eV) | Mn/Ti | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDX | XPS | |||
| 1077 | 3.28 | 10 | – | – |
| Mn51077_4 | 3.05 | 15 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| Mn101077_4 | 2.96 | 14 | 0.09 | 0.12 |
| Mn201077_4 | 2.91 | 16 | 0.18 | 0.22 |
| Mn301077_4 | 2.83 | 11 | 0.30 | 0.37 |
| Mn201077_3 | 3.19 | 10 | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Mn201077_9 | 3.08 | 9 | 0.06 | 0.29 |
| Mn201077_12 | 2.94 | 7 | 0.05 | 0.50 |
Figure 4X-ray diffraction lines of Mnx1077_4 samples (* = MnO2 pyrolusite polymorph).
Figure 5Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images of (a) Mn101077_4; (b) Mn201077_4; and (c) Mn201077_12.
Figure 6XPS high-resolution spectra of oxygen (O1s) relative to (a) Mn201077_3; (b) Mn201077_4; (c) Mn201077_9; and (d) Mn201077_12. Inset: Atomic ratio between the oxygen of surface OH groups (OOH, pink area), and the sum of the previous one and the oxygen of the chemisorbed water molecules (OW, violet areas).