Literature DB >> 30177290

Risk of Becoming Lost to Follow-up During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Kevin B Ginsburg1, Gregory B Auffenberg2, Ji Qi3, Isaac J Powell1, Susan M Linsell3, James E Montie3, David C Miller3, Michael L Cher4.   

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) has emerged as the preferred management strategy for many men with prostate cancer (PC); however, insufficient longitudinal monitoring may increase the risk of poor outcomes. We sought to determine rates of patients becoming lost to follow-up (LTFU) and associated risk factors in a large AS cohort. The Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) maintains a prospective registry of PC patients from 44 academic and community urology practices. Over a 6-yr period (2011-2017), we identified patients managed with AS. LTFU was defined as any 18-mo period where no pertinent surveillance testing was entered in the registry. With a median surveillance period of 32 mo, the estimated 2-yr LTFU-free probability calculated by Kaplan-Meier method was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]=89-92%). Both African American race (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.77, 95% CI=1.81-4.24) and Charlson comorbidity index ≥1 (HR: 1.55, 95% CI=1.08-2.23) were independently associated with increased risk of LTFU. There was variability in rates of estimated 2-yr LTFU-free survival across MUSIC practices, ranging from 52% (95% CI=21-100%) to 99% (95% CI=97-100%), with a median of 96% (interquartile range: 94-98%), although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.076). These data reveal opportunities for urology practices to identify systems to reduce rates of LTFU and improve the long-term safety of AS. PATIENT
SUMMARY: With a median observation period of 32 mo, an estimated 10% of patients will be lost to follow-up at the 2 yr time point while on AS. African American men and generally unhealthy patients were at increased risk, and there was variability from one urology practice to another. There is ample opportunity to improve the quality of the performance of AS.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Prostate cancer; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30177290     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  8 in total

1.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Associated with Increased Medicare Spending in Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Liam C Macleod; Jonathan G Yabes; Mina M Fam; Jathin Bandari; Michelle Yu; Avinash Maganty; Alessandro Furlan; Christopher P Filson; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2019-04-25

2.  Factors associated with loss to follow-up after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  John M Hoyle; Tanya A Correya; Kelly Kenzik; Liton Francisco; Sharon A Spencer; Christopher D Willey; James A Bonner; James W Snider; Drexell Hunter Boggs; William R Carroll; Smita Bhatia; Andrew M McDonald
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Can the LACE index help identify uninsured patients at risk of loss to follow-up during a pharmacist-led transitions of care program?

Authors:  Chiahung Chou; Cassidi C McDaniel; Shelby M Harris; Tim C Lai; Jeanna Sewell
Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)       Date:  2021-11-03

Review 4.  Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Glenda Kith; Sarah Lisker; Urmimala Sarkar; Jill Barr-Walker; Benjamin N Breyer; Nynikka R Palmer
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-06

5.  Receipt of Guideline-Recommended Surveillance in a Population-Based Cohort of Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Ronald C Chen; Sabrina G Prime; Ramsankar Basak; Dominic Himchan Moon; Claire Liang; Deborah S Usinger; Aaron J Katz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 8.013

6.  Five-year follow-up study of a population-based prospective cohort of men with low-risk prostate cancer: the treatment options in prostate cancer study (TOPCS): study protocol.

Authors:  Jinping Xu; Michael Goodman; James Janisse; Michael L Cher; Cathryn Hufford Bock
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Active Surveillance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Current Data.

Authors:  Leandro Blas; Masaki Shiota; Masatoshi Eto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 6.575

8.  Variation in the Use of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Across US Census Regions.

Authors:  Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Neal Patel; Xiaoyue Ma; Adam Calaway; Lee Ponsky; Jim C Hu; Jonathan E Shoag
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.